ICE vs. UBS: Intercontinental Exchange vs. UBS Stock Comparison
How do Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) and UBS (UBS) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) and UBS (UBS) both belong to the Capital Markets industry, though ICE is classified under Financial Exchanges & Data while UBS falls under Diversified Capital Markets.
| Profile Item | ICE | UBS |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. | UBS Group AG |
| Country/Region | United States | Switzerland |
| GICS Sector | Financials | Financials |
| GICS Industry Group | Financial Services | Financial Services |
| GICS Industry | Capital Markets | Capital Markets |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Financial Exchanges & Data | Diversified Capital Markets |
| Market Capitalization | 96.27 billion USD | 144.79 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | November 16, 2005 | May 16, 2000 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | ICE | UBS |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 18.71% | 30.78% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 18.62% | 29.39% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 6.59% | 25.00% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | ICE | UBS |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 25.87% | 27.78% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.82 | 1.15 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -33.97% | -32.48% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 3.09M | 1.93M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | ICE | UBS |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.56 | 0.95 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 0.80 | 1.44 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Capital efficiency shows on one side only: Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) earns 14.40% on shareholders’ equity, ranked against its industry; UBS (UBS) has no ROE this period.
ICE
Financial Services industry group
14.40%
- Max
- 44.78%
- Q3
- 21.85%
- ICE
- 14.40%
- Median
- 12.91%
- Q1
- 4.48%
- Min
- -18.71%
UBS
Financial Services industry group
--
- Max
- 44.78%
- Q3
- 21.85%
- Median
- 12.91%
- Q1
- 4.48%
- Min
- -18.71%
- UBS
- --
Net Margin (TTM)
Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 38.14% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of UBS (UBS) at 18.18%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
ICE
Financial Services industry group
38.14%
- Max
- 62.84%
- ICE
- 38.14%
- Q3
- 28.05%
- Median
- 15.36%
- Q1
- 4.82%
- Min
- -28.52%
UBS
Financial Services industry group
18.18%
- Max
- 62.84%
- Q3
- 28.05%
- UBS
- 18.18%
- Median
- 15.36%
- Q1
- 4.82%
- Min
- -28.52%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 52.77% and UBS (UBS) at 27.10% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
ICE
Financial Services industry group
52.77%
- Max
- 107.33%
- Q3
- 55.90%
- ICE
- 52.77%
- Median
- 30.09%
- Q1
- 14.60%
- Min
- -44.34%
UBS
Financial Services industry group
27.10%
- Max
- 107.33%
- Q3
- 55.90%
- Median
- 30.09%
- UBS
- 27.10%
- Q1
- 14.60%
- Min
- -44.34%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | ICE | UBS |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 14.40% | -- |
| ROA (TTM) | 2.28% | -- |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 38.14% | 18.18% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 52.77% | 27.10% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | -- | -- |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 7.47% and UBS (UBS) at 4.30% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
UBS (UBS) at 55.26% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 20.71% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for UBS.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | ICE | UBS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 7.47% | 4.30% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 9.47% | 12.44% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 20.71% | 55.26% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 30.77% | 1.60% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) in Financial Services and UBS (UBS) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) in Financial Services and UBS (UBS) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | ICE | UBS |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | -- | -- |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | -- | -- |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -- | -- |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
UBS (UBS) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) reports a yield of 1.17%, ranking against industry peers normally.
ICE
Financial Services industry group
1.17%
- Max
- 9.77%
- Q3
- 3.92%
- ICE
- 1.17%
- Median
- 1.09%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
UBS
Financial Services industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 9.77%
- Q3
- 3.92%
- Median
- 1.09%
- UBS
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 27.79% and UBS (UBS) at 36.30% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
ICE
Financial Services industry group
27.79%
- Max
- 241.07%
- Q3
- 97.36%
- ICE
- 27.79%
- Median
- 25.77%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
UBS
Financial Services industry group
36.30%
- Max
- 241.07%
- Q3
- 97.36%
- UBS
- 36.30%
- Median
- 25.77%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | ICE | UBS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.17% | 0.00% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 27.79% | 36.30% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 23.47 and UBS (UBS) at 15.77 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
ICE
Financial Services industry group
23.47
- Max
- 45.85
- Q3
- 24.64
- ICE
- 23.47
- Median
- 15.37
- Q1
- 9.68
- Min
- 0.16
UBS
Financial Services industry group
15.77
- Max
- 45.85
- Q3
- 24.64
- UBS
- 15.77
- Median
- 15.37
- Q1
- 9.68
- Min
- 0.16
P/S Ratio (TTM)
UBS (UBS) at 2.71 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 8.82 sits in the pricier quartile — ICE costs more per dollar of sales.
ICE
Financial Services industry group
8.82
- Max
- 9.23
- ICE
- 8.82
- Q3
- 4.57
- Median
- 2.72
- Q1
- 1.28
- Min
- -0.55
UBS
Financial Services industry group
2.71
- Max
- 9.23
- Q3
- 4.57
- Median
- 2.72
- UBS
- 2.71
- Q1
- 1.28
- Min
- -0.55
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
On P/B ratio, both Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 3.22 and UBS (UBS) at 1.64 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.
ICE
Financial Services industry group
3.22
- Max
- 7.79
- Q3
- 3.63
- ICE
- 3.22
- Median
- 1.57
- Q1
- 0.81
- Min
- -0.39
UBS
Financial Services industry group
1.64
- Max
- 7.79
- Q3
- 3.63
- UBS
- 1.64
- Median
- 1.57
- Q1
- 0.81
- Min
- -0.39
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ICE | UBS |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 23.47 | 15.77 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 8.82 | 2.71 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 3.22 | 1.64 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | -- | -- |