CAT vs. HWM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 25, 2025

Here’s a clear look at CAT and HWM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	CAT	HWM
Company Name	Caterpillar Inc.	Howmet Aerospace Inc.
Country	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Industrials	Industrials
GICS Industry	Machinery	Aerospace & Defense
Market Capitalization	197.04 billion USD	69.31 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	January 2, 1962	November 1, 2016
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CAT and HWM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CAT vs. HWM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	CAT	HWM
5-Day Price Return	0.74%	-2.30%
13-Week Price Return	19.29%	3.43%
26-Week Price Return	18.91%	34.24%
52-Week Price Return	22.03%	78.42%
Month-to-Date Return	-3.98%	-4.36%
Year-to-Date Return	15.94%	57.21%
10-Day Avg. Volume	3.54M	2.19M
3-Month Avg. Volume	2.76M	3.04M
3-Month Volatility	19.85%	27.87%
Beta	1.46	1.47

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CAT

49.92%

Machinery Industry

Max: 34.68%
Q3: 19.06%
Median: 13.13%
Q1: 8.53%
Min: -4.87%

CAT’s Return on Equity of 49.92% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Machinery industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

HWM

29.58%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 43.89%
Q3: 22.42%
Median: 12.50%
Q1: 5.21%
Min: -6.24%

In the upper quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry, HWM’s Return on Equity of 29.58% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

CAT vs. HWM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CAT

14.95%

Machinery Industry

Max: 19.74%
Q3: 11.24%
Median: 8.13%
Q1: 5.38%
Min: -1.11%

A Net Profit Margin of 14.95% places CAT in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

HWM

18.09%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 14.54%
Q3: 8.08%
Median: 6.17%
Q1: 2.49%
Min: -1.63%

HWM’s Net Profit Margin of 18.09% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

CAT vs. HWM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CAT

18.23%

Machinery Industry

Max: 26.63%
Q3: 16.15%
Median: 11.27%
Q1: 7.72%
Min: -4.91%

An Operating Profit Margin of 18.23% places CAT in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

HWM

24.28%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 16.63%
Q3: 10.38%
Median: 8.29%
Q1: 6.21%
Min: 0.95%

HWM’s Operating Profit Margin of 24.28% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

CAT vs. HWM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	CAT	HWM
Return on Equity (TTM)	49.92%	29.58%
Return on Assets (TTM)	10.81%	13.03%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	14.95%	18.09%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	18.23%	24.28%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	36.53%	32.69%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CAT

1.34

Machinery Industry

Max: 3.83
Q3: 2.32
Median: 1.72
Q1: 1.28
Min: 0.78

CAT’s Current Ratio of 1.34 aligns with the median group of the Machinery industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

HWM

2.31

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 3.09
Q3: 1.98
Median: 1.23
Q1: 1.03
Min: 0.02

HWM’s Current Ratio of 2.31 is in the upper quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

CAT vs. HWM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CAT

2.18

Machinery Industry

Max: 1.49
Q3: 0.75
Median: 0.44
Q1: 0.26
Min: 0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.18, CAT operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Machinery industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

HWM

0.65

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 1.70
Q3: 1.04
Median: 0.68
Q1: 0.41
Min: 0.00

HWM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.65 is typical for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CAT vs. HWM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CAT

12.53

Machinery Industry

Max: 67.55
Q3: 33.79
Median: 13.87
Q1: 7.97
Min: -1.43

CAT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 12.53 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Machinery industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

HWM

7.92

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 36.57
Q3: 19.90
Median: 7.04
Q1: 2.40
Min: -7.63

HWM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.92 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CAT vs. HWM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	CAT	HWM
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.34	2.31
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	0.72	0.91
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	2.18	0.65
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	12.53	7.92

Growth

Revenue Growth

CAT vs. HWM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CAT vs. HWM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CAT

1.37%

Machinery Industry

Max: 5.32%
Q3: 2.84%
Median: 1.87%
Q1: 1.09%
Min: 0.00%

CAT’s Dividend Yield of 1.37% is consistent with its peers in the Machinery industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

HWM

0.22%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 2.03%
Q3: 1.22%
Median: 0.43%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

HWM’s Dividend Yield of 0.22% is consistent with its peers in the Aerospace & Defense industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CAT vs. HWM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CAT

28.60%

Machinery Industry

Max: 202.17%
Q3: 98.65%
Median: 55.54%
Q1: 29.03%
Min: 0.00%

CAT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 28.60% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

HWM

10.74%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 83.87%
Q3: 49.90%
Median: 16.48%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

HWM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 10.74% is within the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CAT vs. HWM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	CAT	HWM
Dividend Yield (TTM)	1.37%	0.22%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	28.60%	10.74%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CAT

20.88

Machinery Industry

Max: 53.66
Q3: 31.29
Median: 22.00
Q1: 16.18
Min: 7.00

CAT’s P/E Ratio of 20.88 is within the middle range for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

HWM

49.65

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 65.97
Q3: 54.11
Median: 34.53
Q1: 23.66
Min: 0.00

HWM’s P/E Ratio of 49.65 is within the middle range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CAT vs. HWM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CAT

3.12

Machinery Industry

Max: 5.04
Q3: 2.72
Median: 1.67
Q1: 1.04
Min: 0.24

CAT’s P/S Ratio of 3.12 is in the upper echelon for the Machinery industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

HWM

8.98

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 8.07
Q3: 4.49
Median: 2.42
Q1: 1.39
Min: 0.00

With a P/S Ratio of 8.98, HWM trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Aerospace & Defense industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

CAT vs. HWM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CAT

9.78

Machinery Industry

Max: 7.23
Q3: 3.90
Median: 2.52
Q1: 1.47
Min: 0.49

At 9.78, CAT’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Machinery industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

HWM

14.90

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 13.67
Q3: 7.92
Median: 4.65
Q1: 2.68
Min: 0.82

At 14.90, HWM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Aerospace & Defense industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CAT vs. HWM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	CAT	HWM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	20.88	49.65
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	3.12	8.98
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	9.78	14.90
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	25.46	68.14