Seek Returns logo

IBM vs. MSFT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at IBM and MSFT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolIBMMSFT
Company NameInternational Business Machines CorporationMicrosoft Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustryIT ServicesSoftware
Market Capitalization268.90 billion USD3,863.09 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateJanuary 2, 1962March 13, 1986
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of IBM and MSFT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

IBM vs. MSFT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolIBMMSFT
5-Day Price Return5.47%2.50%
13-Week Price Return-4.28%5.62%
26-Week Price Return12.71%33.06%
52-Week Price Return27.77%20.78%
Month-to-Date Return15.88%0.34%
Year-to-Date Return28.35%23.30%
10-Day Avg. Volume6.49M21.67M
3-Month Avg. Volume4.69M20.04M
3-Month Volatility26.73%16.30%
Beta0.691.07

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

IBM

21.99%

IT Services Industry

Max
32.78%
Q3
19.28%
Median
13.86%
Q1
5.50%
Min
-10.00%

In the upper quartile for the IT Services industry, IBM’s Return on Equity of 21.99% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

MSFT

32.44%

Software Industry

Max
66.28%
Q3
21.28%
Median
9.33%
Q1
-8.77%
Min
-48.16%

In the upper quartile for the Software industry, MSFT’s Return on Equity of 32.44% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

IBM vs. MSFT: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

IBM

9.11%

IT Services Industry

Max
19.71%
Q3
11.01%
Median
6.66%
Q1
2.96%
Min
-6.22%

IBM’s Net Profit Margin of 9.11% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the IT Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

MSFT

36.15%

Software Industry

Max
51.92%
Q3
19.23%
Median
6.98%
Q1
-7.14%
Min
-41.00%

A Net Profit Margin of 36.15% places MSFT in the upper quartile for the Software industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

IBM vs. MSFT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

IBM

9.77%

IT Services Industry

Max
22.44%
Q3
14.90%
Median
8.82%
Q1
4.91%
Min
-9.89%

IBM’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.77% is around the midpoint for the IT Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

MSFT

45.29%

Software Industry

Max
60.40%
Q3
21.25%
Median
9.90%
Q1
-4.97%
Min
-43.50%

An Operating Profit Margin of 45.29% places MSFT in the upper quartile for the Software industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

IBM vs. MSFT: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolIBMMSFT
Return on Equity (TTM)21.99%32.44%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.12%18.20%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)9.11%36.15%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)9.77%45.29%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)57.57%68.82%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

IBM

0.91

IT Services Industry

Max
3.17
Q3
2.00
Median
1.47
Q1
1.05
Min
0.52

IBM’s Current Ratio of 0.91 falls into the lower quartile for the IT Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

MSFT

1.35

Software Industry

Max
4.29
Q3
2.37
Median
1.40
Q1
1.03
Min
0.25

MSFT’s Current Ratio of 1.35 aligns with the median group of the Software industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

IBM vs. MSFT: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

IBM

2.33

IT Services Industry

Max
3.11
Q3
1.55
Median
0.55
Q1
0.17
Min
0.00

IBM’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the IT Services industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.33. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

MSFT

0.26

Software Industry

Max
2.16
Q3
0.86
Median
0.31
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

MSFT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.26 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

IBM vs. MSFT: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

IBM

45.57

IT Services Industry

Max
129.00
Q3
56.00
Median
11.69
Q1
0.77
Min
-28.15

IBM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 45.57 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the IT Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MSFT

891.80

Software Industry

Max
89.65
Q3
32.64
Median
1.00
Q1
-9.84
Min
-71.23

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 891.80, MSFT demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Software industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

IBM vs. MSFT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolIBMMSFT
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.911.35
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.801.35
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.330.26
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)45.57891.80

Growth

Revenue Growth

IBM vs. MSFT: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

IBM vs. MSFT: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

IBM

2.35%

IT Services Industry

Max
2.79%
Q3
1.76%
Median
0.58%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 2.35%, IBM offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the IT Services industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

MSFT

0.63%

Software Industry

Max
0.22%
Q3
0.11%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MSFT’s Dividend Yield of 0.63% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Software industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

IBM vs. MSFT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

IBM

75.57%

IT Services Industry

Max
107.85%
Q3
52.62%
Median
22.53%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

IBM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 75.57% is in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

MSFT

23.65%

Software Industry

Max
3.29%
Q3
2.41%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

At 23.65%, MSFT’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Software industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

IBM vs. MSFT: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolIBMMSFT
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.35%0.63%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)75.57%23.65%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

IBM

45.14

IT Services Industry

Max
56.41
Q3
33.17
Median
23.17
Q1
16.18
Min
6.62

A P/E Ratio of 45.14 places IBM in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

MSFT

37.47

Software Industry

Max
145.74
Q3
94.88
Median
45.35
Q1
26.66
Min
8.80

MSFT’s P/E Ratio of 37.47 is within the middle range for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

IBM vs. MSFT: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

IBM

4.11

IT Services Industry

Max
5.99
Q3
4.26
Median
1.93
Q1
0.97
Min
0.12

IBM’s P/S Ratio of 4.11 aligns with the market consensus for the IT Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MSFT

13.54

Software Industry

Max
25.67
Q3
13.68
Median
8.28
Q1
4.95
Min
0.90

MSFT’s P/S Ratio of 13.54 aligns with the market consensus for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

IBM vs. MSFT: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

IBM

9.96

IT Services Industry

Max
12.34
Q3
7.54
Median
3.84
Q1
2.52
Min
0.88

IBM’s P/B Ratio of 9.96 is in the upper tier for the IT Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

MSFT

10.76

Software Industry

Max
30.67
Q3
14.92
Median
8.52
Q1
3.89
Min
0.38

MSFT’s P/B Ratio of 10.76 is within the conventional range for the Software industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

IBM vs. MSFT: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolIBMMSFT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)45.1437.47
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.1113.54
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)9.9610.76
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)22.4053.28