FANG vs. VLO: Diamondback Energy vs. Valero Energy Stock Comparison
How do Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Valero Energy (VLO) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Valero Energy (VLO) both belong to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, though FANG is classified under Oil & Gas Exploration & Production while VLO falls under Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing.
| Profile Item | FANG | VLO |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Diamondback Energy Inc. | Valero Energy Corporation |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry Group | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing |
| Market Capitalization | 49.96 billion USD | 96.62 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | Nasdaq | NYSE |
| Listing Date | October 12, 2012 | January 4, 1982 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | FANG | VLO |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 26.99% | 107.71% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 8.52% | 47.89% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 14.17% | 39.74% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | FANG | VLO |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 33.77% | 39.31% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.53 | 0.60 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -42.10% | -41.22% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 2.38M | 3.05M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | FANG | VLO |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.67 | 2.63 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 0.97 | 4.08 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Valero Energy (VLO) at 46.87% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 4.86% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for VLO.
FANG
Energy industry group
4.86%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- FANG
- 4.86%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
VLO
Energy industry group
46.87%
- Max
- 53.85%
- VLO
- 46.87%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 11.62% and Valero Energy (VLO) at 8.83% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
FANG
Energy industry group
11.62%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- FANG
- 11.62%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
VLO
Energy industry group
8.83%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- Median
- 10.10%
- VLO
- 8.83%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 44.95% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Valero Energy (VLO) at 20.47%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
FANG
Energy industry group
44.95%
- Max
- 71.31%
- FANG
- 44.95%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
VLO
Energy industry group
20.47%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- VLO
- 20.47%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | FANG | VLO |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 4.86% | 46.87% |
| ROA (TTM) | 2.07% | 17.68% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 11.62% | 8.83% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 44.95% | 20.47% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 73.62% | 19.52% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 35.44% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Valero Energy (VLO) at -5.54% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for FANG.
EPS Growth
Valero Energy (VLO) at -11.77% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at -63.10% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | FANG | VLO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 35.44% | -5.54% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 15.99% | -11.40% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -63.10% | -11.77% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -38.48% | -36.12% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Valero Energy (VLO) at 1.72 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 0.55 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for FANG.
FANG
Energy industry group
0.55
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- FANG
- 0.55
- Min
- 0.24
VLO
Energy industry group
1.72
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- VLO
- 1.72
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 0.29 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while Valero Energy (VLO) at 0.35 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.
FANG
Energy industry group
0.29
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- FANG
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
VLO
Energy industry group
0.35
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- VLO
- 0.35
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | FANG | VLO |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 0.55 | 1.72 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.29 | 0.35 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.99 | 0.06 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 2.47% and Valero Energy (VLO) at 1.35% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
FANG
Energy industry group
2.47%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- FANG
- 2.47%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
VLO
Energy industry group
1.35%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- Median
- 1.71%
- VLO
- 1.35%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Valero Energy (VLO) at 10.76% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 57.20% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
FANG
Energy industry group
57.20%
- Max
- 133.24%
- FANG
- 57.20%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
VLO
Energy industry group
10.76%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- VLO
- 10.76%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | FANG | VLO |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 2.47% | 1.35% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 57.20% | 10.76% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Valero Energy (VLO) at 7.88 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 24.09 sits in the richer quartile — FANG needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.
FANG
Energy industry group
24.09
- Max
- 39.54
- FANG
- 24.09
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
VLO
Energy industry group
7.88
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- VLO
- 7.88
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Valero Energy (VLO) at 0.66 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 2.83 prices around its industry’s middle — VLO costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.
FANG
Energy industry group
2.83
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- FANG
- 2.83
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
VLO
Energy industry group
0.66
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- VLO
- 0.66
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 1.28 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Valero Energy (VLO) at 3.45 carries an above-peer premium to book — VLO is pricier on assets.
FANG
Energy industry group
1.28
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- FANG
- 1.28
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
VLO
Energy industry group
3.45
- Max
- 4.21
- VLO
- 3.45
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | FANG | VLO |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 24.09 | 7.88 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 2.83 | 0.66 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 1.28 | 3.45 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 12.09% | 13.02% |