L vs. MRSH: Loews vs. Marsh & McLennan Stock Comparison
How do Loews (L) and Marsh & McLennan (MRSH) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Loews (L) and Marsh & McLennan (MRSH) both belong to the Insurance industry, though L is classified under Property & Casualty Insurance while MRSH falls under Insurance Brokers.
| Profile Item | L | MRSH |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Loews Corp. | Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Financials | Financials |
| GICS Industry Group | Insurance | Insurance |
| GICS Industry | Insurance | Insurance |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Property & Casualty Insurance | Insurance Brokers |
| Market Capitalization | 22.19 billion USD | 97.39 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | March 17, 1980 | February 21, 1973 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | L | MRSH |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 7.24% | 16.87% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 19.27% | 3.11% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 14.13% | 6.23% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | L | MRSH |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 16.13% | 26.15% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.49 | 0.51 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -26.11% | -34.36% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 805.54K | 2.43M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | L | MRSH |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.18 | 0.48 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 0.26 | 0.74 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Marsh & McLennan (MRSH) at 27.24% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Loews (L) at 8.21% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in returns on equity.
L
Insurance industry group
8.21%
- Max
- 41.68%
- Q3
- 22.04%
- Median
- 14.81%
- Q1
- 8.79%
- L
- 8.21%
- Min
- -10.66%
MRSH
Insurance industry group
27.24%
- Max
- 41.68%
- MRSH
- 27.24%
- Q3
- 22.04%
- Median
- 14.81%
- Q1
- 8.79%
- Min
- -10.66%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both Loews (L) at 7.93% and Marsh & McLennan (MRSH) at 14.20% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
L
Insurance industry group
7.93%
- Max
- 29.92%
- Q3
- 17.03%
- Median
- 10.97%
- L
- 7.93%
- Q1
- 6.21%
- Min
- -4.68%
MRSH
Insurance industry group
14.20%
- Max
- 29.92%
- Q3
- 17.03%
- MRSH
- 14.20%
- Median
- 10.97%
- Q1
- 6.21%
- Min
- -4.68%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Neither side reports a meaningful operating margin: for Loews (L) in Insurance and Marsh & McLennan (MRSH) in Insurance, funding costs are part of the core business, so net margin and ROE are the cleaner profitability reads.
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | L | MRSH |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 8.21% | 27.24% |
| ROA (TTM) | 1.71% | 7.35% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 7.93% | 14.20% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | -- | -- |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | -- | -- |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Loews (L) at 5.44% and Marsh & McLennan (MRSH) at 10.32% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Both Loews (L) at 24.34% and Marsh & McLennan (MRSH) at 3.06% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | L | MRSH |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 5.44% | 10.32% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 8.96% | 9.20% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 24.34% | 3.06% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 33.10% | 11.75% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Loews (L) in Insurance and Marsh & McLennan (MRSH) in Insurance both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Loews (L) in Insurance and Marsh & McLennan (MRSH) in Insurance run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | L | MRSH |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | -- | -- |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | -- | -- |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -- | -- |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Loews (L) at 0.23% and Marsh & McLennan (MRSH) at 1.80% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
L
Insurance industry group
0.23%
- Max
- 5.12%
- Q3
- 2.15%
- Median
- 0.98%
- L
- 0.23%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
MRSH
Insurance industry group
1.80%
- Max
- 5.12%
- Q3
- 2.15%
- MRSH
- 1.80%
- Median
- 0.98%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Loews (L) at 3.46% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Marsh & McLennan (MRSH) at 44.14% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
L
Insurance industry group
3.46%
- Max
- 76.67%
- Q3
- 35.18%
- Median
- 14.74%
- L
- 3.46%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
MRSH
Insurance industry group
44.14%
- Max
- 76.67%
- MRSH
- 44.14%
- Q3
- 35.18%
- Median
- 14.74%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | L | MRSH |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.23% | 1.80% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 3.46% | 44.14% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Loews (L) at 15.17 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Marsh & McLennan (MRSH) at 24.50 sits in the richer quartile — MRSH needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.
L
Insurance industry group
15.17
- Max
- 28.37
- Q3
- 18.75
- L
- 15.17
- Median
- 12.23
- Q1
- 9.08
- Min
- 2.32
MRSH
Insurance industry group
24.50
- Max
- 28.37
- MRSH
- 24.50
- Q3
- 18.75
- Median
- 12.23
- Q1
- 9.08
- Min
- 2.32
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Loews (L) at 1.18 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Marsh & McLennan (MRSH) at 3.42 sits in the pricier quartile — MRSH costs more per dollar of sales.
L
Insurance industry group
1.18
- Max
- 4.03
- Q3
- 2.25
- Median
- 1.23
- L
- 1.18
- Q1
- 0.85
- Min
- 0.07
MRSH
Insurance industry group
3.42
- Max
- 4.03
- MRSH
- 3.42
- Q3
- 2.25
- Median
- 1.23
- Q1
- 0.85
- Min
- 0.07
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Loews (L) at 1.22 sits in the lower P/B ratio quartile relative to book while Marsh & McLennan (MRSH) at 6.64 prices above its industry range — a wide valuation gap against assets.
L
Insurance industry group
1.22
- Max
- 5.07
- Q3
- 2.79
- Median
- 1.76
- Q1
- 1.23
- L
- 1.22
- Min
- 0.30
MRSH
Insurance industry group
6.64
- MRSH
- 6.64
- Max
- 5.07
- Q3
- 2.79
- Median
- 1.76
- Q1
- 1.23
- Min
- 0.30
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | L | MRSH |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 15.17 | 24.50 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 1.18 | 3.42 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 1.22 | 6.64 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | -- | -- |