CX vs. SHW: CEMEX vs. Sherwin-Williams Stock Comparison
How do CEMEX (CX) and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
CEMEX (CX) and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) both fall under the Materials industry group, but CX is classified in Construction Materials while SHW is classified in Chemicals.
Sherwin-Williams (SHW) trades as ordinary local shares, while CEMEX (CX) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.
| Profile Item | CX | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Cemex S.A.B. de C.V. Sponsored ADR | The Sherwin-Williams Company |
| Country/Region | Mexico | United States |
| GICS Sector | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry Group | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry | Construction Materials | Chemicals |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Construction Materials | Specialty Chemicals |
| Market Capitalization | 15.47 billion USD | 83.13 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | September 15, 1999 | March 17, 1980 |
| Security Type | ADR | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | CX | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 7.57% | 5.74% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 17.84% | 13.18% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 10.81% | 2.84% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | CX | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 36.82% | 29.59% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.57 | 1.02 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -53.08% | -42.46% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 7.01M | 1.72M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | CX | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.09 | 0.05 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 0.14 | 0.08 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 63.70% clears its industry range for ROE, a sharper capital-efficiency signal than CEMEX (CX) at 5.17%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.
CX
Materials industry group
5.17%
- Max
- 52.88%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- CX
- 5.17%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
SHW
Materials industry group
63.70%
- SHW
- 63.70%
- Max
- 52.88%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both CEMEX (CX) at 3.60% and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 10.74% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
CX
Materials industry group
3.60%
- Max
- 38.66%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- Median
- 5.28%
- CX
- 3.60%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
SHW
Materials industry group
10.74%
- Max
- 38.66%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- SHW
- 10.74%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both CEMEX (CX) at 14.77% and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 17.56% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
CX
Materials industry group
14.77%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- CX
- 14.77%
- Median
- 12.56%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
SHW
Materials industry group
17.56%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- SHW
- 17.56%
- Median
- 12.56%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | CX | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 5.17% | 63.70% |
| ROA (TTM) | 5.07% | 9.48% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 3.60% | 10.74% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 14.77% | 17.56% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 33.48% | 48.60% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both CEMEX (CX) at 0.43% and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 2.06% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Both CEMEX (CX) at 2.35% and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at -2.75% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | CX | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 0.43% | 2.06% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 3.13% | 2.10% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 2.35% | -2.75% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 4.14% | 9.95% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both CEMEX (CX) at 0.95 and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 0.71 run current ratio in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.
CX
Materials industry group
0.95
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- CX
- 0.95
- Min
- 0.16
SHW
Materials industry group
0.71
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- SHW
- 0.71
- Min
- 0.16
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
CEMEX (CX) at 0.46 is near its industry mid-range for debt-to-equity ratio, while Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 3.72 sits above its benchmark range, pointing to a heavier debt load relative to equity.
CX
Materials industry group
0.46
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.47
- CX
- 0.46
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
SHW
Materials industry group
3.72
- SHW
- 3.72
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.47
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | CX | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 0.95 | 0.71 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.46 | 3.72 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.60 | 3.04 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
CEMEX (CX) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Sherwin-Williams (SHW) reports a yield of 0.91%, ranking against industry peers normally.
CX
Materials industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- Median
- 0.38%
- CX
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
SHW
Materials industry group
0.91%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- SHW
- 0.91%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 29.35% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while CEMEX (CX) at 67.86% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
CX
Materials industry group
67.86%
- Max
- 83.62%
- CX
- 67.86%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
SHW
Materials industry group
29.35%
- Max
- 83.62%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- SHW
- 29.35%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | CX | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.91% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 67.86% | 29.35% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 31.66 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while CEMEX (CX) at 67.00 sits above its peer range — an unusually expensive price for CX’s trailing earnings.
CX
Materials industry group
67.00
- CX
- 67.00
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
SHW
Materials industry group
31.66
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- SHW
- 31.66
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
P/S Ratio (TTM)
On P/S ratio, both CEMEX (CX) at 0.89 and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 3.34 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.
CX
Materials industry group
0.89
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- Median
- 1.87
- CX
- 0.89
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
SHW
Materials industry group
3.34
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- SHW
- 3.34
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
CEMEX (CX) at 1.20 sits in the lower P/B ratio quartile relative to book while Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 20.78 prices above its industry range — a wide valuation gap against assets.
CX
Materials industry group
1.20
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.26
- CX
- 1.20
- Min
- -0.17
SHW
Materials industry group
20.78
- SHW
- 20.78
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CX | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 67.00 | 31.66 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 0.89 | 3.34 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 1.20 | 20.78 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 8.86% | 2.98% |