GIB vs. MSFT: CGI vs. Microsoft Stock Comparison
How do CGI (GIB) and Microsoft (MSFT) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
CGI (GIB) and Microsoft (MSFT) both fall under the Software & Services industry group, but GIB is classified in IT Services while MSFT is classified in Software.
| Profile Item | GIB | MSFT |
|---|---|---|
| Name | CGI Inc. | Microsoft Corporation Common Stock |
| Country/Region | Canada | United States |
| GICS Sector | Information Technology | Information Technology |
| GICS Industry Group | Software & Services | Software & Services |
| GICS Industry | IT Services | Software |
| GICS Sub-Industry | IT Consulting & Other Services | Systems Software |
| Market Capitalization | 17.25 billion USD | 3,940.41 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | Nasdaq |
| Listing Date | October 7, 1998 | March 13, 1986 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | GIB | MSFT |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | -3.23% | 10.30% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | -5.58% | 15.53% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | -1.91% | 11.01% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
Microsoft (MSFT) is heavily traded at around 22.95M shares per day, whereas CGI (GIB) sees a more moderate 400.74K — larger orders in the latter may require more patience and tighter control over order sizing.
| Metric | GIB | MSFT |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 31.53% | 33.91% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.40 | 1.03 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -49.61% | -37.15% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 400.74K | 22.95M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | GIB | MSFT |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.24 | 0.18 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.31 | 0.28 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Microsoft (MSFT) at 34.22% sits in the top ROE quartile, while CGI (GIB) at 17.03% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for MSFT.
GIB
Software & Services industry group
17.03%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 17.90%
- GIB
- 17.03%
- Median
- 6.59%
- Q1
- -9.59%
- Min
- -50.52%
MSFT
Software & Services industry group
34.22%
- Max
- 53.85%
- MSFT
- 34.22%
- Q3
- 17.90%
- Median
- 6.59%
- Q1
- -9.59%
- Min
- -50.52%
Net Margin (TTM)
Microsoft (MSFT) at 41.17% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of CGI (GIB) at 10.54%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
GIB
Software & Services industry group
10.54%
- Max
- 41.17%
- Q3
- 15.28%
- GIB
- 10.54%
- Median
- 4.63%
- Q1
- -5.42%
- Min
- -33.17%
MSFT
Software & Services industry group
41.17%
- MSFT
- 41.17%
- Max
- 41.17%
- Q3
- 15.28%
- Median
- 4.63%
- Q1
- -5.42%
- Min
- -33.17%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Microsoft (MSFT) at 49.76% turns sales into operating profit above its industry’s benchmark range, while CGI (GIB) at 16.22% operates around its industry’s norm.
GIB
Software & Services industry group
16.22%
- Max
- 46.89%
- Q3
- 17.64%
- GIB
- 16.22%
- Median
- 8.73%
- Q1
- -2.13%
- Min
- -30.45%
MSFT
Software & Services industry group
49.76%
- MSFT
- 49.76%
- Max
- 46.89%
- Q3
- 17.64%
- Median
- 8.73%
- Q1
- -2.13%
- Min
- -30.45%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | GIB | MSFT |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 17.03% | 34.22% |
| ROA (TTM) | 8.69% | 14.41% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 10.54% | 41.17% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 16.22% | 49.76% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 20.43% | 67.66% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both CGI (GIB) at 8.43% and Microsoft (MSFT) at 17.79% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Both CGI (GIB) at 0.55% and Microsoft (MSFT) at 31.60% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | GIB | MSFT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 8.43% | 17.79% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 7.34% | 16.12% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 0.55% | 31.60% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 6.76% | 22.86% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Microsoft (MSFT) at 1.23 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while CGI (GIB) at 0.94 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for GIB.
GIB
Software & Services industry group
0.94
- Max
- 5.11
- Q3
- 2.77
- Median
- 1.67
- Q1
- 1.01
- GIB
- 0.94
- Min
- 0.03
MSFT
Software & Services industry group
1.23
- Max
- 5.11
- Q3
- 2.77
- Median
- 1.67
- MSFT
- 1.23
- Q1
- 1.01
- Min
- 0.03
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both CGI (GIB) at 0.44 and Microsoft (MSFT) at 0.28 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
GIB
Software & Services industry group
0.44
- Max
- 2.52
- Q3
- 1.13
- GIB
- 0.44
- Median
- 0.40
- Q1
- 0.07
- Min
- 0.00
MSFT
Software & Services industry group
0.28
- Max
- 2.52
- Q3
- 1.13
- Median
- 0.40
- MSFT
- 0.28
- Q1
- 0.07
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | GIB | MSFT |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 0.94 | 1.23 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.44 | 0.28 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.31 | 0.34 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both CGI (GIB) at 0.80% and Microsoft (MSFT) at 0.69% yield above their industries’ entire benchmark ranges — high enough that dividend safety, not income, becomes the first question.
GIB
Software & Services industry group
0.80%
- GIB
- 0.80%
- Max
- 0.00%
- Q3
- 0.00%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
MSFT
Software & Services industry group
0.69%
- MSFT
- 0.69%
- Max
- 0.00%
- Q3
- 0.00%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both CGI (GIB) at 8.20% and Microsoft (MSFT) at 19.00% pay out more of their earnings than any of their industry peers — the thinnest cover in their groups, so dividend headroom deserves attention.
GIB
Software & Services industry group
8.20%
- GIB
- 8.20%
- Max
- 0.00%
- Q3
- 0.00%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
MSFT
Software & Services industry group
19.00%
- MSFT
- 19.00%
- Max
- 0.00%
- Q3
- 0.00%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | GIB | MSFT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.80% | 0.69% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 8.20% | 19.00% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
CGI (GIB) at 14.31 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Microsoft (MSFT) at 27.69 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for GIB, though growth and earnings durability still matter.
GIB
Software & Services industry group
14.31
- Max
- 112.94
- Q3
- 60.32
- Median
- 32.91
- Q1
- 18.77
- GIB
- 14.31
- Min
- 6.69
MSFT
Software & Services industry group
27.69
- Max
- 112.94
- Q3
- 60.32
- Median
- 32.91
- MSFT
- 27.69
- Q1
- 18.77
- Min
- 6.69
P/S Ratio (TTM)
CGI (GIB) at 1.05 looks cheap on sales in the lower P/S ratio quartile, while Microsoft (MSFT) at 11.37 looks rich in the upper quartile — a clear gap in price per dollar of revenue.
GIB
Software & Services industry group
1.05
- Max
- 17.91
- Q3
- 8.78
- Median
- 4.25
- Q1
- 2.23
- GIB
- 1.05
- Min
- 0.02
MSFT
Software & Services industry group
11.37
- Max
- 17.91
- MSFT
- 11.37
- Q3
- 8.78
- Median
- 4.25
- Q1
- 2.23
- Min
- 0.02
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
On P/B ratio, both CGI (GIB) at 2.37 and Microsoft (MSFT) at 8.38 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.
GIB
Software & Services industry group
2.37
- Max
- 16.63
- Q3
- 8.50
- Median
- 4.30
- GIB
- 2.37
- Q1
- 1.92
- Min
- -3.90
MSFT
Software & Services industry group
8.38
- Max
- 16.63
- Q3
- 8.50
- MSFT
- 8.38
- Median
- 4.30
- Q1
- 1.92
- Min
- -3.90
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | GIB | MSFT |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 14.31 | 27.69 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 1.05 | 11.37 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 2.37 | 8.38 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 12.68% | 0.08% |