Seek Returns

FANG vs. WDS: Diamondback Energy vs. Woodside Energy Stock Comparison

How do Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Woodside Energy (WDS) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Woodside Energy (WDS) are both classified in the Oil & Gas Exploration & Production sub-industry within the broader Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

Diamondback Energy (FANG) trades as ordinary local shares, while Woodside Energy (WDS) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Company profile comparison for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Woodside Energy (WDS)
Profile ItemFANGWDS
NameDiamondback Energy Inc.Woodside Energy Group Ltd ADR
Country/RegionUnited StatesAustralia
GICS SectorEnergyEnergy
GICS Industry GroupEnergyEnergy
GICS IndustryOil, Gas & Consumable FuelsOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
GICS Sub-IndustryOil & Gas Exploration & ProductionOil & Gas Exploration & Production
Market Capitalization49.96 billion USD40.00 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNasdaqNYSE
Listing DateOctober 12, 2012November 18, 1996
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

FANG
WDS
GSPC
Loading price history…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Woodside Energy (WDS), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Woodside Energy (WDS). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Woodside Energy (WDS). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Woodside Energy (WDS)
MetricFANGWDS
Total Return (1Y)26.99%30.30%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)8.52%5.67%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)14.17%11.65%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

FANG
WDS
GSPC
Loading price history…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Woodside Energy (WDS), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Woodside Energy (WDS). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Woodside Energy (WDS)
MetricFANGWDS
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)33.77%33.53%
Beta (5Y)0.530.38
Max Drawdown (5Y)-42.10%-48.77%
Avg. Volume (3M)2.38M570.04K

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
FANG and WDS are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Woodside Energy (WDS)
MetricFANGWDS
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)0.670.78
Sortino Ratio (1Y)0.971.11

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Both Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 4.86% and Woodside Energy (WDS) at 7.68% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

FANG

Energy industry group

4.86%

Max
53.85%
Q3
24.79%
Median
12.85%
FANG
4.86%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%

WDS

Energy industry group

7.68%

Max
53.85%
Q3
24.79%
Median
12.85%
WDS
7.68%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%
Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Woodside Energy (WDS): A comparison of their ROE against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Both Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 11.62% and Woodside Energy (WDS) at 22.21% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

FANG

Energy industry group

11.62%

Max
56.92%
Q3
22.92%
FANG
11.62%
Median
10.10%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%

WDS

Energy industry group

22.21%

Max
56.92%
Q3
22.92%
WDS
22.21%
Median
10.10%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%
Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Woodside Energy (WDS): A comparison of their net margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 44.95% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Woodside Energy (WDS) at 23.91%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

FANG

Energy industry group

44.95%

Max
71.31%
FANG
44.95%
Q3
33.75%
Median
18.73%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%

WDS

Energy industry group

23.91%

Max
71.31%
Q3
33.75%
WDS
23.91%
Median
18.73%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%
Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Woodside Energy (WDS): A comparison of their operating margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Woodside Energy (WDS)
MetricFANGWDS
ROE (TTM)4.86%7.68%
ROA (TTM)2.07%2.83%
Net Margin (TTM)11.62%22.21%
Operating Margin (TTM)44.95%23.91%
Gross Margin (TTM)73.62%34.92%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 35.44% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Woodside Energy (WDS) at -1.48% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for FANG.

Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Woodside Energy (WDS): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Woodside Energy (WDS) at -24.02% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at -63.10% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.

Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Woodside Energy (WDS): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Woodside Energy (WDS)
MetricFANGWDS
Revenue Growth (YoY)35.44%-1.48%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)15.99%-8.26%
EPS Growth (YoY)-63.10%-24.02%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)-38.48%-30.68%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Woodside Energy (WDS) at 1.39 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 0.55 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for FANG.

FANG

Energy industry group

0.55

Max
3.64
Q3
2.21
Median
1.41
Q1
0.88
FANG
0.55
Min
0.24

WDS

Energy industry group

1.39

Max
3.64
Q3
2.21
Median
1.41
WDS
1.39
Q1
0.88
Min
0.24
Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Woodside Energy (WDS): A comparison of their current ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 0.29 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while Woodside Energy (WDS) at 0.33 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.

FANG

Energy industry group

0.29

Max
1.75
Q3
0.93
Median
0.54
Q1
0.30
FANG
0.29
Min
0.00

WDS

Energy industry group

0.33

Max
1.75
Q3
0.93
Median
0.54
WDS
0.33
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Woodside Energy (WDS): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Woodside Energy (WDS)
MetricFANGWDS
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.551.39
Debt / Equity (MRQ)0.290.33
Net Debt / EBITDA0.991.15

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Woodside Energy (WDS) at 5.41% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 2.47% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, WDS the richer one.

FANG

Energy industry group

2.47%

Max
8.57%
Q3
3.58%
FANG
2.47%
Median
1.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

WDS

Energy industry group

5.41%

Max
8.57%
WDS
5.41%
Q3
3.58%
Median
1.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Woodside Energy (WDS): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Both Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 57.20% and Woodside Energy (WDS) at 69.78% pay out an above-typical share of earnings for their industries, leaving thinner cover if profits dip.

FANG

Energy industry group

57.20%

Max
133.24%
FANG
57.20%
Q3
53.31%
Median
25.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

WDS

Energy industry group

69.78%

Max
133.24%
WDS
69.78%
Q3
53.31%
Median
25.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Woodside Energy (WDS): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Woodside Energy (WDS)
MetricFANGWDS
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.47%5.41%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)57.20%69.78%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Woodside Energy (WDS) at 13.15 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 24.09 sits in the richer quartile — FANG needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.

FANG

Energy industry group

24.09

Max
39.54
FANG
24.09
Q3
21.72
Median
12.19
Q1
7.71
Min
2.99

WDS

Energy industry group

13.15

Max
39.54
Q3
21.72
WDS
13.15
Median
12.19
Q1
7.71
Min
2.99
Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Woodside Energy (WDS): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 2.83 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Woodside Energy (WDS) at 2.89 sits in the pricier quartile — WDS costs more per dollar of sales.

FANG

Energy industry group

2.83

Max
5.40
Q3
2.85
FANG
2.83
Median
1.69
Q1
0.88
Min
0.00

WDS

Energy industry group

2.89

Max
5.40
WDS
2.89
Q3
2.85
Median
1.69
Q1
0.88
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Woodside Energy (WDS): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

On P/B ratio, both Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 1.28 and Woodside Energy (WDS) at 1.11 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.

FANG

Energy industry group

1.28

Max
4.21
Q3
2.38
Median
1.51
FANG
1.28
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01

WDS

Energy industry group

1.11

Max
4.21
Q3
2.38
Median
1.51
WDS
1.11
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01
Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Woodside Energy (WDS): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Woodside Energy (WDS)
MetricFANGWDS
P/E Ratio (TTM)24.0913.15
P/S Ratio (TTM)2.832.89
P/B Ratio (MRQ)1.281.11
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)12.09%1.41%