Seek Returns

DTM vs. PSX: DT Midstream vs. Phillips 66 Stock Comparison

How do DT Midstream (DTM) and Phillips 66 (PSX) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

DT Midstream (DTM) and Phillips 66 (PSX) both belong to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, though DTM is classified under Oil & Gas Storage & Transportation while PSX falls under Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing.

Company profile comparison for DT Midstream (DTM) and Phillips 66 (PSX)
Profile ItemDTMPSX
NameDT Midstream, Inc.Phillips 66
Country/RegionUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorEnergyEnergy
GICS Industry GroupEnergyEnergy
GICS IndustryOil, Gas & Consumable FuelsOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
GICS Sub-IndustryOil & Gas Storage & TransportationOil & Gas Refining & Marketing
Market Capitalization11.60 billion USD95.85 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJuly 1, 2021April 12, 2012
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

DTM
PSX
GSPC
Loading price history…
DT Midstream (DTM) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for DT Midstream (DTM) and Phillips 66 (PSX). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for DT Midstream (DTM) and Phillips 66 (PSX). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for DT Midstream (DTM) and Phillips 66 (PSX)
MetricDTMPSX
Total Return (1Y)4.08%88.91%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)32.58%36.18%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)23.68%30.83%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

DTM
PSX
GSPC
Loading price history…
DT Midstream (DTM) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for DT Midstream (DTM) and Phillips 66 (PSX). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for DT Midstream (DTM) and Phillips 66 (PSX)
MetricDTMPSX
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)23.13%33.42%
Beta (5Y)0.750.72
Max Drawdown (5Y)-24.59%-44.37%
Avg. Volume (3M)983.33K2.92M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
DTM and PSX are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for DT Midstream (DTM) and Phillips 66 (PSX)
MetricDTMPSX
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)-0.012.53
Sortino Ratio (1Y)-0.013.93

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Phillips 66 (PSX) at 39.84% sits in the top ROE quartile, while DT Midstream (DTM) at 9.92% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for PSX.

DTM

Energy industry group

9.92%

Max
53.85%
Q3
24.79%
Median
12.85%
DTM
9.92%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%

PSX

Energy industry group

39.84%

Max
53.85%
PSX
39.84%
Q3
24.79%
Median
12.85%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%
Loading chart…
DT Midstream (DTM) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their ROE against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

DT Midstream (DTM) at 35.36% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Phillips 66 (PSX) at 7.48%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

DTM

Energy industry group

35.36%

Max
56.92%
DTM
35.36%
Q3
22.92%
Median
10.10%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%

PSX

Energy industry group

7.48%

Max
56.92%
Q3
22.92%
Median
10.10%
PSX
7.48%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%
Loading chart…
DT Midstream (DTM) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their net margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

DT Midstream (DTM) at 49.11% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Phillips 66 (PSX) at 13.17%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

DTM

Energy industry group

49.11%

Max
71.31%
DTM
49.11%
Q3
33.75%
Median
18.73%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%

PSX

Energy industry group

13.17%

Max
71.31%
Q3
33.75%
Median
18.73%
PSX
13.17%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%
Loading chart…
DT Midstream (DTM) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their operating margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for DT Midstream (DTM) and Phillips 66 (PSX)
MetricDTMPSX
ROE (TTM)9.92%39.84%
ROA (TTM)4.05%10.64%
Net Margin (TTM)35.36%7.48%
Operating Margin (TTM)49.11%13.17%
Gross Margin (TTM)75.38%15.08%

Growth

Revenue Growth

DT Midstream (DTM) at 26.71% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Phillips 66 (PSX) at -7.53% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in revenue momentum.

Loading chart…
DT Midstream (DTM) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Phillips 66 (PSX) at 116.23% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while DT Midstream (DTM) at 19.44% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for PSX.

Loading chart…
DT Midstream (DTM) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for DT Midstream (DTM) and Phillips 66 (PSX)
MetricDTMPSX
Revenue Growth (YoY)26.71%-7.53%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)10.55%-8.00%
EPS Growth (YoY)19.44%116.23%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)4.12%-22.60%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Both DT Midstream (DTM) at 1.16 and Phillips 66 (PSX) at 1.34 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.

DTM

Energy industry group

1.16

Max
3.64
Q3
2.21
Median
1.41
DTM
1.16
Q1
0.88
Min
0.24

PSX

Energy industry group

1.34

Max
3.64
Q3
2.21
Median
1.41
PSX
1.34
Q1
0.88
Min
0.24
Loading chart…
DT Midstream (DTM) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their current ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Both DT Midstream (DTM) at 0.67 and Phillips 66 (PSX) at 0.52 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.

DTM

Energy industry group

0.67

Max
1.75
Q3
0.93
DTM
0.67
Median
0.54
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

PSX

Energy industry group

0.52

Max
1.75
Q3
0.93
Median
0.54
PSX
0.52
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
DT Midstream (DTM) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for DT Midstream (DTM) and Phillips 66 (PSX)
MetricDTMPSX
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.161.34
Debt / Equity (MRQ)0.670.52
Net Debt / EBITDA3.300.82

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both DT Midstream (DTM) at 3.07% and Phillips 66 (PSX) at 2.03% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

DTM

Energy industry group

3.07%

Max
8.57%
Q3
3.58%
DTM
3.07%
Median
1.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PSX

Energy industry group

2.03%

Max
8.57%
Q3
3.58%
PSX
2.03%
Median
1.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
DT Midstream (DTM) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Phillips 66 (PSX) at 16.07% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while DT Midstream (DTM) at 75.38% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.

DTM

Energy industry group

75.38%

Max
133.24%
DTM
75.38%
Q3
53.31%
Median
25.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PSX

Energy industry group

16.07%

Max
133.24%
Q3
53.31%
Median
25.24%
PSX
16.07%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
DT Midstream (DTM) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for DT Midstream (DTM) and Phillips 66 (PSX)
MetricDTMPSX
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.07%2.03%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)75.38%16.07%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Phillips 66 (PSX) at 7.88 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while DT Midstream (DTM) at 24.76 sits in the richer quartile — DTM needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.

DTM

Energy industry group

24.76

Max
39.54
DTM
24.76
Q3
21.72
Median
12.19
Q1
7.71
Min
2.99

PSX

Energy industry group

7.88

Max
39.54
Q3
21.72
Median
12.19
PSX
7.88
Q1
7.71
Min
2.99
Loading chart…
DT Midstream (DTM) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Phillips 66 (PSX) at 0.57 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while DT Midstream (DTM) at 8.70 prices above its industry range — a wide gap in sales valuation between them.

DTM

Energy industry group

8.70

DTM
8.70
Max
5.40
Q3
2.85
Median
1.69
Q1
0.88
Min
0.00

PSX

Energy industry group

0.57

Max
5.40
Q3
2.85
Median
1.69
Q1
0.88
PSX
0.57
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
DT Midstream (DTM) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Both DT Midstream (DTM) at 2.41 and Phillips 66 (PSX) at 2.79 carry a premium to book value versus peers, sitting in the upper P/B ratio quartile of their industries.

DTM

Energy industry group

2.41

Max
4.21
DTM
2.41
Q3
2.38
Median
1.51
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01

PSX

Energy industry group

2.79

Max
4.21
PSX
2.79
Q3
2.38
Median
1.51
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01
Loading chart…
DT Midstream (DTM) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for DT Midstream (DTM) and Phillips 66 (PSX)
MetricDTMPSX
P/E Ratio (TTM)24.767.88
P/S Ratio (TTM)8.700.57
P/B Ratio (MRQ)2.412.79
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)2.27%9.93%