HWM vs. INIO: Howmet Aerospace vs. Innio Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Howmet Aerospace (HWM) and Innio (INIO) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but HWM is classified in Aerospace & Defense while INIO is classified in Electrical Equipment.

Howmet Aerospace (HWM) has been public since November 1, 2016 with a meaningfully longer listed history, while Innio (INIO) only listed on June 8, 2026 — long-window metrics on the INIO side should be interpreted with caution.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Innio (INIO) reports a negative beta of -1.88, suggesting inverse market sensitivity over the measurement window. That is uncommon for ordinary equities and can reflect commodity-linked or hedge-like exposure, but it can also come from statistical noise. Howmet Aerospace (HWM) has a non-negative beta of 1.27.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Both HWM and INIO need 1-year volatility and 1-year return to plot risk-return positioning.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Capital efficiency shows on one side only: Howmet Aerospace (HWM) earns 37.65% on shareholders’ equity, ranked against its industry; Innio (INIO) has no ROE this period.

Howmet Aerospace (HWM) at 21.10% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Innio (INIO) at 2.71%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

Howmet Aerospace (HWM) at 28.78% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Innio (INIO) at 16.58%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Innio (INIO) at 22.13% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Howmet Aerospace (HWM) at 11.06% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for INIO.

Both Howmet Aerospace (HWM) at 32.03% and Innio (INIO) at 59.26% sit in the top peer quartile for EPS growth, so each is compounding per-share earnings faster than typical industry peers.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

Howmet Aerospace (HWM) at 1.86 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Innio (INIO) at 1.27 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for INIO.

Howmet Aerospace (HWM) at 0.80 is near its industry mid-range for debt-to-equity ratio, while Innio (INIO) at 8.53 sits above its benchmark range, pointing to a heavier debt load relative to equity.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Innio (INIO) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Howmet Aerospace (HWM) reports a yield of 0.25%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Innio (INIO) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Howmet Aerospace (HWM) reports a payout of 9.80%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Both look expensive on trailing earnings: Howmet Aerospace (HWM) at 40.35 sits in the richer P/E ratio quartile, and Innio (INIO) at 105.92 is richer still, above its industry range.

Innio (INIO) at 2.94 prices around its industry’s typical P/S ratio, while Howmet Aerospace (HWM) at 8.41 clears its benchmark range — HWM looks notably rich on sales.

Measured against book value, both Howmet Aerospace (HWM) at 14.20 and Innio (INIO) at 30.53 look expensive — each P/B ratio sits above its industry’s benchmark range.

Valuation Metrics