FIG vs. PS: Figma vs. Pershing Square Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Figma (FIG) and Pershing Square (PS) are both classified in the Application Software sub-industry within the broader Software industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Pershing Square (PS) carries a highly aggressive beta of 6.25, indicating much higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, whereas Figma (FIG) is closer to market-like at 0.99 — a noticeable difference in market-sensitivity profile.

Figma (FIG) is heavily traded at around 13.00M shares per day, whereas Pershing Square (PS) sees a more moderate 428.47K — larger orders in the latter may require more patience and tighter control over order sizing.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Both FIG and PS need 1-year volatility and 1-year return to plot risk-return positioning.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Pershing Square (PS) has no ROE value reported for this period; Figma (FIG) reports a negative figure of -38.36%, which needs context because negative ROE can reflect losses or negative shareholders’ equity.

Both Figma (FIG) at -40.21% and Pershing Square (PS) at -20.98% report negative net margin values, usually indicating net losses over the period.

Both Figma (FIG) at -30.45% and Pershing Square (PS) at -35.45% report negative operating margin values, usually indicating operating losses over the period.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Both companies are growing quickly, but Pershing Square (PS) at 64.66% is the standout with revenue growth above its industry range; Figma (FIG) at 40.96% also sits in the top quartile.

Neither Figma (FIG) nor Pershing Square (PS) reports a EPS growth value for this period, so a direct comparison isn't possible.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

Short-term liquidity can only be read on one side of this pairing: Figma (FIG) shows current ratio of 2.45 against its industry benchmark, while Pershing Square (PS) has no reading this period.

Figma (FIG) at 0.07 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while Pershing Square (PS) at 0.18 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Figma (FIG) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Pershing Square (PS) reports a yield of 0.24%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Pershing Square (PS) reports a negative payout ratio of -10.99%, usually because earnings are negative; Figma (FIG) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%).

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Neither Figma (FIG) nor Pershing Square (PS) reports a P/E ratio value for this period, so a direct comparison isn’t possible.

Figma (FIG) at 7.20 prices around its industry’s typical P/S ratio, while Pershing Square (PS) at 27.11 clears its benchmark range — PS looks notably rich on sales.

Figma (FIG) at 6.52 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Pershing Square (PS) at 15.12 carries an above-peer premium to book — PS is pricier on assets.

Valuation Metrics