FUTU vs. TROW: Futu vs. T. Rowe Price Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Futu (FUTU) and T. Rowe Price (TROW) both belong to the Capital Markets industry, though FUTU is classified under Investment Banking & Brokerage while TROW falls under Asset Management & Custody Banks.

T. Rowe Price (TROW) trades as ordinary local shares, while Futu (FUTU) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

T. Rowe Price (TROW) has an aggressive beta of 1.39, indicating higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, while Futu (FUTU) is defensive at 0.68 and tends to be less market-sensitive — they sit on opposite ends of the beta spectrum.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Futu (FUTU) at 30.52% sits in the top ROE quartile, while T. Rowe Price (TROW) at 18.20% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for FUTU.

For every dollar of sales, both Futu (FUTU) at 46.20% and T. Rowe Price (TROW) at 28.40% retain more as net profit than most peers, landing in the top net margin quartile of their industries.

Futu (FUTU) at 66.75% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of T. Rowe Price (TROW) at 38.60%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Futu (FUTU) at 68.11% clears its industry range for revenue growth, far stronger top-line momentum than T. Rowe Price (TROW) at 3.12%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.

Futu (FUTU) at 106.38% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while T. Rowe Price (TROW) at 0.98% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for FUTU.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Futu (FUTU) in Financial Services and T. Rowe Price (TROW) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Futu (FUTU) in Financial Services and T. Rowe Price (TROW) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Futu (FUTU) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile T. Rowe Price (TROW) reports a yield of 4.76%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Both Futu (FUTU) at 25.80% and T. Rowe Price (TROW) at 52.33% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Both Futu (FUTU) at 9.73 and T. Rowe Price (TROW) at 10.97 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.

Futu (FUTU) at 0.57 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while T. Rowe Price (TROW) at 3.00 prices around its industry’s middle — FUTU costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.

On P/B ratio, both Futu (FUTU) at 2.75 and T. Rowe Price (TROW) at 2.03 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.

Valuation Metrics