GIB vs. PS: CGI vs. Pershing Square Stock Comparison

Company Profile

CGI (GIB) and Pershing Square (PS) both fall under the Software & Services industry group, but GIB is classified in IT Services while PS is classified in Software.

CGI (GIB) has been public since October 7, 1998, giving it decades of market history across multiple cycles, while Pershing Square (PS) listed only on April 29, 2026 and lacks comparable through-cycle data.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Pershing Square (PS) has a highly aggressive beta of 6.25, indicating much higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, while CGI (GIB) is defensive at 0.40 and tends to be less market-sensitive — a wide gap in beta profiles.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Both GIB and PS need 1-year volatility and 1-year return to plot risk-return positioning.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Capital efficiency shows on one side only: CGI (GIB) earns 17.03% on shareholders’ equity, ranked against its industry; Pershing Square (PS) has no ROE this period.

Pershing Square (PS) reports a negative net margin of -20.98%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile CGI (GIB) reports 10.54%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Pershing Square (PS) reports a negative operating margin of -35.45%, usually indicating that operating costs exceeded revenue at the operating-income line. Meanwhile CGI (GIB) reports 16.22%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Pershing Square (PS) at 64.66% clears its industry range for revenue growth, far stronger top-line momentum than CGI (GIB) at 8.43%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.

Only one side can be read here: CGI (GIB) reports EPS growth of 0.55%, ranked against its industry; Pershing Square (PS) has no EPS growth figure this period.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

Short-term liquidity can only be read on one side of this pairing: CGI (GIB) shows current ratio of 0.94 against its industry benchmark, while Pershing Square (PS) has no reading this period.

Both CGI (GIB) at 0.44 and Pershing Square (PS) at 0.18 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Both CGI (GIB) at 0.80% and Pershing Square (PS) at 0.24% yield above their industries’ entire benchmark ranges — high enough that dividend safety, not income, becomes the first question.

Pershing Square (PS) reports a negative payout ratio of -10.99%, usually because earnings are negative; the payout ratio is not a useful dividend-sustainability benchmark in that state. Meanwhile CGI (GIB) reports 8.20%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

An earnings multiple is available for just one side: CGI (GIB) trades at 14.31 times trailing earnings, ranked against its peers, while Pershing Square (PS) has no P/E ratio this period.

CGI (GIB) at 1.05 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Pershing Square (PS) at 27.11 prices above its industry range — a wide gap in sales valuation between them.

CGI (GIB) at 2.37 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Pershing Square (PS) at 15.12 carries an above-peer premium to book — PS is pricier on assets.

Valuation Metrics