BRK.A vs. FIS: Berkshire Hathaway vs. Fidelity Natl Information Svcs Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A) and Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) both belong to the Financial Services industry, though BRK.A is classified under Multi-Sector Holdings while FIS falls under Transaction & Payment Processing Services.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) trades around 6.68M shares per day on average, while Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A) sees only 206 — a volume gap that can matter for position sizing, exit liquidity, and order execution.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) at 23.04% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A) at 12.12% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for FIS.

Both Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A) at 22.30% and Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) at 26.77% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

Both Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A) at 32.56% and Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) at 22.93% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) at 5.43% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A) at -3.23% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Both Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A) at -24.78% and Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) at -72.03% post bottom-quartile EPS growth versus peers, pointing to weaker earnings momentum than typical rivals.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A) in Financial Services and Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A) in Financial Services and Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) reports a yield of 5.85%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) reports a payout of 25.71%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) at 4.29 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A) at 14.36 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for FIS, though growth and earnings durability still matter.

Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) at 1.14 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A) at 3.18 prices around its industry’s middle — FIS costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.

On P/B ratio, both Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A) at 1.72 and Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) at 0.91 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.

Valuation Metrics