GEV vs. PWR: GE Vernova vs. Quanta Services Stock Comparison
How do GE Vernova (GEV) and Quanta Services (PWR) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
GE Vernova (GEV) and Quanta Services (PWR) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but GEV is classified in Electrical Equipment while PWR is classified in Construction & Engineering.
Quanta Services (PWR) carries decades of public-market history since February 12, 1998, while GE Vernova (GEV) listed on March 27, 2024 — long-window comparisons have far more historical data on the PWR side.
| Profile Item | GEV | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| Name | GE Vernova Inc. | Quanta Services, Inc. |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| GICS Industry | Electrical Equipment | Construction & Engineering |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Heavy Electrical Equipment | Construction & Engineering |
| Market Capitalization | 204.89 billion USD | 81.50 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | March 27, 2024 | February 12, 1998 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | GEV | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 44.63% | 32.97% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | -- | 51.81% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | -- | 38.19% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | GEV | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 55.54% | 50.22% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.12 | 1.29 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -38.29% | -35.15% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 2.65M | 1.19M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | GEV | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.73 | 0.57 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 1.08 | 0.87 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
GE Vernova (GEV) at 93.04% clears its industry range for ROE, a sharper capital-efficiency signal than Quanta Services (PWR) at 18.02%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.
GEV
Capital Goods industry group
93.04%
- GEV
- 93.04%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
PWR
Capital Goods industry group
18.02%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- PWR
- 18.02%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
Net Margin (TTM)
GE Vernova (GEV) at 23.54% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Quanta Services (PWR) at 4.51%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
GEV
Capital Goods industry group
23.54%
- Max
- 27.47%
- GEV
- 23.54%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
PWR
Capital Goods industry group
4.51%
- Max
- 27.47%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- PWR
- 4.51%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both GE Vernova (GEV) at 12.77% and Quanta Services (PWR) at 8.63% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
GEV
Capital Goods industry group
12.77%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- GEV
- 12.77%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
PWR
Capital Goods industry group
8.63%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- PWR
- 8.63%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | GEV | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 93.04% | 18.02% |
| ROA (TTM) | 3.22% | 5.72% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 23.54% | 4.51% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 12.77% | 8.63% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 21.79% | 15.76% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Quanta Services (PWR) at 20.31% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while GE Vernova (GEV) at 8.97% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for PWR.
EPS Growth
GE Vernova (GEV) at 217.03% clears its industry range for EPS growth, a much stronger earnings trajectory than Quanta Services (PWR) at 12.77%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | GEV | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 8.97% | 20.31% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 8.68% | 18.60% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 217.03% | 12.77% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -- | 27.00% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both GE Vernova (GEV) at 0.83 and Quanta Services (PWR) at 1.16 run current ratio in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.
GEV
Capital Goods industry group
0.83
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- GEV
- 0.83
- Min
- 0.36
PWR
Capital Goods industry group
1.16
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- PWR
- 1.16
- Min
- 0.36
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both GE Vernova (GEV) at 0.30 and Quanta Services (PWR) at 0.71 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
GEV
Capital Goods industry group
0.30
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- GEV
- 0.30
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
PWR
Capital Goods industry group
0.71
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- PWR
- 0.71
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | GEV | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 0.83 | 1.16 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.30 | 0.71 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -2.50 | 1.43 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both GE Vernova (GEV) at 0.26% and Quanta Services (PWR) at 0.09% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
GEV
Capital Goods industry group
0.26%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- GEV
- 0.26%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
PWR
Capital Goods industry group
0.09%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- PWR
- 0.09%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both GE Vernova (GEV) at 4.59% and Quanta Services (PWR) at 3.98% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
GEV
Capital Goods industry group
4.59%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- GEV
- 4.59%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
PWR
Capital Goods industry group
3.98%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- PWR
- 3.98%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | GEV | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.26% | 0.09% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 4.59% | 3.98% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
GE Vernova (GEV) at 20.32 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Quanta Services (PWR) at 48.95 sits in the richer quartile — PWR needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.
GEV
Capital Goods industry group
20.32
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- GEV
- 20.32
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
PWR
Capital Goods industry group
48.95
- Max
- 59.38
- PWR
- 48.95
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Quanta Services (PWR) at 2.19 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while GE Vernova (GEV) at 4.65 sits in the pricier quartile — GEV costs more per dollar of sales.
GEV
Capital Goods industry group
4.65
- Max
- 7.54
- GEV
- 4.65
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
PWR
Capital Goods industry group
2.19
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- PWR
- 2.19
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Both look rich against book: Quanta Services (PWR) at 7.73 sits in the upper P/B ratio quartile, and GE Vernova (GEV) at 18.00 prices even higher, above its industry range.
GEV
Capital Goods industry group
18.00
- GEV
- 18.00
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
PWR
Capital Goods industry group
7.73
- Max
- 9.66
- PWR
- 7.73
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | GEV | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 20.32 | 48.95 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 4.65 | 2.19 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 18.00 | 7.73 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 10.79% | 3.78% |