GPN vs. NMR: Global Payments vs. Nomura Stock Comparison
How do Global Payments (GPN) and Nomura (NMR) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Global Payments (GPN) and Nomura (NMR) both fall under the Financial Services industry group, but GPN is classified in Financial Services while NMR is classified in Capital Markets.
Global Payments (GPN) trades as ordinary local shares, while Nomura (NMR) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.
| Profile Item | GPN | NMR |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Global Payments Inc. | Nomura Holdings, Inc. Sponsored ADR |
| Country/Region | United States | Japan |
| GICS Sector | Financials | Financials |
| GICS Industry Group | Financial Services | Financial Services |
| GICS Industry | Financial Services | Capital Markets |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Transaction & Payment Processing Services | Investment Banking & Brokerage |
| Market Capitalization | 25.78 billion USD | 27.53 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | January 16, 2001 | December 17, 2001 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | ADR |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | GPN | NMR |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 31.53% | 35.42% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | -1.66% | 37.86% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | -4.82% | 18.78% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | GPN | NMR |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 42.00% | 29.52% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.80 | 0.79 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -57.06% | -38.40% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 2.69M | 789.26K |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | GPN | NMR |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.65 | 1.06 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 1.10 | 1.55 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Nomura (NMR) at 11.51% is around its peer norm for ROE, while Global Payments (GPN) at 0.84% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker returns on shareholders’ equity.
GPN
Financial Services industry group
0.84%
- Max
- 44.78%
- Q3
- 21.85%
- Median
- 12.91%
- Q1
- 4.48%
- GPN
- 0.84%
- Min
- -18.71%
NMR
Financial Services industry group
11.51%
- Max
- 44.78%
- Q3
- 21.85%
- Median
- 12.91%
- NMR
- 11.51%
- Q1
- 4.48%
- Min
- -18.71%
Net Margin (TTM)
Global Payments (GPN) reports a negative net margin of -11.21%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile Nomura (NMR) reports 17.12%, ranking against industry peers normally.
GPN
Financial Services industry group
-11.21%
- Max
- 62.84%
- Q3
- 28.05%
- Median
- 15.36%
- Q1
- 4.82%
- GPN
- -11.21%
- Min
- -28.52%
NMR
Financial Services industry group
17.12%
- Max
- 62.84%
- Q3
- 28.05%
- NMR
- 17.12%
- Median
- 15.36%
- Q1
- 4.82%
- Min
- -28.52%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Global Payments (GPN) at 15.73% and Nomura (NMR) at 24.36% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
GPN
Financial Services industry group
15.73%
- Max
- 107.33%
- Q3
- 55.90%
- Median
- 30.09%
- GPN
- 15.73%
- Q1
- 14.60%
- Min
- -44.34%
NMR
Financial Services industry group
24.36%
- Max
- 107.33%
- Q3
- 55.90%
- Median
- 30.09%
- NMR
- 24.36%
- Q1
- 14.60%
- Min
- -44.34%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | GPN | NMR |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 0.84% | 11.51% |
| ROA (TTM) | 2.24% | 0.68% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | -11.21% | 17.12% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 15.73% | 24.36% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | -- | -- |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Nomura (NMR) at 10.80% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Global Payments (GPN) at -0.39% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.
EPS Growth
Both Global Payments (GPN) at -6.17% and Nomura (NMR) at 7.17% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | GPN | NMR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -0.39% | 10.80% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -4.96% | 17.17% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -6.17% | 7.17% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 143.57% | 58.75% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Global Payments (GPN) in Financial Services and Nomura (NMR) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Global Payments (GPN) in Financial Services and Nomura (NMR) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | GPN | NMR |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | -- | -- |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | -- | -- |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -- | -- |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Global Payments (GPN) at 1.05% pays an industry-typical yield; Nomura (NMR) at 620.40% is above its entire peer range — the higher number, but one that calls for a look at payout sustainability before treating it as an advantage.
GPN
Financial Services industry group
1.05%
- Max
- 9.77%
- Q3
- 3.92%
- Median
- 1.09%
- GPN
- 1.05%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
NMR
Financial Services industry group
620.40%
- NMR
- 620.40%
- Max
- 9.77%
- Q3
- 3.92%
- Median
- 1.09%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Global Payments (GPN) reports payout ratio above 100% at 178.57%, meaning dividends exceeded current-period earnings and sustainability needs extra context. Meanwhile Nomura (NMR) reports 16.85%, ranking against industry peers normally.
GPN
Financial Services industry group
178.57%
- Max
- 241.07%
- GPN
- 178.57%
- Q3
- 97.36%
- Median
- 25.77%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
NMR
Financial Services industry group
16.85%
- Max
- 241.07%
- Q3
- 97.36%
- Median
- 25.77%
- NMR
- 16.85%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | GPN | NMR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.05% | 620.40% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 178.57% | 16.85% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Nomura (NMR) at 10.83 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Global Payments (GPN) at 173.93 sits above its peer range — an unusually expensive price for GPN’s trailing earnings.
GPN
Financial Services industry group
173.93
- GPN
- 173.93
- Max
- 45.85
- Q3
- 24.64
- Median
- 15.37
- Q1
- 9.68
- Min
- 0.16
NMR
Financial Services industry group
10.83
- Max
- 45.85
- Q3
- 24.64
- Median
- 15.37
- NMR
- 10.83
- Q1
- 9.68
- Min
- 0.16
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Nomura (NMR) at 0.01 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Global Payments (GPN) at 2.24 prices around its industry’s middle — NMR costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.
GPN
Financial Services industry group
2.24
- Max
- 9.23
- Q3
- 4.57
- Median
- 2.72
- GPN
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.28
- Min
- -0.55
NMR
Financial Services industry group
0.01
- Max
- 9.23
- Q3
- 4.57
- Median
- 2.72
- Q1
- 1.28
- NMR
- 0.01
- Min
- -0.55
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
On P/B ratio, both Global Payments (GPN) at 1.11 and Nomura (NMR) at 1.15 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.
GPN
Financial Services industry group
1.11
- Max
- 7.79
- Q3
- 3.63
- Median
- 1.57
- GPN
- 1.11
- Q1
- 0.81
- Min
- -0.39
NMR
Financial Services industry group
1.15
- Max
- 7.79
- Q3
- 3.63
- Median
- 1.57
- NMR
- 1.15
- Q1
- 0.81
- Min
- -0.39
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | GPN | NMR |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 173.93 | 10.83 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 2.24 | 0.01 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 1.11 | 1.15 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | -- | -- |