Seek Returns

DINO vs. PSX: HF Sinclair vs. Phillips 66 Stock Comparison

How do HF Sinclair (DINO) and Phillips 66 (PSX) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

HF Sinclair (DINO) and Phillips 66 (PSX) are both classified in the Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing sub-industry within the broader Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

Company profile comparison for HF Sinclair (DINO) and Phillips 66 (PSX)
Profile ItemDINOPSX
NameHF Sinclair CorporationPhillips 66
Country/RegionUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorEnergyEnergy
GICS Industry GroupEnergyEnergy
GICS IndustryOil, Gas & Consumable FuelsOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
GICS Sub-IndustryOil & Gas Refining & MarketingOil & Gas Refining & Marketing
Market Capitalization16.45 billion USD95.85 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980April 12, 2012
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

DINO
PSX
GSPC
Loading price history…
HF Sinclair (DINO) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for HF Sinclair (DINO) and Phillips 66 (PSX). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for HF Sinclair (DINO) and Phillips 66 (PSX). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for HF Sinclair (DINO) and Phillips 66 (PSX)
MetricDINOPSX
Total Return (1Y)90.18%88.91%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)29.39%36.18%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)28.64%30.83%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

DINO
PSX
GSPC
Loading price history…
HF Sinclair (DINO) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for HF Sinclair (DINO) and Phillips 66 (PSX). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for HF Sinclair (DINO) and Phillips 66 (PSX)
MetricDINOPSX
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)41.52%33.42%
Beta (5Y)0.760.72
Max Drawdown (5Y)-57.35%-44.37%
Avg. Volume (3M)2.52M2.92M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
DINO and PSX are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for HF Sinclair (DINO) and Phillips 66 (PSX)
MetricDINOPSX
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)2.072.53
Sortino Ratio (1Y)3.063.93

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Both HF Sinclair (DINO) at 33.21% and Phillips 66 (PSX) at 39.84% sit in the top peer quartile for ROE, suggesting each generates more profit from shareholders’ equity than typical industry peers.

DINO

Energy industry group

33.21%

Max
53.85%
DINO
33.21%
Q3
24.79%
Median
12.85%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%

PSX

Energy industry group

39.84%

Max
53.85%
PSX
39.84%
Q3
24.79%
Median
12.85%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%
Loading chart…
HF Sinclair (DINO) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their ROE against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Both HF Sinclair (DINO) at 10.13% and Phillips 66 (PSX) at 7.48% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

DINO

Energy industry group

10.13%

Max
56.92%
Q3
22.92%
DINO
10.13%
Median
10.10%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%

PSX

Energy industry group

7.48%

Max
56.92%
Q3
22.92%
Median
10.10%
PSX
7.48%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%
Loading chart…
HF Sinclair (DINO) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their net margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both HF Sinclair (DINO) at 25.13% and Phillips 66 (PSX) at 13.17% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

DINO

Energy industry group

25.13%

Max
71.31%
Q3
33.75%
DINO
25.13%
Median
18.73%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%

PSX

Energy industry group

13.17%

Max
71.31%
Q3
33.75%
Median
18.73%
PSX
13.17%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%
Loading chart…
HF Sinclair (DINO) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their operating margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for HF Sinclair (DINO) and Phillips 66 (PSX)
MetricDINOPSX
ROE (TTM)33.21%39.84%
ROA (TTM)15.77%10.64%
Net Margin (TTM)10.13%7.48%
Operating Margin (TTM)25.13%13.17%
Gross Margin (TTM)18.01%15.08%

Growth

Revenue Growth

HF Sinclair (DINO) at -5.99% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Phillips 66 (PSX) at -7.53% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Loading chart…
HF Sinclair (DINO) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Both companies show strong earnings momentum, but HF Sinclair (DINO) at 238.46% is the standout with EPS growth above its industry range; Phillips 66 (PSX) at 116.23% also sits in the top quartile.

Loading chart…
HF Sinclair (DINO) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for HF Sinclair (DINO) and Phillips 66 (PSX)
MetricDINOPSX
Revenue Growth (YoY)-5.99%-7.53%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)-11.07%-8.00%
EPS Growth (YoY)238.46%116.23%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)-40.03%-22.60%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Phillips 66 (PSX) at 1.34 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while HF Sinclair (DINO) at 2.27 sits above its industry’s typical mid-range — comfortable liquidity, though possibly with more idle current assets relative to peers.

DINO

Energy industry group

2.27

Max
3.64
DINO
2.27
Q3
2.21
Median
1.41
Q1
0.88
Min
0.24

PSX

Energy industry group

1.34

Max
3.64
Q3
2.21
Median
1.41
PSX
1.34
Q1
0.88
Min
0.24
Loading chart…
HF Sinclair (DINO) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their current ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

HF Sinclair (DINO) at 0.29 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while Phillips 66 (PSX) at 0.52 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.

DINO

Energy industry group

0.29

Max
1.75
Q3
0.93
Median
0.54
Q1
0.30
DINO
0.29
Min
0.00

PSX

Energy industry group

0.52

Max
1.75
Q3
0.93
Median
0.54
PSX
0.52
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
HF Sinclair (DINO) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for HF Sinclair (DINO) and Phillips 66 (PSX)
MetricDINOPSX
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.271.34
Debt / Equity (MRQ)0.290.52
Net Debt / EBITDA0.010.82

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both HF Sinclair (DINO) at 2.07% and Phillips 66 (PSX) at 2.03% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

DINO

Energy industry group

2.07%

Max
8.57%
Q3
3.58%
DINO
2.07%
Median
1.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PSX

Energy industry group

2.03%

Max
8.57%
Q3
3.58%
PSX
2.03%
Median
1.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
HF Sinclair (DINO) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Both HF Sinclair (DINO) at 10.32% and Phillips 66 (PSX) at 16.07% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

DINO

Energy industry group

10.32%

Max
133.24%
Q3
53.31%
Median
25.24%
DINO
10.32%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PSX

Energy industry group

16.07%

Max
133.24%
Q3
53.31%
Median
25.24%
PSX
16.07%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
HF Sinclair (DINO) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for HF Sinclair (DINO) and Phillips 66 (PSX)
MetricDINOPSX
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.07%2.03%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)10.32%16.07%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

HF Sinclair (DINO) at 4.95 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Phillips 66 (PSX) at 7.88 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for DINO, though growth and earnings durability still matter.

DINO

Energy industry group

4.95

Max
39.54
Q3
21.72
Median
12.19
Q1
7.71
DINO
4.95
Min
2.99

PSX

Energy industry group

7.88

Max
39.54
Q3
21.72
Median
12.19
PSX
7.88
Q1
7.71
Min
2.99
Loading chart…
HF Sinclair (DINO) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Both HF Sinclair (DINO) at 0.47 and Phillips 66 (PSX) at 0.57 fetch a relatively low price per dollar of sales, landing in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile of their industries.

DINO

Energy industry group

0.47

Max
5.40
Q3
2.85
Median
1.69
Q1
0.88
DINO
0.47
Min
0.00

PSX

Energy industry group

0.57

Max
5.40
Q3
2.85
Median
1.69
Q1
0.88
PSX
0.57
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
HF Sinclair (DINO) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

HF Sinclair (DINO) at 1.43 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Phillips 66 (PSX) at 2.79 carries an above-peer premium to book — PSX is pricier on assets.

DINO

Energy industry group

1.43

Max
4.21
Q3
2.38
Median
1.51
DINO
1.43
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01

PSX

Energy industry group

2.79

Max
4.21
PSX
2.79
Q3
2.38
Median
1.51
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01
Loading chart…
HF Sinclair (DINO) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for HF Sinclair (DINO) and Phillips 66 (PSX)
MetricDINOPSX
P/E Ratio (TTM)4.957.88
P/S Ratio (TTM)0.470.57
P/B Ratio (MRQ)1.432.79
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)18.17%9.93%