CAT vs. PWR: Caterpillar vs. Quanta Services Stock Comparison
How do Caterpillar (CAT) and Quanta Services (PWR) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Caterpillar (CAT) and Quanta Services (PWR) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but CAT is classified in Machinery while PWR is classified in Construction & Engineering.
| Profile Item | CAT | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Caterpillar Inc. | Quanta Services, Inc. |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| GICS Industry | Machinery | Construction & Engineering |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Construction Machinery & Heavy Transportation Equipment | Construction & Engineering |
| Market Capitalization | 255.63 billion USD | 81.50 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | January 2, 1962 | February 12, 1998 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | CAT | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 6.75% | 32.97% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 38.34% | 51.81% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 25.28% | 38.19% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | CAT | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 41.33% | 50.22% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.65 | 1.29 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -47.79% | -35.15% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 2.82M | 1.19M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | CAT | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.06 | 0.57 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 0.08 | 0.87 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Caterpillar (CAT) at 56.14% clears its industry range for ROE, a sharper capital-efficiency signal than Quanta Services (PWR) at 18.02%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.
CAT
Capital Goods industry group
56.14%
- CAT
- 56.14%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
PWR
Capital Goods industry group
18.02%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- PWR
- 18.02%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
Net Margin (TTM)
Caterpillar (CAT) at 15.21% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Quanta Services (PWR) at 4.51%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
CAT
Capital Goods industry group
15.21%
- Max
- 27.47%
- CAT
- 15.21%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
PWR
Capital Goods industry group
4.51%
- Max
- 27.47%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- PWR
- 4.51%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Caterpillar (CAT) at 20.19% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Quanta Services (PWR) at 8.63%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
CAT
Capital Goods industry group
20.19%
- Max
- 36.60%
- CAT
- 20.19%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
PWR
Capital Goods industry group
8.63%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- PWR
- 8.63%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | CAT | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 56.14% | 18.02% |
| ROA (TTM) | 9.09% | 5.72% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 15.21% | 4.51% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 20.19% | 8.63% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 29.54% | 15.76% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Quanta Services (PWR) at 20.31% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Caterpillar (CAT) at 4.29% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for PWR.
EPS Growth
Both Caterpillar (CAT) at -14.69% and Quanta Services (PWR) at 12.77% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | CAT | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 4.29% | 20.31% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 4.38% | 18.60% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -14.69% | 12.77% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 14.17% | 27.00% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Caterpillar (CAT) at 1.42 and Quanta Services (PWR) at 1.16 run current ratio in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.
CAT
Capital Goods industry group
1.42
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- CAT
- 1.42
- Min
- 0.36
PWR
Capital Goods industry group
1.16
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- PWR
- 1.16
- Min
- 0.36
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Quanta Services (PWR) at 0.71 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while Caterpillar (CAT) at 2.10 uses more debt funding than most peers.
CAT
Capital Goods industry group
2.10
- Max
- 2.33
- CAT
- 2.10
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
PWR
Capital Goods industry group
0.71
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- PWR
- 0.71
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | CAT | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.42 | 1.16 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 2.10 | 0.71 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.25 | 1.43 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Caterpillar (CAT) at 1.13% and Quanta Services (PWR) at 0.09% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
CAT
Capital Goods industry group
1.13%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- CAT
- 1.13%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
PWR
Capital Goods industry group
0.09%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- PWR
- 0.09%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Caterpillar (CAT) at 24.18% and Quanta Services (PWR) at 3.98% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
CAT
Capital Goods industry group
24.18%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- CAT
- 24.18%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
PWR
Capital Goods industry group
3.98%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- PWR
- 3.98%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | CAT | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.13% | 0.09% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 24.18% | 3.98% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Caterpillar (CAT) at 21.92 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Quanta Services (PWR) at 48.95 sits in the richer quartile — PWR needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.
CAT
Capital Goods industry group
21.92
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- CAT
- 21.92
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
PWR
Capital Goods industry group
48.95
- Max
- 59.38
- PWR
- 48.95
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
P/S Ratio (TTM)
On P/S ratio, both Caterpillar (CAT) at 3.29 and Quanta Services (PWR) at 2.19 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.
CAT
Capital Goods industry group
3.29
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- CAT
- 3.29
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
PWR
Capital Goods industry group
2.19
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- PWR
- 2.19
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Both look rich against book: Quanta Services (PWR) at 7.73 sits in the upper P/B ratio quartile, and Caterpillar (CAT) at 11.90 prices even higher, above its industry range.
CAT
Capital Goods industry group
11.90
- CAT
- 11.90
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
PWR
Capital Goods industry group
7.73
- Max
- 9.66
- PWR
- 7.73
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CAT | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 21.92 | 48.95 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 3.29 | 2.19 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 11.90 | 7.73 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 1.55% | 3.78% |