FIS vs. GPN: Fidelity Natl Information Svcs vs. Global Payments Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) and Global Payments (GPN) are both classified in the Transaction & Payment Processing Services sub-industry within the broader Financial Services industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) at 23.04% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Global Payments (GPN) at 0.84% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in returns on equity.

Global Payments (GPN) reports a negative net margin of -11.21%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) reports 26.77%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Both Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) at 22.93% and Global Payments (GPN) at 15.73% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) at 5.43% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Global Payments (GPN) at -0.39% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Global Payments (GPN) at -6.17% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) at -72.03% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) in Financial Services and Global Payments (GPN) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) in Financial Services and Global Payments (GPN) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) at 5.85% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Global Payments (GPN) at 1.05% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, FIS the richer one.

Global Payments (GPN) reports payout ratio above 100% at 178.57%, meaning dividends exceeded current-period earnings and sustainability needs extra context. Meanwhile Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) reports 25.71%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) at 4.29 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Global Payments (GPN) at 173.93 trades above its peer range — a wide earnings-valuation gap relative to industry peers.

Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) at 1.14 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Global Payments (GPN) at 2.24 prices around its industry’s middle — FIS costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.

On P/B ratio, both Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) at 0.91 and Global Payments (GPN) at 1.11 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.

Valuation Metrics