Seek Returns

GPN vs. MS: Global Payments vs. Morgan Stanley Stock Comparison

How do Global Payments (GPN) and Morgan Stanley (MS) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Global Payments (GPN) and Morgan Stanley (MS) both fall under the Financial Services industry group, but GPN is classified in Financial Services while MS is classified in Capital Markets.

Company profile comparison for Global Payments (GPN) and Morgan Stanley (MS)
Profile ItemGPNMS
NameGlobal Payments Inc.Morgan Stanley Common Stock
Country/RegionUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorFinancialsFinancials
GICS Industry GroupFinancial ServicesFinancial Services
GICS IndustryFinancial ServicesCapital Markets
GICS Sub-IndustryTransaction & Payment Processing ServicesInvestment Banking & Brokerage
Market Capitalization25.78 billion USD283.60 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJanuary 16, 2001February 23, 1993
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

GPN
MS
GSPC
Loading price history…
Global Payments (GPN) vs. Morgan Stanley (MS), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for Global Payments (GPN) and Morgan Stanley (MS). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for Global Payments (GPN) and Morgan Stanley (MS). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Global Payments (GPN) and Morgan Stanley (MS)
MetricGPNMS
Total Return (1Y)31.53%19.44%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)-1.66%40.69%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)-4.82%17.38%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

GPN
MS
GSPC
Loading price history…
Global Payments (GPN) vs. Morgan Stanley (MS), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for Global Payments (GPN) and Morgan Stanley (MS). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Global Payments (GPN) and Morgan Stanley (MS)
MetricGPNMS
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)42.00%29.73%
Beta (5Y)0.801.21
Max Drawdown (5Y)-57.06%-32.38%
Avg. Volume (3M)2.69M5.37M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
GPN and MS are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Global Payments (GPN) and Morgan Stanley (MS)
MetricGPNMS
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)0.650.51
Sortino Ratio (1Y)1.100.73

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Morgan Stanley (MS) at 18.04% is around its peer norm for ROE, while Global Payments (GPN) at 0.84% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker returns on shareholders’ equity.

GPN

Financial Services industry group

0.84%

Max
44.78%
Q3
21.85%
Median
12.91%
Q1
4.48%
GPN
0.84%
Min
-18.71%

MS

Financial Services industry group

18.04%

Max
44.78%
Q3
21.85%
MS
18.04%
Median
12.91%
Q1
4.48%
Min
-18.71%
Loading chart…
Global Payments (GPN) vs. Morgan Stanley (MS): A comparison of their ROE against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Global Payments (GPN) reports a negative net margin of -11.21%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile Morgan Stanley (MS) reports 25.63%, ranking against industry peers normally.

GPN

Financial Services industry group

-11.21%

Max
62.84%
Q3
28.05%
Median
15.36%
Q1
4.82%
GPN
-11.21%
Min
-28.52%

MS

Financial Services industry group

25.63%

Max
62.84%
Q3
28.05%
MS
25.63%
Median
15.36%
Q1
4.82%
Min
-28.52%
Loading chart…
Global Payments (GPN) vs. Morgan Stanley (MS): A comparison of their net margin against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both Global Payments (GPN) at 15.73% and Morgan Stanley (MS) at 39.00% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

GPN

Financial Services industry group

15.73%

Max
107.33%
Q3
55.90%
Median
30.09%
GPN
15.73%
Q1
14.60%
Min
-44.34%

MS

Financial Services industry group

39.00%

Max
107.33%
Q3
55.90%
MS
39.00%
Median
30.09%
Q1
14.60%
Min
-44.34%
Loading chart…
Global Payments (GPN) vs. Morgan Stanley (MS): A comparison of their operating margin against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Global Payments (GPN) and Morgan Stanley (MS)
MetricGPNMS
ROE (TTM)0.84%18.04%
ROA (TTM)2.24%1.35%
Net Margin (TTM)-11.21%25.63%
Operating Margin (TTM)15.73%39.00%
Gross Margin (TTM)----

Growth

Revenue Growth

Morgan Stanley (MS) at 14.48% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Global Payments (GPN) at -0.39% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Loading chart…
Global Payments (GPN) vs. Morgan Stanley (MS): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Both Global Payments (GPN) at -6.17% and Morgan Stanley (MS) at 28.43% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Loading chart…
Global Payments (GPN) vs. Morgan Stanley (MS): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Global Payments (GPN) and Morgan Stanley (MS)
MetricGPNMS
Revenue Growth (YoY)-0.39%14.48%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)-4.96%9.52%
EPS Growth (YoY)-6.17%28.43%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)143.57%18.41%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Global Payments (GPN) in Financial Services and Morgan Stanley (MS) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Global Payments (GPN) in Financial Services and Morgan Stanley (MS) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Global Payments (GPN) and Morgan Stanley (MS)
MetricGPNMS
Current Ratio (MRQ)----
Debt / Equity (MRQ)----
Net Debt / EBITDA----

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both Global Payments (GPN) at 1.05% and Morgan Stanley (MS) at 2.40% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

GPN

Financial Services industry group

1.05%

Max
9.77%
Q3
3.92%
Median
1.09%
GPN
1.05%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MS

Financial Services industry group

2.40%

Max
9.77%
Q3
3.92%
MS
2.40%
Median
1.09%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Global Payments (GPN) vs. Morgan Stanley (MS): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Global Payments (GPN) reports payout ratio above 100% at 178.57%, meaning dividends exceeded current-period earnings and sustainability needs extra context. Meanwhile Morgan Stanley (MS) reports 32.91%, ranking against industry peers normally.

GPN

Financial Services industry group

178.57%

Max
241.07%
GPN
178.57%
Q3
97.36%
Median
25.77%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MS

Financial Services industry group

32.91%

Max
241.07%
Q3
97.36%
MS
32.91%
Median
25.77%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Global Payments (GPN) vs. Morgan Stanley (MS): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Global Payments (GPN) and Morgan Stanley (MS)
MetricGPNMS
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.05%2.40%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)178.57%32.91%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Morgan Stanley (MS) at 14.39 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Global Payments (GPN) at 173.93 sits above its peer range — an unusually expensive price for GPN’s trailing earnings.

GPN

Financial Services industry group

173.93

GPN
173.93
Max
45.85
Q3
24.64
Median
15.37
Q1
9.68
Min
0.16

MS

Financial Services industry group

14.39

Max
45.85
Q3
24.64
Median
15.37
MS
14.39
Q1
9.68
Min
0.16
Loading chart…
Global Payments (GPN) vs. Morgan Stanley (MS): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

On P/S ratio, both Global Payments (GPN) at 2.24 and Morgan Stanley (MS) at 3.55 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.

GPN

Financial Services industry group

2.24

Max
9.23
Q3
4.57
Median
2.72
GPN
2.24
Q1
1.28
Min
-0.55

MS

Financial Services industry group

3.55

Max
9.23
Q3
4.57
MS
3.55
Median
2.72
Q1
1.28
Min
-0.55
Loading chart…
Global Payments (GPN) vs. Morgan Stanley (MS): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

On P/B ratio, both Global Payments (GPN) at 1.11 and Morgan Stanley (MS) at 2.65 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.

GPN

Financial Services industry group

1.11

Max
7.79
Q3
3.63
Median
1.57
GPN
1.11
Q1
0.81
Min
-0.39

MS

Financial Services industry group

2.65

Max
7.79
Q3
3.63
MS
2.65
Median
1.57
Q1
0.81
Min
-0.39
Loading chart…
Global Payments (GPN) vs. Morgan Stanley (MS): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Global Payments (GPN) and Morgan Stanley (MS)
MetricGPNMS
P/E Ratio (TTM)173.9314.39
P/S Ratio (TTM)2.243.55
P/B Ratio (MRQ)1.112.65
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)----