INIO vs. PWR: Innio vs. Quanta Services Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Innio (INIO) and Quanta Services (PWR) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but INIO is classified in Electrical Equipment while PWR is classified in Construction & Engineering.

Quanta Services (PWR) has been public since February 12, 1998, giving it decades of market history across multiple cycles, while Innio (INIO) listed only on June 8, 2026 and lacks comparable through-cycle data.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Innio (INIO) reports a negative beta of -1.88, suggesting inverse market sensitivity over the measurement window. That is uncommon for ordinary equities and can reflect commodity-linked or hedge-like exposure, but it can also come from statistical noise. Quanta Services (PWR) has a non-negative beta of 1.29.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Both INIO and PWR need 1-year volatility and 1-year return to plot risk-return positioning.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Capital efficiency shows on one side only: Quanta Services (PWR) earns 18.02% on shareholders’ equity, ranked against its industry; Innio (INIO) has no ROE this period.

Both Innio (INIO) at 2.71% and Quanta Services (PWR) at 4.51% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

Both Innio (INIO) at 16.58% and Quanta Services (PWR) at 8.63% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Both Innio (INIO) at 22.13% and Quanta Services (PWR) at 20.31% sit in the top peer quartile for revenue growth, so each is growing its top line faster than typical industry peers.

Innio (INIO) at 59.26% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Quanta Services (PWR) at 12.77% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for INIO.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

Both Innio (INIO) at 1.27 and Quanta Services (PWR) at 1.16 run current ratio in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.

Quanta Services (PWR) at 0.71 is near its industry mid-range for debt-to-equity ratio, while Innio (INIO) at 8.53 sits above its benchmark range, pointing to a heavier debt load relative to equity.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Innio (INIO) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Quanta Services (PWR) reports a yield of 0.09%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Innio (INIO) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Quanta Services (PWR) reports a payout of 3.98%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Both look expensive on trailing earnings: Quanta Services (PWR) at 48.95 sits in the richer P/E ratio quartile, and Innio (INIO) at 105.92 is richer still, above its industry range.

On P/S ratio, both Innio (INIO) at 2.94 and Quanta Services (PWR) at 2.19 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.

Both look rich against book: Quanta Services (PWR) at 7.73 sits in the upper P/B ratio quartile, and Innio (INIO) at 30.53 prices even higher, above its industry range.

Valuation Metrics