FANG vs. SHEL: Diamondback Energy vs. Shell Stock Comparison
How do Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Shell (SHEL) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Shell (SHEL) both belong to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, though FANG is classified under Oil & Gas Exploration & Production while SHEL falls under Integrated Oil & Gas.
Diamondback Energy (FANG) trades as ordinary local shares, while Shell (SHEL) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.
| Profile Item | FANG | SHEL |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Diamondback Energy Inc. | Shell plc American Depositary Shares (Each representing two Ordinary shares) |
| Country/Region | United States | United Kingdom |
| GICS Sector | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry Group | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Integrated Oil & Gas |
| Market Capitalization | 49.96 billion USD | 280.59 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | Nasdaq | NYSE |
| Listing Date | October 12, 2012 | March 12, 1984 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | ADR |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | FANG | SHEL |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 26.99% | 36.30% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 8.52% | 19.93% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 14.17% | 21.02% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | FANG | SHEL |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 33.77% | 23.60% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.53 | 0.10 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -42.10% | -25.04% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 2.38M | 6.01M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | FANG | SHEL |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.67 | 1.36 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 0.97 | 1.99 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 4.86% and Shell (SHEL) at 17.43% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
FANG
Energy industry group
4.86%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- FANG
- 4.86%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
SHEL
Energy industry group
17.43%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- SHEL
- 17.43%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 11.62% and Shell (SHEL) at 10.18% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
FANG
Energy industry group
11.62%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- FANG
- 11.62%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
SHEL
Energy industry group
10.18%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- SHEL
- 10.18%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 44.95% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Shell (SHEL) at 18.76%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
FANG
Energy industry group
44.95%
- Max
- 71.31%
- FANG
- 44.95%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
SHEL
Energy industry group
18.76%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- SHEL
- 18.76%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | FANG | SHEL |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 4.86% | 17.43% |
| ROA (TTM) | 2.07% | 7.67% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 11.62% | 10.18% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 44.95% | 18.76% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 73.62% | 26.93% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 35.44% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Shell (SHEL) at -6.13% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for FANG.
EPS Growth
Shell (SHEL) at 18.58% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at -63.10% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | FANG | SHEL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 35.44% | -6.13% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 15.99% | -11.21% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -63.10% | 18.58% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -38.48% | -19.31% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Shell (SHEL) at 1.38 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 0.55 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for FANG.
FANG
Energy industry group
0.55
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- FANG
- 0.55
- Min
- 0.24
SHEL
Energy industry group
1.38
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- SHEL
- 1.38
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 0.29 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while Shell (SHEL) at 0.38 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.
FANG
Energy industry group
0.29
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- FANG
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
SHEL
Energy industry group
0.38
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- SHEL
- 0.38
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | FANG | SHEL |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 0.55 | 1.38 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.29 | 0.38 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.99 | 0.59 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 2.47% and Shell (SHEL) at 1.54% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
FANG
Energy industry group
2.47%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- FANG
- 2.47%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
SHEL
Energy industry group
1.54%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- Median
- 1.71%
- SHEL
- 1.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Shell (SHEL) at 26.24% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 57.20% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
FANG
Energy industry group
57.20%
- Max
- 133.24%
- FANG
- 57.20%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
SHEL
Energy industry group
26.24%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- SHEL
- 26.24%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | FANG | SHEL |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 2.47% | 1.54% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 57.20% | 26.24% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Shell (SHEL) at 8.60 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 24.09 sits in the richer quartile — FANG needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.
FANG
Energy industry group
24.09
- Max
- 39.54
- FANG
- 24.09
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
SHEL
Energy industry group
8.60
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- SHEL
- 8.60
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Shell (SHEL) at 0.87 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 2.83 prices around its industry’s middle — SHEL costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.
FANG
Energy industry group
2.83
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- FANG
- 2.83
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
SHEL
Energy industry group
0.87
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- SHEL
- 0.87
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
On P/B ratio, both Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 1.28 and Shell (SHEL) at 1.43 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.
FANG
Energy industry group
1.28
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- FANG
- 1.28
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
SHEL
Energy industry group
1.43
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- SHEL
- 1.43
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | FANG | SHEL |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 24.09 | 8.60 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 2.83 | 0.87 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 1.28 | 1.43 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 12.09% | 10.35% |