Seek Returns logo

DHI vs. LULU: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at DHI and LULU, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolDHILULU
Company NameD.R. Horton, Inc.lululemon athletica inc.
CountryUnited StatesCanada
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryHousehold DurablesTextiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods
Market Capitalization49.35 billion USD24.03 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateJune 5, 1992July 27, 2007
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of DHI and LULU by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

DHI vs. LULU: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolDHILULU
5-Day Price Return7.58%4.89%
13-Week Price Return31.24%-34.09%
26-Week Price Return21.58%-51.32%
52-Week Price Return-3.79%-16.36%
Month-to-Date Return15.90%-0.02%
Year-to-Date Return18.40%-47.57%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.79M3.40M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.91M3.04M
3-Month Volatility47.85%53.70%
Beta1.421.10

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

DHI

16.07%

Household Durables Industry

Max
26.99%
Q3
17.28%
Median
12.66%
Q1
7.34%
Min
0.07%

DHI’s Return on Equity of 16.07% is on par with the norm for the Household Durables industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

LULU

43.48%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
53.33%
Q3
26.13%
Median
18.47%
Q1
7.99%
Min
-10.49%

In the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, LULU’s Return on Equity of 43.48% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

DHI vs. LULU: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

DHI

11.46%

Household Durables Industry

Max
15.50%
Q3
8.99%
Median
6.57%
Q1
4.33%
Min
-0.49%

A Net Profit Margin of 11.46% places DHI in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

LULU

16.82%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
23.35%
Q3
13.49%
Median
8.45%
Q1
4.18%
Min
-3.90%

A Net Profit Margin of 16.82% places LULU in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

DHI vs. LULU: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

DHI

15.17%

Household Durables Industry

Max
20.22%
Q3
12.29%
Median
9.54%
Q1
6.30%
Min
-1.92%

An Operating Profit Margin of 15.17% places DHI in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

LULU

23.36%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
29.47%
Q3
20.87%
Median
13.00%
Q1
7.02%
Min
-3.59%

An Operating Profit Margin of 23.36% places LULU in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

DHI vs. LULU: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolDHILULU
Return on Equity (TTM)16.07%43.48%
Return on Assets (TTM)11.07%25.05%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)11.46%16.82%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)15.17%23.36%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)25.08%59.34%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

DHI

4.91

Household Durables Industry

Max
9.23
Q3
4.50
Median
2.35
Q1
1.29
Min
0.70

DHI’s Current Ratio of 4.91 is in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

LULU

2.28

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
3.91
Q3
2.49
Median
1.89
Q1
1.43
Min
0.80

LULU’s Current Ratio of 2.28 aligns with the median group of the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

DHI vs. LULU: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

DHI

0.30

Household Durables Industry

Max
1.84
Q3
0.90
Median
0.34
Q1
0.19
Min
0.00

DHI’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.30 is typical for the Household Durables industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

LULU

0.00

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
2.67
Q3
1.29
Median
0.59
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, LULU’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

DHI vs. LULU: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

DHI

140.40

Household Durables Industry

Max
140.40
Q3
77.14
Median
24.53
Q1
5.69
Min
-17.01

DHI’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 140.40 is in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

LULU

-47.83

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
57.00
Q3
35.85
Median
9.20
Q1
4.29
Min
-32.49

LULU has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -47.83. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

DHI vs. LULU: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolDHILULU
Current Ratio (MRQ)4.912.28
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.480.98
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.300.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)140.40-47.83

Growth

Revenue Growth

DHI vs. LULU: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

DHI vs. LULU: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

DHI

0.95%

Household Durables Industry

Max
8.95%
Q3
4.19%
Median
1.88%
Q1
0.03%
Min
0.00%

DHI’s Dividend Yield of 0.95% is consistent with its peers in the Household Durables industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

LULU

0.00%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
6.59%
Q3
3.60%
Median
2.59%
Q1
0.95%
Min
0.00%

LULU currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

DHI vs. LULU: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

DHI

11.96%

Household Durables Industry

Max
125.12%
Q3
62.43%
Median
39.18%
Q1
5.55%
Min
0.00%

DHI’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 11.96% is within the typical range for the Household Durables industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

LULU

0.00%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
195.44%
Q3
106.47%
Median
58.77%
Q1
36.52%
Min
0.00%

LULU has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

DHI vs. LULU: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolDHILULU
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.95%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)11.96%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

DHI

12.55

Household Durables Industry

Max
29.75
Q3
18.88
Median
13.25
Q1
9.26
Min
6.32

DHI’s P/E Ratio of 12.55 is within the middle range for the Household Durables industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

LULU

13.38

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
63.29
Q3
34.64
Median
18.01
Q1
13.88
Min
6.04

In the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, LULU’s P/E Ratio of 13.38 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

DHI vs. LULU: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

DHI

1.44

Household Durables Industry

Max
2.12
Q3
1.21
Median
0.83
Q1
0.51
Min
0.18

DHI’s P/S Ratio of 1.44 is in the upper echelon for the Household Durables industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

LULU

2.25

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
5.46
Q3
3.13
Median
1.72
Q1
0.83
Min
0.26

LULU’s P/S Ratio of 2.25 aligns with the market consensus for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

DHI vs. LULU: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

DHI

1.65

Household Durables Industry

Max
4.21
Q3
2.29
Median
1.34
Q1
0.98
Min
0.59

DHI’s P/B Ratio of 1.65 is within the conventional range for the Household Durables industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

LULU

7.80

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
9.76
Q3
6.00
Median
3.26
Q1
1.97
Min
0.69

LULU’s P/B Ratio of 7.80 is in the upper tier for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

DHI vs. LULU: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolDHILULU
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)12.5513.38
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.442.25
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.657.80
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)15.2815.24