FIS vs. NMR: Fidelity Natl Information Svcs vs. Nomura Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) and Nomura (NMR) both fall under the Financial Services industry group, but FIS is classified in Financial Services while NMR is classified in Capital Markets.

Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) trades as ordinary local shares, while Nomura (NMR) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) at 23.04% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Nomura (NMR) at 11.51% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for FIS.

Both Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) at 26.77% and Nomura (NMR) at 17.12% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

Both Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) at 22.93% and Nomura (NMR) at 24.36% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Both Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) at 5.43% and Nomura (NMR) at 10.80% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Nomura (NMR) at 7.17% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) at -72.03% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) in Financial Services and Nomura (NMR) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) in Financial Services and Nomura (NMR) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) at 5.85% earns its spot in the top quartile of its industry’s yields; Nomura (NMR) at 620.40% is past the top of its own peer range — territory where a dividend-safety check matters more than the headline number.

Both Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) at 25.71% and Nomura (NMR) at 16.85% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) at 4.29 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Nomura (NMR) at 10.83 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for FIS, though growth and earnings durability still matter.

Both Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) at 1.14 and Nomura (NMR) at 0.01 fetch a relatively low price per dollar of sales, landing in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile of their industries.

On P/B ratio, both Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) at 0.91 and Nomura (NMR) at 1.15 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.

Valuation Metrics