CW vs. PWR: Curtiss-Wright vs. Quanta Services Stock Comparison
How do Curtiss-Wright (CW) and Quanta Services (PWR) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Curtiss-Wright (CW) and Quanta Services (PWR) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but CW is classified in Aerospace & Defense while PWR is classified in Construction & Engineering.
| Profile Item | CW | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Curtiss-Wright Corporation | Quanta Services, Inc. |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| GICS Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Construction & Engineering |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Construction & Engineering |
| Market Capitalization | 16.81 billion USD | 81.50 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | March 17, 1980 | February 12, 1998 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | CW | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | -15.83% | 32.97% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 33.49% | 51.81% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 29.54% | 38.19% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | CW | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 38.26% | 50.22% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.93 | 1.29 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -45.25% | -35.15% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 427.49K | 1.19M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | CW | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.53 | 0.57 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.71 | 0.87 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 21.82% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Quanta Services (PWR) at 18.02% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for CW.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
21.82%
- Max
- 40.55%
- CW
- 21.82%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
PWR
Capital Goods industry group
18.02%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- PWR
- 18.02%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
Net Margin (TTM)
Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 14.86% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Quanta Services (PWR) at 4.51%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
14.86%
- Max
- 27.47%
- CW
- 14.86%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
PWR
Capital Goods industry group
4.51%
- Max
- 27.47%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- PWR
- 4.51%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 19.87% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Quanta Services (PWR) at 8.63%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
19.87%
- Max
- 36.60%
- CW
- 19.87%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
PWR
Capital Goods industry group
8.63%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- PWR
- 8.63%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | CW | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 21.82% | 18.02% |
| ROA (TTM) | 8.90% | 5.72% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 14.86% | 4.51% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 19.87% | 8.63% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 38.07% | 15.76% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Quanta Services (PWR) at 20.31% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 12.08% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for PWR.
EPS Growth
Both Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 21.99% and Quanta Services (PWR) at 12.77% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | CW | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 12.08% | 20.31% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 11.01% | 18.60% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 21.99% | 12.77% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 19.09% | 27.00% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 1.42 and Quanta Services (PWR) at 1.16 run current ratio in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
1.42
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- CW
- 1.42
- Min
- 0.36
PWR
Capital Goods industry group
1.16
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- PWR
- 1.16
- Min
- 0.36
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 0.45 and Quanta Services (PWR) at 0.71 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
0.45
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- CW
- 0.45
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
PWR
Capital Goods industry group
0.71
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- PWR
- 0.71
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | CW | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.42 | 1.16 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.45 | 0.71 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.00 | 1.43 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 0.23% and Quanta Services (PWR) at 0.09% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
0.23%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- CW
- 0.23%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
PWR
Capital Goods industry group
0.09%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- PWR
- 0.09%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 6.67% and Quanta Services (PWR) at 3.98% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
6.67%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- CW
- 6.67%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
PWR
Capital Goods industry group
3.98%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- PWR
- 3.98%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | CW | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.23% | 0.09% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 6.67% | 3.98% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 30.92 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Quanta Services (PWR) at 48.95 sits in the richer quartile — PWR needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
30.92
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- CW
- 30.92
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
PWR
Capital Goods industry group
48.95
- Max
- 59.38
- PWR
- 48.95
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Quanta Services (PWR) at 2.19 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 4.50 sits in the pricier quartile — CW costs more per dollar of sales.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
4.50
- Max
- 7.54
- CW
- 4.50
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
PWR
Capital Goods industry group
2.19
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- PWR
- 2.19
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Both Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 6.64 and Quanta Services (PWR) at 7.73 carry a premium to book value versus peers, sitting in the upper P/B ratio quartile of their industries.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
6.64
- Max
- 9.66
- CW
- 6.64
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
PWR
Capital Goods industry group
7.73
- Max
- 9.66
- PWR
- 7.73
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CW | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 30.92 | 48.95 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 4.50 | 2.19 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 6.64 | 7.73 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 2.86% | 3.78% |