WDS vs. XOM: Woodside Energy vs. ExxonMobil Stock Comparison
How do Woodside Energy (WDS) and ExxonMobil (XOM) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Woodside Energy (WDS) and ExxonMobil (XOM) both belong to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, though WDS is classified under Oil & Gas Exploration & Production while XOM falls under Integrated Oil & Gas.
ExxonMobil (XOM) trades as ordinary local shares, while Woodside Energy (WDS) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.
| Profile Item | WDS | XOM |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Woodside Energy Group Ltd ADR | ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation |
| Country/Region | Australia | United States |
| GICS Sector | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry Group | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Integrated Oil & Gas |
| Market Capitalization | 40.00 billion USD | 676.62 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | November 18, 1996 | January 2, 1962 |
| Security Type | ADR | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | WDS | XOM |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 30.30% | 44.48% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 5.67% | 20.83% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 11.65% | 24.20% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
ExxonMobil (XOM) is heavily traded at around 13.57M shares per day, whereas Woodside Energy (WDS) sees a more moderate 570.04K — larger orders in the latter may require more patience and tighter control over order sizing.
| Metric | WDS | XOM |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 33.53% | 27.17% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.38 | 0.19 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -48.77% | -20.51% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 570.04K | 13.57M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | WDS | XOM |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.78 | 1.48 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 1.11 | 2.17 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both Woodside Energy (WDS) at 7.68% and ExxonMobil (XOM) at 15.53% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
WDS
Energy industry group
7.68%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- WDS
- 7.68%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
XOM
Energy industry group
15.53%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- XOM
- 15.53%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both Woodside Energy (WDS) at 22.21% and ExxonMobil (XOM) at 10.46% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
WDS
Energy industry group
22.21%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- WDS
- 22.21%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
XOM
Energy industry group
10.46%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- XOM
- 10.46%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Woodside Energy (WDS) at 23.91% and ExxonMobil (XOM) at 16.98% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
WDS
Energy industry group
23.91%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- WDS
- 23.91%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
XOM
Energy industry group
16.98%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- Median
- 18.73%
- XOM
- 16.98%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | WDS | XOM |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 7.68% | 15.53% |
| ROA (TTM) | 2.83% | 6.75% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 22.21% | 10.46% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 23.91% | 16.98% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 34.92% | 29.81% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Woodside Energy (WDS) at -1.48% and ExxonMobil (XOM) at -4.52% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Both Woodside Energy (WDS) at -24.02% and ExxonMobil (XOM) at -14.54% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | WDS | XOM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -1.48% | -4.52% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -8.26% | -6.69% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -24.02% | -14.54% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -30.68% | -20.35% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Woodside Energy (WDS) at 1.39 and ExxonMobil (XOM) at 1.19 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.
WDS
Energy industry group
1.39
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- WDS
- 1.39
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
XOM
Energy industry group
1.19
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- XOM
- 1.19
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
ExxonMobil (XOM) at 0.13 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while Woodside Energy (WDS) at 0.33 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.
WDS
Energy industry group
0.33
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- WDS
- 0.33
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
XOM
Energy industry group
0.13
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- XOM
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | WDS | XOM |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.39 | 1.19 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.33 | 0.13 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.15 | 0.28 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Woodside Energy (WDS) at 5.41% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while ExxonMobil (XOM) at 2.49% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, WDS the richer one.
WDS
Energy industry group
5.41%
- Max
- 8.57%
- WDS
- 5.41%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
XOM
Energy industry group
2.49%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- XOM
- 2.49%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
ExxonMobil (XOM) at 42.39% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Woodside Energy (WDS) at 69.78% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
WDS
Energy industry group
69.78%
- Max
- 133.24%
- WDS
- 69.78%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
XOM
Energy industry group
42.39%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- XOM
- 42.39%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | WDS | XOM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 5.41% | 2.49% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 69.78% | 42.39% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Woodside Energy (WDS) at 13.15 and ExxonMobil (XOM) at 17.06 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
WDS
Energy industry group
13.15
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- WDS
- 13.15
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
XOM
Energy industry group
17.06
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- XOM
- 17.06
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
P/S Ratio (TTM)
ExxonMobil (XOM) at 1.74 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Woodside Energy (WDS) at 2.89 sits in the pricier quartile — WDS costs more per dollar of sales.
WDS
Energy industry group
2.89
- Max
- 5.40
- WDS
- 2.89
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
XOM
Energy industry group
1.74
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- XOM
- 1.74
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Woodside Energy (WDS) at 1.11 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while ExxonMobil (XOM) at 2.55 carries an above-peer premium to book — XOM is pricier on assets.
WDS
Energy industry group
1.11
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- WDS
- 1.11
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
XOM
Energy industry group
2.55
- Max
- 4.21
- XOM
- 2.55
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | WDS | XOM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 13.15 | 17.06 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 2.89 | 1.74 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 1.11 | 2.55 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 1.41% | 4.19% |