FIS vs. MS: Fidelity Natl Information Svcs vs. Morgan Stanley Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) and Morgan Stanley (MS) both fall under the Financial Services industry group, but FIS is classified in Financial Services while MS is classified in Capital Markets.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) at 23.04% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Morgan Stanley (MS) at 18.04% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for FIS.

Both Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) at 26.77% and Morgan Stanley (MS) at 25.63% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

Both Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) at 22.93% and Morgan Stanley (MS) at 39.00% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Both Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) at 5.43% and Morgan Stanley (MS) at 14.48% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Morgan Stanley (MS) at 28.43% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) at -72.03% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) in Financial Services and Morgan Stanley (MS) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) in Financial Services and Morgan Stanley (MS) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) at 5.85% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Morgan Stanley (MS) at 2.40% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, FIS the richer one.

Both Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) at 25.71% and Morgan Stanley (MS) at 32.91% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) at 4.29 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Morgan Stanley (MS) at 14.39 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for FIS, though growth and earnings durability still matter.

Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) at 1.14 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Morgan Stanley (MS) at 3.55 prices around its industry’s middle — FIS costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.

On P/B ratio, both Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) at 0.91 and Morgan Stanley (MS) at 2.65 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.

Valuation Metrics