Seek Returns

LNG vs. PSX: Cheniere Energy vs. Phillips 66 Stock Comparison

How do Cheniere Energy (LNG) and Phillips 66 (PSX) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Cheniere Energy (LNG) and Phillips 66 (PSX) both belong to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, though LNG is classified under Oil & Gas Storage & Transportation while PSX falls under Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing.

Company profile comparison for Cheniere Energy (LNG) and Phillips 66 (PSX)
Profile ItemLNGPSX
NameCheniere Energy Inc.Phillips 66
Country/RegionUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorEnergyEnergy
GICS Industry GroupEnergyEnergy
GICS IndustryOil, Gas & Consumable FuelsOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
GICS Sub-IndustryOil & Gas Storage & TransportationOil & Gas Refining & Marketing
Market Capitalization56.76 billion USD95.85 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateApril 4, 1994April 12, 2012
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

LNG
PSX
GSPC
Loading price history…
Cheniere Energy (LNG) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for Cheniere Energy (LNG) and Phillips 66 (PSX). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for Cheniere Energy (LNG) and Phillips 66 (PSX). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Cheniere Energy (LNG) and Phillips 66 (PSX)
MetricLNGPSX
Total Return (1Y)36.89%88.91%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)19.36%36.18%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)22.59%30.83%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

LNG
PSX
GSPC
Loading price history…
Cheniere Energy (LNG) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for Cheniere Energy (LNG) and Phillips 66 (PSX). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Cheniere Energy (LNG) and Phillips 66 (PSX)
MetricLNGPSX
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)31.41%33.42%
Beta (5Y)0.060.72
Max Drawdown (5Y)-24.87%-44.37%
Avg. Volume (3M)2.00M2.92M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
LNG and PSX are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Cheniere Energy (LNG) and Phillips 66 (PSX)
MetricLNGPSX
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)1.042.53
Sortino Ratio (1Y)1.543.93

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Both Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 39.68% and Phillips 66 (PSX) at 39.84% sit in the top peer quartile for ROE, suggesting each generates more profit from shareholders’ equity than typical industry peers.

LNG

Energy industry group

39.68%

Max
53.85%
LNG
39.68%
Q3
24.79%
Median
12.85%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%

PSX

Energy industry group

39.84%

Max
53.85%
PSX
39.84%
Q3
24.79%
Median
12.85%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%
Loading chart…
Cheniere Energy (LNG) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their ROE against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Both Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 13.40% and Phillips 66 (PSX) at 7.48% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

LNG

Energy industry group

13.40%

Max
56.92%
Q3
22.92%
LNG
13.40%
Median
10.10%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%

PSX

Energy industry group

7.48%

Max
56.92%
Q3
22.92%
Median
10.10%
PSX
7.48%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%
Loading chart…
Cheniere Energy (LNG) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their net margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 30.82% and Phillips 66 (PSX) at 13.17% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

LNG

Energy industry group

30.82%

Max
71.31%
Q3
33.75%
LNG
30.82%
Median
18.73%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%

PSX

Energy industry group

13.17%

Max
71.31%
Q3
33.75%
Median
18.73%
PSX
13.17%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%
Loading chart…
Cheniere Energy (LNG) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their operating margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Cheniere Energy (LNG) and Phillips 66 (PSX)
MetricLNGPSX
ROE (TTM)39.68%39.84%
ROA (TTM)8.61%10.64%
Net Margin (TTM)13.40%7.48%
Operating Margin (TTM)30.82%13.17%
Gross Margin (TTM)34.89%15.08%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 27.21% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Phillips 66 (PSX) at -7.53% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in revenue momentum.

Loading chart…
Cheniere Energy (LNG) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Both Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 69.93% and Phillips 66 (PSX) at 116.23% sit in the top peer quartile for EPS growth, so each is compounding per-share earnings faster than typical industry peers.

Loading chart…
Cheniere Energy (LNG) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Cheniere Energy (LNG) and Phillips 66 (PSX)
MetricLNGPSX
Revenue Growth (YoY)27.21%-7.53%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)-15.77%-8.00%
EPS Growth (YoY)69.93%116.23%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)62.34%-22.60%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Both Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 0.90 and Phillips 66 (PSX) at 1.34 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.

LNG

Energy industry group

0.90

Max
3.64
Q3
2.21
Median
1.41
LNG
0.90
Q1
0.88
Min
0.24

PSX

Energy industry group

1.34

Max
3.64
Q3
2.21
Median
1.41
PSX
1.34
Q1
0.88
Min
0.24
Loading chart…
Cheniere Energy (LNG) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their current ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Phillips 66 (PSX) at 0.52 is near its industry mid-range for debt-to-equity ratio, while Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 2.31 sits above its benchmark range, pointing to a heavier debt load relative to equity.

LNG

Energy industry group

2.31

LNG
2.31
Max
1.75
Q3
0.93
Median
0.54
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

PSX

Energy industry group

0.52

Max
1.75
Q3
0.93
Median
0.54
PSX
0.52
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Cheniere Energy (LNG) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Cheniere Energy (LNG) and Phillips 66 (PSX)
MetricLNGPSX
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.901.34
Debt / Equity (MRQ)2.310.52
Net Debt / EBITDA3.260.82

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 0.82% and Phillips 66 (PSX) at 2.03% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

LNG

Energy industry group

0.82%

Max
8.57%
Q3
3.58%
Median
1.71%
LNG
0.82%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PSX

Energy industry group

2.03%

Max
8.57%
Q3
3.58%
PSX
2.03%
Median
1.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Cheniere Energy (LNG) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Both Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 15.80% and Phillips 66 (PSX) at 16.07% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

LNG

Energy industry group

15.80%

Max
133.24%
Q3
53.31%
Median
25.24%
LNG
15.80%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PSX

Energy industry group

16.07%

Max
133.24%
Q3
53.31%
Median
25.24%
PSX
16.07%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Cheniere Energy (LNG) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Cheniere Energy (LNG) and Phillips 66 (PSX)
MetricLNGPSX
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.82%2.03%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)15.80%16.07%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Both Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 19.78 and Phillips 66 (PSX) at 7.88 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.

LNG

Energy industry group

19.78

Max
39.54
Q3
21.72
LNG
19.78
Median
12.19
Q1
7.71
Min
2.99

PSX

Energy industry group

7.88

Max
39.54
Q3
21.72
Median
12.19
PSX
7.88
Q1
7.71
Min
2.99
Loading chart…
Cheniere Energy (LNG) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Phillips 66 (PSX) at 0.57 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 2.50 prices around its industry’s middle — PSX costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.

LNG

Energy industry group

2.50

Max
5.40
Q3
2.85
LNG
2.50
Median
1.69
Q1
0.88
Min
0.00

PSX

Energy industry group

0.57

Max
5.40
Q3
2.85
Median
1.69
Q1
0.88
PSX
0.57
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Cheniere Energy (LNG) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Both look rich against book: Phillips 66 (PSX) at 2.79 sits in the upper P/B ratio quartile, and Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 8.70 prices even higher, above its industry range.

LNG

Energy industry group

8.70

LNG
8.70
Max
4.21
Q3
2.38
Median
1.51
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01

PSX

Energy industry group

2.79

Max
4.21
PSX
2.79
Q3
2.38
Median
1.51
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01
Loading chart…
Cheniere Energy (LNG) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Cheniere Energy (LNG) and Phillips 66 (PSX)
MetricLNGPSX
P/E Ratio (TTM)19.787.88
P/S Ratio (TTM)2.500.57
P/B Ratio (MRQ)8.702.79
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)3.17%9.93%