FUTU vs. STT: Futu vs. State Street Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Futu (FUTU) and State Street (STT) both belong to the Capital Markets industry, though FUTU is classified under Investment Banking & Brokerage while STT falls under Asset Management & Custody Banks.

State Street (STT) trades as ordinary local shares, while Futu (FUTU) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

State Street (STT) has an aggressive beta of 1.36, indicating higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, while Futu (FUTU) is defensive at 0.68 and tends to be less market-sensitive — they sit on opposite ends of the beta spectrum.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Futu (FUTU) at 30.52% sits in the top ROE quartile, while State Street (STT) at 13.08% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for FUTU.

Futu (FUTU) at 46.20% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of State Street (STT) at 23.78%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

Futu (FUTU) at 66.75% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of State Street (STT) at 34.63%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Futu (FUTU) at 68.11% clears its industry range for revenue growth, far stronger top-line momentum than State Street (STT) at 8.10%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.

Futu (FUTU) at 106.38% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while State Street (STT) at 14.49% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for FUTU.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Futu (FUTU) in Financial Services and State Street (STT) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Futu (FUTU) in Financial Services and State Street (STT) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Futu (FUTU) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile State Street (STT) reports a yield of 2.08%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Both Futu (FUTU) at 25.80% and State Street (STT) at 28.10% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Both Futu (FUTU) at 9.73 and State Street (STT) at 13.53 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.

Futu (FUTU) at 0.57 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while State Street (STT) at 2.91 prices around its industry’s middle — FUTU costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.

On P/B ratio, both Futu (FUTU) at 2.75 and State Street (STT) at 1.83 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.

Valuation Metrics