INIO vs. PH: Innio vs. Parker-Hannifin Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Innio (INIO) and Parker-Hannifin (PH) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but INIO is classified in Electrical Equipment while PH is classified in Machinery.

Parker-Hannifin (PH) has been public since March 17, 1980, giving it decades of market history across multiple cycles, while Innio (INIO) listed only on June 8, 2026 and lacks comparable through-cycle data.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Innio (INIO) reports a negative beta of -1.88, suggesting inverse market sensitivity over the measurement window. That is uncommon for ordinary equities and can reflect commodity-linked or hedge-like exposure, but it can also come from statistical noise. Parker-Hannifin (PH) has a non-negative beta of 1.12.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Both INIO and PH need 1-year volatility and 1-year return to plot risk-return positioning.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Capital efficiency shows on one side only: Parker-Hannifin (PH) earns 24.95% on shareholders’ equity, ranked against its industry; Innio (INIO) has no ROE this period.

Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 16.62% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Innio (INIO) at 2.71%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 21.90% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Innio (INIO) at 16.58%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Innio (INIO) at 22.13% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 8.31% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for INIO.

Innio (INIO) at 59.26% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 5.01% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for INIO.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

Both Innio (INIO) at 1.27 and Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 0.94 run current ratio in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.

Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 1.09 is near its industry mid-range for debt-to-equity ratio, while Innio (INIO) at 8.53 sits above its benchmark range, pointing to a heavier debt load relative to equity.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Innio (INIO) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Parker-Hannifin (PH) reports a yield of 0.85%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Innio (INIO) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Parker-Hannifin (PH) reports a payout of 26.11%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 31.53 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Innio (INIO) at 105.92 sits above its peer range — an unusually expensive price for INIO’s trailing earnings.

Innio (INIO) at 2.94 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 5.16 sits in the pricier quartile — PH costs more per dollar of sales.

Both look rich against book: Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 7.25 sits in the upper P/B ratio quartile, and Innio (INIO) at 30.53 prices even higher, above its industry range.

Valuation Metrics