Seek Returns logo

GLPI vs. KIM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GLPI and KIM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Both GLPI and KIM are Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs). These entities are required to distribute the majority of their taxable income to shareholders, often resulting in higher dividend yields.

SymbolGLPIKIM
Company NameGaming and Leisure Properties, Inc.Kimco Realty Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorReal EstateReal Estate
GICS IndustrySpecialized REITsRetail REITs
Market Capitalization13.43 billion USD14.65 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateOctober 14, 2013November 22, 1991
Security TypeREITREIT

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GLPI and KIM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GLPI vs. KIM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGLPIKIM
5-Day Price Return3.42%2.22%
13-Week Price Return-0.08%-0.18%
26-Week Price Return-3.71%-3.61%
52-Week Price Return-4.70%-3.00%
Month-to-Date Return4.15%1.88%
Year-to-Date Return-1.43%-7.68%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.62M3.54M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.66M4.53M
3-Month Volatility16.75%20.31%
Beta0.781.35

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GLPI

16.62%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
37.66%
Q3
20.19%
Median
8.96%
Q1
6.32%
Min
-1.71%

GLPI’s Return on Equity of 16.62% is on par with the norm for the Specialized REITs industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

KIM

5.66%

Retail REITs Industry

Max
15.84%
Q3
10.01%
Median
5.58%
Q1
2.80%
Min
-2.65%

KIM’s Return on Equity of 5.66% is on par with the norm for the Retail REITs industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

GLPI vs. KIM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Specialized REITs and Retail REITs industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GLPI

45.91%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
67.81%
Q3
40.70%
Median
25.91%
Q1
11.01%
Min
1.95%

In the Specialized REITs industry, Net Profit Margin is often not the primary profitability metric.

KIM

28.54%

Retail REITs Industry

Max
72.99%
Q3
48.25%
Median
27.21%
Q1
13.68%
Min
-25.48%

In the Retail REITs industry, Net Profit Margin is often not the primary profitability metric.

GLPI vs. KIM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Specialized REITs and Retail REITs industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GLPI

69.04%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
107.13%
Q3
55.10%
Median
41.03%
Q1
17.97%
Min
5.94%

In the Specialized REITs industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

KIM

32.62%

Retail REITs Industry

Max
102.11%
Q3
53.88%
Median
35.05%
Q1
20.90%
Min
-8.87%

In the Retail REITs industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

GLPI vs. KIM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Specialized REITs and Retail REITs industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGLPIKIM
Return on Equity (TTM)16.62%5.66%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.70%2.99%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)45.91%28.54%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)69.04%32.62%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)96.71%68.89%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GLPI

1.74

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
1.74
Q3
1.13
Median
0.59
Q1
0.35
Min
0.09

GLPI’s Current Ratio of 1.74 is in the upper quartile for the Specialized REITs industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

KIM

1.47

Retail REITs Industry

Max
1.54
Q3
0.87
Median
0.60
Q1
0.39
Min
0.04

KIM’s Current Ratio of 1.47 is in the upper quartile for the Retail REITs industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

GLPI vs. KIM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Specialized REITs and Retail REITs industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GLPI

1.53

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
4.54
Q3
3.26
Median
1.09
Q1
0.58
Min
0.16

GLPI’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.53 is typical for the Specialized REITs industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

KIM

0.78

Retail REITs Industry

Max
1.96
Q3
1.36
Median
0.93
Q1
0.64
Min
0.28

KIM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.78 is typical for the Retail REITs industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

GLPI vs. KIM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Specialized REITs and Retail REITs industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GLPI

3.52

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
5.24
Q3
4.05
Median
2.99
Q1
2.10
Min
1.28

GLPI’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.52 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Specialized REITs industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

KIM

2.05

Retail REITs Industry

Max
4.31
Q3
3.35
Median
2.33
Q1
1.37
Min
0.52

KIM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.05 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Retail REITs industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

GLPI vs. KIM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialized REITs and Retail REITs industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGLPIKIM
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.741.47
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.741.47
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.530.78
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)3.522.05

Growth

Revenue Growth

GLPI vs. KIM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GLPI vs. KIM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GLPI

6.38%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
7.06%
Q3
5.09%
Median
4.51%
Q1
3.18%
Min
1.78%

With a Dividend Yield of 6.38%, GLPI offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Specialized REITs industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

KIM

4.78%

Retail REITs Industry

Max
6.40%
Q3
4.96%
Median
4.61%
Q1
3.75%
Min
2.91%

KIM’s Dividend Yield of 4.78% is consistent with its peers in the Retail REITs industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

GLPI vs. KIM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Specialized REITs and Retail REITs industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GLPI

117.96%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
295.93%
Q3
182.11%
Median
119.31%
Q1
65.42%
Min
43.86%

GLPI’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 117.96% is within the typical range for the Specialized REITs industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

KIM

117.45%

Retail REITs Industry

Max
233.72%
Q3
148.83%
Median
90.03%
Q1
67.83%
Min
12.86%

KIM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 117.45% is within the typical range for the Retail REITs industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

GLPI vs. KIM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialized REITs and Retail REITs industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGLPIKIM
Dividend Yield (TTM)6.38%4.78%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)117.96%117.45%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GLPI

18.50

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
85.59
Q3
64.69
Median
29.09
Q1
18.22
Min
8.79

The P/E Ratio is often not the primary metric for valuation in the Specialized REITs industry.

KIM

24.58

Retail REITs Industry

Max
69.12
Q3
38.21
Median
21.85
Q1
15.96
Min
6.82

The P/E Ratio is often not the primary metric for valuation in the Retail REITs industry.

GLPI vs. KIM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialized REITs and Retail REITs industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GLPI

8.49

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
14.35
Q3
9.60
Median
8.74
Q1
5.61
Min
1.63

GLPI’s P/S Ratio of 8.49 aligns with the market consensus for the Specialized REITs industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

KIM

7.02

Retail REITs Industry

Max
13.84
Q3
9.05
Median
7.00
Q1
5.56
Min
2.93

KIM’s P/S Ratio of 7.02 aligns with the market consensus for the Retail REITs industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

GLPI vs. KIM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialized REITs and Retail REITs industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GLPI

2.82

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
11.33
Q3
5.68
Median
2.69
Q1
1.81
Min
0.71

GLPI’s P/B Ratio of 2.82 is within the conventional range for the Specialized REITs industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

KIM

1.35

Retail REITs Industry

Max
2.75
Q3
1.73
Median
1.08
Q1
0.87
Min
0.48

KIM’s P/B Ratio of 1.35 is within the conventional range for the Retail REITs industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

GLPI vs. KIM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Specialized REITs and Retail REITs industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGLPIKIM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)18.5024.58
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)8.497.02
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.821.35
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)24.9430.25