IMO vs. PSX: Imperial Oil vs. Phillips 66 Stock Comparison

November 11, 2026

How do Imperial Oil (IMO) and Phillips 66 (PSX) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Imperial Oil (IMO) and Phillips 66 (PSX) both belong to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, though IMO is classified under Integrated Oil & Gas while PSX falls under Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing.

Company profile comparison for Imperial Oil (IMO) and Phillips 66 (PSX)
Profile Item	IMO	PSX
Name	Imperial Oil Limited	Phillips 66
Country/Region	Canada	United States
GICS Sector	Energy	Energy
GICS Industry Group	Energy	Energy
GICS Industry	Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels	Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
GICS Sub-Industry	Integrated Oil & Gas	Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing
Market Capitalization	58.92 billion USD	95.85 billion USD
Currency	USD	USD
Exchange	NYSE American	NYSE
Listing Date	March 17, 1980	April 12, 2012
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

IMO

PSX

GSPC

Imperial Oil (IMO) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…

Trailing total returns for Imperial Oil (IMO) and Phillips 66 (PSX). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…

Calendar-year total returns for Imperial Oil (IMO) and Phillips 66 (PSX). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Imperial Oil (IMO) and Phillips 66 (PSX)
Metric	IMO	PSX
Total Return (1Y)	35.68%	88.91%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)	34.62%	36.18%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)	32.18%	30.83%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

IMO

PSX

GSPC

Imperial Oil (IMO) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…

Distribution of monthly total returns for Imperial Oil (IMO) and Phillips 66 (PSX). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Imperial Oil (IMO) and Phillips 66 (PSX)
Metric	IMO	PSX
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)	30.00%	33.42%
Beta (5Y)	0.58	0.72
Max Drawdown (5Y)	-29.72%	-44.37%
Avg. Volume (3M)	573.33K	2.92M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

IMO and PSX are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Imperial Oil (IMO) and Phillips 66 (PSX)
Metric	IMO	PSX
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)	1.05	2.53
Sortino Ratio (1Y)	1.51	3.93

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Both Imperial Oil (IMO) at 25.24% and Phillips 66 (PSX) at 39.84% sit in the top peer quartile for ROE, suggesting each generates more profit from shareholders’ equity than typical industry peers.

IMO

Energy industry group

25.24%

Max: 53.85%
IMO: 25.24%
Q3: 24.79%
Median: 12.85%
Q1: 2.03%
Min: -29.09%

PSX

Energy industry group

39.84%

Max: 53.85%
PSX: 39.84%
Q3: 24.79%
Median: 12.85%
Q1: 2.03%
Min: -29.09%

Imperial Oil (IMO) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their ROE against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Both Imperial Oil (IMO) at 10.88% and Phillips 66 (PSX) at 7.48% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

IMO

Energy industry group

10.88%

Max: 56.92%
Q3: 22.92%
IMO: 10.88%
Median: 10.10%
Q1: 0.07%
Min: -27.38%

PSX

Energy industry group

7.48%

Max: 56.92%
Q3: 22.92%
Median: 10.10%
PSX: 7.48%
Q1: 0.07%
Min: -27.38%

Imperial Oil (IMO) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their net margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both Imperial Oil (IMO) at 21.36% and Phillips 66 (PSX) at 13.17% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

IMO

Energy industry group

21.36%

Max: 71.31%
Q3: 33.75%
IMO: 21.36%
Median: 18.73%
Q1: 6.94%
Min: -24.52%

PSX

Energy industry group

13.17%

Max: 71.31%
Q3: 33.75%
Median: 18.73%
PSX: 13.17%
Q1: 6.94%
Min: -24.52%

Imperial Oil (IMO) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their operating margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Imperial Oil (IMO) and Phillips 66 (PSX)
Metric	IMO	PSX
ROE (TTM)	25.24%	39.84%
ROA (TTM)	10.93%	10.64%
Net Margin (TTM)	10.88%	7.48%
Operating Margin (TTM)	21.36%	13.17%
Gross Margin (TTM)	20.08%	15.08%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Both Imperial Oil (IMO) at -7.42% and Phillips 66 (PSX) at -7.53% post bottom-quartile revenue growth versus peers, pointing to weaker demand or pricing momentum than typical rivals.

Imperial Oil (IMO) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Phillips 66 (PSX) at 116.23% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Imperial Oil (IMO) at -28.24% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for PSX.

Imperial Oil (IMO) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Imperial Oil (IMO) and Phillips 66 (PSX)
Metric	IMO	PSX
Revenue Growth (YoY)	-7.42%	-7.53%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)	-7.56%	-8.00%
EPS Growth (YoY)	-28.24%	116.23%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)	-17.26%	-22.60%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Both Imperial Oil (IMO) at 1.30 and Phillips 66 (PSX) at 1.34 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.

IMO

Energy industry group

1.30

Max: 3.64
Q3: 2.21
Median: 1.41
IMO: 1.30
Q1: 0.88
Min: 0.24

PSX

Energy industry group

1.34

Max: 3.64
Q3: 2.21
Median: 1.41
PSX: 1.34
Q1: 0.88
Min: 0.24

Imperial Oil (IMO) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their current ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Imperial Oil (IMO) at 0.17 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while Phillips 66 (PSX) at 0.52 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.

IMO

Energy industry group

0.17

Max: 1.75
Q3: 0.93
Median: 0.54
Q1: 0.30
IMO: 0.17
Min: 0.00

PSX

Energy industry group

0.52

Max: 1.75
Q3: 0.93
Median: 0.54
PSX: 0.52
Q1: 0.30
Min: 0.00

Imperial Oil (IMO) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Imperial Oil (IMO) and Phillips 66 (PSX)
Metric	IMO	PSX
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.30	1.34
Debt / Equity (MRQ)	0.17	0.52
Net Debt / EBITDA	0.13	0.82

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both Imperial Oil (IMO) at 2.65% and Phillips 66 (PSX) at 2.03% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

IMO

Energy industry group

2.65%

Max: 8.57%
Q3: 3.58%
IMO: 2.65%
Median: 1.71%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

PSX

Energy industry group

2.03%

Max: 8.57%
Q3: 3.58%
PSX: 2.03%
Median: 1.71%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

Imperial Oil (IMO) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Both Imperial Oil (IMO) at 26.49% and Phillips 66 (PSX) at 16.07% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

IMO

Energy industry group

26.49%

Max: 133.24%
Q3: 53.31%
IMO: 26.49%
Median: 25.24%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

PSX

Energy industry group

16.07%

Max: 133.24%
Q3: 53.31%
Median: 25.24%
PSX: 16.07%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

Imperial Oil (IMO) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Imperial Oil (IMO) and Phillips 66 (PSX)
Metric	IMO	PSX
Dividend Yield (TTM)	2.65%	2.03%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	26.49%	16.07%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Both Imperial Oil (IMO) at 13.78 and Phillips 66 (PSX) at 7.88 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.

IMO

Energy industry group

13.78

Max: 39.54
Q3: 21.72
IMO: 13.78
Median: 12.19
Q1: 7.71
Min: 2.99

PSX

Energy industry group

7.88

Max: 39.54
Q3: 21.72
Median: 12.19
PSX: 7.88
Q1: 7.71
Min: 2.99

Imperial Oil (IMO) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Phillips 66 (PSX) at 0.57 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Imperial Oil (IMO) at 1.06 prices around its industry’s middle — PSX costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.

IMO

Energy industry group

1.06

Max: 5.40
Q3: 2.85
Median: 1.69
IMO: 1.06
Q1: 0.88
Min: 0.00

PSX

Energy industry group

0.57

Max: 5.40
Q3: 2.85
Median: 1.69
Q1: 0.88
PSX: 0.57
Min: 0.00

Imperial Oil (IMO) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Both Imperial Oil (IMO) at 3.38 and Phillips 66 (PSX) at 2.79 carry a premium to book value versus peers, sitting in the upper P/B ratio quartile of their industries.

IMO

Energy industry group

3.38

Max: 4.21
IMO: 3.38
Q3: 2.38
Median: 1.51
Q1: 1.08
Min: 0.01

PSX

Energy industry group

2.79

Max: 4.21
PSX: 2.79
Q3: 2.38
Median: 1.51
Q1: 1.08
Min: 0.01

Imperial Oil (IMO) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Imperial Oil (IMO) and Phillips 66 (PSX)
Metric	IMO	PSX
P/E Ratio (TTM)	13.78	7.88
P/S Ratio (TTM)	1.06	0.57
P/B Ratio (MRQ)	3.38	2.79
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)	9.90%	9.93%