FICO vs. IBM: Fair Isaac vs. IBM Stock Comparison
How do Fair Isaac (FICO) and IBM (IBM) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Fair Isaac (FICO) and IBM (IBM) both fall under the Software & Services industry group, but FICO is classified in Software while IBM is classified in IT Services.
| Profile Item | FICO | IBM |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Fair Isaac Corp. | International Business Machines Corporation |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Information Technology | Information Technology |
| GICS Industry Group | Software & Services | Software & Services |
| GICS Industry | Software | IT Services |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Application Software | IT Consulting & Other Services |
| Market Capitalization | 15.22 billion USD | 231.55 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | July 22, 1987 | January 2, 1962 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | FICO | IBM |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | -58.54% | -16.98% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | -9.17% | 22.40% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 12.31% | 19.64% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | FICO | IBM |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 63.29% | 48.48% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.33 | 0.79 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -75.13% | -37.50% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 759.34K | 5.30M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | FICO | IBM |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.99 | -0.44 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -1.20 | -0.56 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Capital efficiency shows on one side only: IBM (IBM) earns 34.77% on shareholders’ equity, ranked against its industry; Fair Isaac (FICO) has no ROE this period.
FICO
Software & Services industry group
--
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 17.90%
- Median
- 6.59%
- Q1
- -9.59%
- Min
- -50.52%
- FICO
- --
IBM
Software & Services industry group
34.77%
- Max
- 53.85%
- IBM
- 34.77%
- Q3
- 17.90%
- Median
- 6.59%
- Q1
- -9.59%
- Min
- -50.52%
Net Margin (TTM)
For every dollar of sales, both Fair Isaac (FICO) at 32.94% and IBM (IBM) at 15.99% retain more as net profit than most peers, landing in the top net margin quartile of their industries.
FICO
Software & Services industry group
32.94%
- Max
- 41.17%
- FICO
- 32.94%
- Q3
- 15.28%
- Median
- 4.63%
- Q1
- -5.42%
- Min
- -33.17%
IBM
Software & Services industry group
15.99%
- Max
- 41.17%
- IBM
- 15.99%
- Q3
- 15.28%
- Median
- 4.63%
- Q1
- -5.42%
- Min
- -33.17%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Fair Isaac (FICO) at 44.72% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of IBM (IBM) at 16.97%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
FICO
Software & Services industry group
44.72%
- Max
- 46.89%
- FICO
- 44.72%
- Q3
- 17.64%
- Median
- 8.73%
- Q1
- -2.13%
- Min
- -30.45%
IBM
Software & Services industry group
16.97%
- Max
- 46.89%
- Q3
- 17.64%
- IBM
- 16.97%
- Median
- 8.73%
- Q1
- -2.13%
- Min
- -30.45%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | FICO | IBM |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | -- | 34.77% |
| ROA (TTM) | 40.99% | 5.33% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 32.94% | 15.99% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 44.72% | 16.97% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 86.13% | 57.97% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Fair Isaac (FICO) at 27.33% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while IBM (IBM) at 7.62% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for FICO.
EPS Growth
IBM (IBM) at 73.72% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Fair Isaac (FICO) at 36.85% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for IBM.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | FICO | IBM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 27.33% | 7.62% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 18.76% | 3.72% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 36.85% | 73.72% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 28.97% | 83.76% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Fair Isaac (FICO) at 0.99 and IBM (IBM) at 0.86 run current ratio in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.
FICO
Software & Services industry group
0.99
- Max
- 5.11
- Q3
- 2.77
- Median
- 1.67
- Q1
- 1.01
- FICO
- 0.99
- Min
- 0.03
IBM
Software & Services industry group
0.86
- Max
- 5.11
- Q3
- 2.77
- Median
- 1.67
- Q1
- 1.01
- IBM
- 0.86
- Min
- 0.03
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Only one side’s leverage can be read here: IBM (IBM) carries debt-to-equity ratio of 1.85 against its industry range, while Fair Isaac (FICO) reports no figure this period.
FICO
Software & Services industry group
--
- Max
- 2.52
- Q3
- 1.13
- Median
- 0.40
- Q1
- 0.07
- Min
- 0.00
- FICO
- --
IBM
Software & Services industry group
1.85
- Max
- 2.52
- IBM
- 1.85
- Q3
- 1.13
- Median
- 0.40
- Q1
- 0.07
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | FICO | IBM |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 0.99 | 0.86 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | -- | 1.85 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 3.86 | 3.37 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Fair Isaac (FICO) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile IBM (IBM) reports a yield of 2.73%, ranking against industry peers normally.
FICO
Software & Services industry group
0.00%
- FICO
- 0.00%
- Max
- 0.00%
- Q3
- 0.00%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
IBM
Software & Services industry group
2.73%
- IBM
- 2.73%
- Max
- 0.00%
- Q3
- 0.00%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Fair Isaac (FICO) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile IBM (IBM) reports a payout of 57.51%, ranking against industry peers normally.
FICO
Software & Services industry group
0.00%
- FICO
- 0.00%
- Max
- 0.00%
- Q3
- 0.00%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
IBM
Software & Services industry group
57.51%
- IBM
- 57.51%
- Max
- 0.00%
- Q3
- 0.00%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | FICO | IBM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 2.73% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 0.00% | 57.51% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Fair Isaac (FICO) at 19.40 and IBM (IBM) at 20.90 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
FICO
Software & Services industry group
19.40
- Max
- 112.94
- Q3
- 60.32
- Median
- 32.91
- FICO
- 19.40
- Q1
- 18.77
- Min
- 6.69
IBM
Software & Services industry group
20.90
- Max
- 112.94
- Q3
- 60.32
- Median
- 32.91
- IBM
- 20.90
- Q1
- 18.77
- Min
- 6.69
P/S Ratio (TTM)
On P/S ratio, both Fair Isaac (FICO) at 6.00 and IBM (IBM) at 3.31 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.
FICO
Software & Services industry group
6.00
- Max
- 17.91
- Q3
- 8.78
- FICO
- 6.00
- Median
- 4.25
- Q1
- 2.23
- Min
- 0.02
IBM
Software & Services industry group
3.31
- Max
- 17.91
- Q3
- 8.78
- Median
- 4.25
- IBM
- 3.31
- Q1
- 2.23
- Min
- 0.02
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Fair Isaac (FICO) reports a negative P/B ratio of -3.90, meaning negative book equity — the multiple itself is not meaningful for valuation. Meanwhile IBM (IBM) reports 6.52, ranking against industry peers normally.
FICO
Software & Services industry group
-3.90
- Max
- 16.63
- Q3
- 8.50
- Median
- 4.30
- Q1
- 1.92
- FICO
- -3.90
- Min
- -3.90
IBM
Software & Services industry group
6.52
- Max
- 16.63
- Q3
- 8.50
- IBM
- 6.52
- Median
- 4.30
- Q1
- 1.92
- Min
- -3.90
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | FICO | IBM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 19.40 | 20.90 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 6.00 | 3.31 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | -3.90 | 6.52 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 6.54% | 5.34% |