FIG vs. MSFT: Figma vs. Microsoft Stock Comparison
How do Figma (FIG) and Microsoft (MSFT) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Figma (FIG) and Microsoft (MSFT) both belong to the Software industry, though FIG is classified under Application Software while MSFT falls under Systems Software.
Microsoft (MSFT) carries decades of public-market history since March 13, 1986, while Figma (FIG) listed on July 31, 2025 — long-window comparisons have far more historical data on the MSFT side.
| Profile Item | FIG | MSFT |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Figma Inc. Class A Common Stock | Microsoft Corporation Common Stock |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Information Technology | Information Technology |
| GICS Industry Group | Software & Services | Software & Services |
| GICS Industry | Software | Software |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Application Software | Systems Software |
| Market Capitalization | 10.08 billion USD | 3,940.41 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | Nasdaq |
| Listing Date | July 31, 2025 | March 13, 1986 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | FIG | MSFT |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | -55.54% | 10.30% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | -- | 15.53% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | -- | 11.01% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | FIG | MSFT |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 76.91% | 33.91% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.99 | 1.03 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -86.20% | -37.15% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 13.00M | 22.95M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | FIG | MSFT |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.78 | 0.18 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -1.11 | 0.28 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Figma (FIG) reports a negative ROE of -38.36%; negative ROE can reflect losses or negative shareholders’ equity, so it is harder to read as capital efficiency. Meanwhile Microsoft (MSFT) reports 34.22%, ranking against industry peers normally.
FIG
Software & Services industry group
-38.36%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 17.90%
- Median
- 6.59%
- Q1
- -9.59%
- FIG
- -38.36%
- Min
- -50.52%
MSFT
Software & Services industry group
34.22%
- Max
- 53.85%
- MSFT
- 34.22%
- Q3
- 17.90%
- Median
- 6.59%
- Q1
- -9.59%
- Min
- -50.52%
Net Margin (TTM)
Figma (FIG) reports a negative net margin of -40.21%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile Microsoft (MSFT) reports 41.17%, ranking against industry peers normally.
FIG
Software & Services industry group
-40.21%
- Max
- 41.17%
- Q3
- 15.28%
- Median
- 4.63%
- Q1
- -5.42%
- Min
- -33.17%
- FIG
- -40.21%
MSFT
Software & Services industry group
41.17%
- MSFT
- 41.17%
- Max
- 41.17%
- Q3
- 15.28%
- Median
- 4.63%
- Q1
- -5.42%
- Min
- -33.17%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Figma (FIG) reports a negative operating margin of -30.45%, usually indicating that operating costs exceeded revenue at the operating-income line. Meanwhile Microsoft (MSFT) reports 49.76%, ranking against industry peers normally.
FIG
Software & Services industry group
-30.45%
- Max
- 46.89%
- Q3
- 17.64%
- Median
- 8.73%
- Q1
- -2.13%
- FIG
- -30.45%
- Min
- -30.45%
MSFT
Software & Services industry group
49.76%
- MSFT
- 49.76%
- Max
- 46.89%
- Q3
- 17.64%
- Median
- 8.73%
- Q1
- -2.13%
- Min
- -30.45%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | FIG | MSFT |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | -38.36% | 34.22% |
| ROA (TTM) | -15.53% | 14.41% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | -40.21% | 41.17% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | -30.45% | 49.76% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 81.38% | 67.66% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Figma (FIG) at 40.96% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Microsoft (MSFT) at 17.79% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for FIG.
EPS Growth
Only one side can be read here: Microsoft (MSFT) reports EPS growth of 31.60%, ranked against its industry; Figma (FIG) has no EPS growth figure this period.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | FIG | MSFT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 40.96% | 17.79% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -- | 16.12% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -- | 31.60% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -- | 22.86% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Figma (FIG) at 2.45 and Microsoft (MSFT) at 1.23 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.
FIG
Software & Services industry group
2.45
- Max
- 5.11
- Q3
- 2.77
- FIG
- 2.45
- Median
- 1.67
- Q1
- 1.01
- Min
- 0.03
MSFT
Software & Services industry group
1.23
- Max
- 5.11
- Q3
- 2.77
- Median
- 1.67
- MSFT
- 1.23
- Q1
- 1.01
- Min
- 0.03
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Figma (FIG) at 0.07 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while Microsoft (MSFT) at 0.28 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.
FIG
Software & Services industry group
0.07
- Max
- 2.52
- Q3
- 1.13
- Median
- 0.40
- Q1
- 0.07
- FIG
- 0.07
- Min
- 0.00
MSFT
Software & Services industry group
0.28
- Max
- 2.52
- Q3
- 1.13
- Median
- 0.40
- MSFT
- 0.28
- Q1
- 0.07
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | FIG | MSFT |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 2.45 | 1.23 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.07 | 0.28 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -- | 0.34 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Figma (FIG) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Microsoft (MSFT) reports a yield of 0.69%, ranking against industry peers normally.
FIG
Software & Services industry group
0.00%
- FIG
- 0.00%
- Max
- 0.00%
- Q3
- 0.00%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
MSFT
Software & Services industry group
0.69%
- MSFT
- 0.69%
- Max
- 0.00%
- Q3
- 0.00%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Figma (FIG) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Microsoft (MSFT) reports a payout of 19.00%, ranking against industry peers normally.
FIG
Software & Services industry group
0.00%
- FIG
- 0.00%
- Max
- 0.00%
- Q3
- 0.00%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
MSFT
Software & Services industry group
19.00%
- MSFT
- 19.00%
- Max
- 0.00%
- Q3
- 0.00%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | FIG | MSFT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.69% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 0.00% | 19.00% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
An earnings multiple is available for just one side: Microsoft (MSFT) trades at 27.69 times trailing earnings, ranked against its peers, while Figma (FIG) has no P/E ratio this period.
FIG
Software & Services industry group
--
- Max
- 112.94
- Q3
- 60.32
- Median
- 32.91
- Q1
- 18.77
- Min
- 6.69
- FIG
- --
MSFT
Software & Services industry group
27.69
- Max
- 112.94
- Q3
- 60.32
- Median
- 32.91
- MSFT
- 27.69
- Q1
- 18.77
- Min
- 6.69
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Figma (FIG) at 7.20 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Microsoft (MSFT) at 11.37 sits in the pricier quartile — MSFT costs more per dollar of sales.
FIG
Software & Services industry group
7.20
- Max
- 17.91
- Q3
- 8.78
- FIG
- 7.20
- Median
- 4.25
- Q1
- 2.23
- Min
- 0.02
MSFT
Software & Services industry group
11.37
- Max
- 17.91
- MSFT
- 11.37
- Q3
- 8.78
- Median
- 4.25
- Q1
- 2.23
- Min
- 0.02
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
On P/B ratio, both Figma (FIG) at 6.52 and Microsoft (MSFT) at 8.38 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.
FIG
Software & Services industry group
6.52
- Max
- 16.63
- Q3
- 8.50
- FIG
- 6.52
- Median
- 4.30
- Q1
- 1.92
- Min
- -3.90
MSFT
Software & Services industry group
8.38
- Max
- 16.63
- Q3
- 8.50
- MSFT
- 8.38
- Median
- 4.30
- Q1
- 1.92
- Min
- -3.90
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | FIG | MSFT |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | -- | 27.69 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 7.20 | 11.37 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 6.52 | 8.38 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 4.83% | 0.08% |