ENB vs. PSX: Enbridge vs. Phillips 66 Stock Comparison
How do Enbridge (ENB) and Phillips 66 (PSX) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Enbridge (ENB) and Phillips 66 (PSX) both belong to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, though ENB is classified under Oil & Gas Storage & Transportation while PSX falls under Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing.
| Profile Item | ENB | PSX |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Enbridge Inc. | Phillips 66 |
| Country/Region | Canada | United States |
| GICS Sector | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry Group | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Oil & Gas Storage & Transportation | Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing |
| Market Capitalization | 104.51 billion USD | 95.85 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | March 15, 1984 | April 12, 2012 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | ENB | PSX |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 3.49% | 88.91% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 19.14% | 36.18% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 8.72% | 30.83% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | ENB | PSX |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 18.30% | 33.42% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.59 | 0.72 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -28.31% | -44.37% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 5.05M | 2.92M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | ENB | PSX |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.04 | 2.53 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.06 | 3.93 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Phillips 66 (PSX) at 39.84% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Enbridge (ENB) at 9.22% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for PSX.
ENB
Energy industry group
9.22%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- ENB
- 9.22%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
PSX
Energy industry group
39.84%
- Max
- 53.85%
- PSX
- 39.84%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both Enbridge (ENB) at 7.34% and Phillips 66 (PSX) at 7.48% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
ENB
Energy industry group
7.34%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- Median
- 10.10%
- ENB
- 7.34%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
PSX
Energy industry group
7.48%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- Median
- 10.10%
- PSX
- 7.48%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Enbridge (ENB) at 10.16% and Phillips 66 (PSX) at 13.17% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
ENB
Energy industry group
10.16%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- Median
- 18.73%
- ENB
- 10.16%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
PSX
Energy industry group
13.17%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- Median
- 18.73%
- PSX
- 13.17%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | ENB | PSX |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 9.22% | 39.84% |
| ROA (TTM) | 3.29% | 10.64% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 7.34% | 7.48% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 10.16% | 13.17% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 32.59% | 15.08% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Enbridge (ENB) at 21.92% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Phillips 66 (PSX) at -7.53% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in revenue momentum.
EPS Growth
Both Enbridge (ENB) at 37.61% and Phillips 66 (PSX) at 116.23% sit in the top peer quartile for EPS growth, so each is compounding per-share earnings faster than typical industry peers.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | ENB | PSX |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 21.92% | -7.53% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 6.94% | -8.00% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 37.61% | 116.23% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 36.00% | -22.60% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Phillips 66 (PSX) at 1.34 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Enbridge (ENB) at 0.72 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for ENB.
ENB
Energy industry group
0.72
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- ENB
- 0.72
- Min
- 0.24
PSX
Energy industry group
1.34
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- PSX
- 1.34
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Phillips 66 (PSX) at 0.52 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while Enbridge (ENB) at 1.63 uses more debt funding than most peers.
ENB
Energy industry group
1.63
- Max
- 1.75
- ENB
- 1.63
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
PSX
Energy industry group
0.52
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- PSX
- 0.52
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | ENB | PSX |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 0.72 | 1.34 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 1.63 | 0.52 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 6.33 | 0.82 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Enbridge (ENB) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Phillips 66 (PSX) reports a yield of 2.03%, ranking against industry peers normally.
ENB
Energy industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- Median
- 1.71%
- ENB
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
PSX
Energy industry group
2.03%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- PSX
- 2.03%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Enbridge (ENB) reports payout ratio above 100% at 147.68%, meaning dividends exceeded current-period earnings and sustainability needs extra context. Meanwhile Phillips 66 (PSX) reports 16.07%, ranking against industry peers normally.
ENB
Energy industry group
147.68%
- ENB
- 147.68%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
PSX
Energy industry group
16.07%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- PSX
- 16.07%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | ENB | PSX |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 2.03% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 147.68% | 16.07% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Phillips 66 (PSX) at 7.88 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Enbridge (ENB) at 22.65 sits in the richer quartile — ENB needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.
ENB
Energy industry group
22.65
- Max
- 39.54
- ENB
- 22.65
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
PSX
Energy industry group
7.88
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- PSX
- 7.88
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Phillips 66 (PSX) at 0.57 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Enbridge (ENB) at 1.25 prices around its industry’s middle — PSX costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.
ENB
Energy industry group
1.25
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- ENB
- 1.25
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
PSX
Energy industry group
0.57
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- PSX
- 0.57
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Both Enbridge (ENB) at 2.59 and Phillips 66 (PSX) at 2.79 carry a premium to book value versus peers, sitting in the upper P/B ratio quartile of their industries.
ENB
Energy industry group
2.59
- Max
- 4.21
- ENB
- 2.59
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
PSX
Energy industry group
2.79
- Max
- 4.21
- PSX
- 2.79
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ENB | PSX |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 22.65 | 7.88 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 1.25 | 0.57 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 2.59 | 2.79 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | -1.01% | 9.93% |