Seek Returns

FTI vs. PSX: TechnipFMC vs. Phillips 66 Stock Comparison

How do TechnipFMC (FTI) and Phillips 66 (PSX) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

TechnipFMC (FTI) and Phillips 66 (PSX) both fall under the Energy industry group, but FTI is classified in Energy Equipment & Services while PSX is classified in Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels.

Company profile comparison for TechnipFMC (FTI) and Phillips 66 (PSX)
Profile ItemFTIPSX
NameTechnipFMC plcPhillips 66
Country/RegionUnited KingdomUnited States
GICS SectorEnergyEnergy
GICS Industry GroupEnergyEnergy
GICS IndustryEnergy Equipment & ServicesOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
GICS Sub-IndustryOil & Gas Equipment & ServicesOil & Gas Refining & Marketing
Market Capitalization24.70 billion USD95.85 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 15, 2001April 12, 2012
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

FTI
PSX
GSPC
Loading price history…
TechnipFMC (FTI) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for TechnipFMC (FTI) and Phillips 66 (PSX). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for TechnipFMC (FTI) and Phillips 66 (PSX). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for TechnipFMC (FTI) and Phillips 66 (PSX)
MetricFTIPSX
Total Return (1Y)51.75%88.91%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)46.71%36.18%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)54.94%30.83%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

FTI
PSX
GSPC
Loading price history…
TechnipFMC (FTI) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for TechnipFMC (FTI) and Phillips 66 (PSX). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for TechnipFMC (FTI) and Phillips 66 (PSX)
MetricFTIPSX
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)32.65%33.42%
Beta (5Y)0.870.72
Max Drawdown (5Y)-36.71%-44.37%
Avg. Volume (3M)2.86M2.92M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
FTI and PSX are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for TechnipFMC (FTI) and Phillips 66 (PSX)
MetricFTIPSX
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)1.452.53
Sortino Ratio (1Y)2.113.93

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Both TechnipFMC (FTI) at 38.30% and Phillips 66 (PSX) at 39.84% sit in the top peer quartile for ROE, suggesting each generates more profit from shareholders’ equity than typical industry peers.

FTI

Energy industry group

38.30%

Max
53.85%
FTI
38.30%
Q3
24.79%
Median
12.85%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%

PSX

Energy industry group

39.84%

Max
53.85%
PSX
39.84%
Q3
24.79%
Median
12.85%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%
Loading chart…
TechnipFMC (FTI) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their ROE against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Both TechnipFMC (FTI) at 12.04% and Phillips 66 (PSX) at 7.48% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

FTI

Energy industry group

12.04%

Max
56.92%
Q3
22.92%
FTI
12.04%
Median
10.10%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%

PSX

Energy industry group

7.48%

Max
56.92%
Q3
22.92%
Median
10.10%
PSX
7.48%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%
Loading chart…
TechnipFMC (FTI) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their net margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both TechnipFMC (FTI) at 17.77% and Phillips 66 (PSX) at 13.17% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

FTI

Energy industry group

17.77%

Max
71.31%
Q3
33.75%
Median
18.73%
FTI
17.77%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%

PSX

Energy industry group

13.17%

Max
71.31%
Q3
33.75%
Median
18.73%
PSX
13.17%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%
Loading chart…
TechnipFMC (FTI) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their operating margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for TechnipFMC (FTI) and Phillips 66 (PSX)
MetricFTIPSX
ROE (TTM)38.30%39.84%
ROA (TTM)10.08%10.64%
Net Margin (TTM)12.04%7.48%
Operating Margin (TTM)17.77%13.17%
Gross Margin (TTM)23.60%15.08%

Growth

Revenue Growth

TechnipFMC (FTI) at 9.35% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Phillips 66 (PSX) at -7.53% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Loading chart…
TechnipFMC (FTI) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Phillips 66 (PSX) at 116.23% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while TechnipFMC (FTI) at 20.42% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for PSX.

Loading chart…
TechnipFMC (FTI) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for TechnipFMC (FTI) and Phillips 66 (PSX)
MetricFTIPSX
Revenue Growth (YoY)9.35%-7.53%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)14.02%-8.00%
EPS Growth (YoY)20.42%116.23%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)---22.60%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Both TechnipFMC (FTI) at 1.09 and Phillips 66 (PSX) at 1.34 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.

FTI

Energy industry group

1.09

Max
3.64
Q3
2.21
Median
1.41
FTI
1.09
Q1
0.88
Min
0.24

PSX

Energy industry group

1.34

Max
3.64
Q3
2.21
Median
1.41
PSX
1.34
Q1
0.88
Min
0.24
Loading chart…
TechnipFMC (FTI) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their current ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Both TechnipFMC (FTI) at 0.39 and Phillips 66 (PSX) at 0.52 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.

FTI

Energy industry group

0.39

Max
1.75
Q3
0.93
Median
0.54
FTI
0.39
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

PSX

Energy industry group

0.52

Max
1.75
Q3
0.93
Median
0.54
PSX
0.52
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
TechnipFMC (FTI) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for TechnipFMC (FTI) and Phillips 66 (PSX)
MetricFTIPSX
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.091.34
Debt / Equity (MRQ)0.390.52
Net Debt / EBITDA0.120.82

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both TechnipFMC (FTI) at 0.32% and Phillips 66 (PSX) at 2.03% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

FTI

Energy industry group

0.32%

Max
8.57%
Q3
3.58%
Median
1.71%
FTI
0.32%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PSX

Energy industry group

2.03%

Max
8.57%
Q3
3.58%
PSX
2.03%
Median
1.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
TechnipFMC (FTI) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Both TechnipFMC (FTI) at 6.29% and Phillips 66 (PSX) at 16.07% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

FTI

Energy industry group

6.29%

Max
133.24%
Q3
53.31%
Median
25.24%
FTI
6.29%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PSX

Energy industry group

16.07%

Max
133.24%
Q3
53.31%
Median
25.24%
PSX
16.07%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
TechnipFMC (FTI) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for TechnipFMC (FTI) and Phillips 66 (PSX)
MetricFTIPSX
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.32%2.03%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)6.29%16.07%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Both TechnipFMC (FTI) at 19.97 and Phillips 66 (PSX) at 7.88 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.

FTI

Energy industry group

19.97

Max
39.54
Q3
21.72
FTI
19.97
Median
12.19
Q1
7.71
Min
2.99

PSX

Energy industry group

7.88

Max
39.54
Q3
21.72
Median
12.19
PSX
7.88
Q1
7.71
Min
2.99
Loading chart…
TechnipFMC (FTI) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Phillips 66 (PSX) at 0.57 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while TechnipFMC (FTI) at 2.32 prices around its industry’s middle — PSX costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.

FTI

Energy industry group

2.32

Max
5.40
Q3
2.85
FTI
2.32
Median
1.69
Q1
0.88
Min
0.00

PSX

Energy industry group

0.57

Max
5.40
Q3
2.85
Median
1.69
Q1
0.88
PSX
0.57
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
TechnipFMC (FTI) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Both look rich against book: Phillips 66 (PSX) at 2.79 sits in the upper P/B ratio quartile, and TechnipFMC (FTI) at 7.44 prices even higher, above its industry range.

FTI

Energy industry group

7.44

FTI
7.44
Max
4.21
Q3
2.38
Median
1.51
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01

PSX

Energy industry group

2.79

Max
4.21
PSX
2.79
Q3
2.38
Median
1.51
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01
Loading chart…
TechnipFMC (FTI) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for TechnipFMC (FTI) and Phillips 66 (PSX)
MetricFTIPSX
P/E Ratio (TTM)19.977.88
P/S Ratio (TTM)2.320.57
P/B Ratio (MRQ)7.442.79
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)6.01%9.93%