MSFT vs. PS: Microsoft vs. Pershing Square Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Microsoft (MSFT) and Pershing Square (PS) both belong to the Software industry, though MSFT is classified under Systems Software while PS falls under Application Software.

Microsoft (MSFT) has been public since March 13, 1986, giving it decades of market history across multiple cycles, while Pershing Square (PS) listed only on April 29, 2026 and lacks comparable through-cycle data.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Pershing Square (PS) carries a highly aggressive beta of 6.25, indicating much higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, whereas Microsoft (MSFT) is closer to market-like at 1.03 — a noticeable difference in market-sensitivity profile.

Microsoft (MSFT) is heavily traded at around 22.95M shares per day, whereas Pershing Square (PS) sees a more moderate 428.47K — larger orders in the latter may require more patience and tighter control over order sizing.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Both MSFT and PS need 1-year volatility and 1-year return to plot risk-return positioning.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Capital efficiency shows on one side only: Microsoft (MSFT) earns 34.22% on shareholders’ equity, ranked against its industry; Pershing Square (PS) has no ROE this period.

Pershing Square (PS) reports a negative net margin of -20.98%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile Microsoft (MSFT) reports 41.17%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Pershing Square (PS) reports a negative operating margin of -35.45%, usually indicating that operating costs exceeded revenue at the operating-income line. Meanwhile Microsoft (MSFT) reports 49.76%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Pershing Square (PS) at 64.66% clears its industry range for revenue growth, far stronger top-line momentum than Microsoft (MSFT) at 17.79%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.

Only one side can be read here: Microsoft (MSFT) reports EPS growth of 31.60%, ranked against its industry; Pershing Square (PS) has no EPS growth figure this period.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

Short-term liquidity can only be read on one side of this pairing: Microsoft (MSFT) shows current ratio of 1.23 against its industry benchmark, while Pershing Square (PS) has no reading this period.

Both Microsoft (MSFT) at 0.28 and Pershing Square (PS) at 0.18 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Both Microsoft (MSFT) at 0.69% and Pershing Square (PS) at 0.24% yield above their industries’ entire benchmark ranges — high enough that dividend safety, not income, becomes the first question.

Pershing Square (PS) reports a negative payout ratio of -10.99%, usually because earnings are negative; the payout ratio is not a useful dividend-sustainability benchmark in that state. Meanwhile Microsoft (MSFT) reports 19.00%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

An earnings multiple is available for just one side: Microsoft (MSFT) trades at 27.69 times trailing earnings, ranked against its peers, while Pershing Square (PS) has no P/E ratio this period.

Both look expensive on sales: Microsoft (MSFT) at 11.37 sits in the upper P/S ratio quartile, and Pershing Square (PS) at 27.11 prices even higher, above its industry range.

Microsoft (MSFT) at 8.38 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Pershing Square (PS) at 15.12 carries an above-peer premium to book — PS is pricier on assets.

Valuation Metrics