CAT vs. CW: Caterpillar vs. Curtiss-Wright Stock Comparison
How do Caterpillar (CAT) and Curtiss-Wright (CW) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Caterpillar (CAT) and Curtiss-Wright (CW) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but CAT is classified in Machinery while CW is classified in Aerospace & Defense.
| Profile Item | CAT | CW |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Caterpillar Inc. | Curtiss-Wright Corporation |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| GICS Industry | Machinery | Aerospace & Defense |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Construction Machinery & Heavy Transportation Equipment | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Capitalization | 255.63 billion USD | 16.81 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | January 2, 1962 | March 17, 1980 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | CAT | CW |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 6.75% | -15.83% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 38.34% | 33.49% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 25.28% | 29.54% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | CAT | CW |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 41.33% | 38.26% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.65 | 0.93 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -47.79% | -45.25% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 2.82M | 427.49K |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | CAT | CW |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.06 | -0.53 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 0.08 | -0.71 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both companies show strong equity returns, but Caterpillar (CAT) at 56.14% is the standout with ROE above its industry range; Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 21.82% also sits in the top quartile.
CAT
Capital Goods industry group
56.14%
- CAT
- 56.14%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
CW
Capital Goods industry group
21.82%
- Max
- 40.55%
- CW
- 21.82%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
Net Margin (TTM)
For every dollar of sales, both Caterpillar (CAT) at 15.21% and Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 14.86% retain more as net profit than most peers, landing in the top net margin quartile of their industries.
CAT
Capital Goods industry group
15.21%
- Max
- 27.47%
- CAT
- 15.21%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
CW
Capital Goods industry group
14.86%
- Max
- 27.47%
- CW
- 14.86%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Caterpillar (CAT) at 20.19% and Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 19.87% convert sales into operating profit at a top-quartile rate, pointing to tighter cost discipline before financing and tax.
CAT
Capital Goods industry group
20.19%
- Max
- 36.60%
- CAT
- 20.19%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
CW
Capital Goods industry group
19.87%
- Max
- 36.60%
- CW
- 19.87%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | CAT | CW |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 56.14% | 21.82% |
| ROA (TTM) | 9.09% | 8.90% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 15.21% | 14.86% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 20.19% | 19.87% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 29.54% | 38.07% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Caterpillar (CAT) at 4.29% and Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 12.08% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Both Caterpillar (CAT) at -14.69% and Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 21.99% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | CAT | CW |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 4.29% | 12.08% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 4.38% | 11.01% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -14.69% | 21.99% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 14.17% | 19.09% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Caterpillar (CAT) at 1.42 and Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 1.42 run current ratio in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.
CAT
Capital Goods industry group
1.42
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- CAT
- 1.42
- Min
- 0.36
CW
Capital Goods industry group
1.42
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- CW
- 1.42
- Min
- 0.36
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 0.45 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while Caterpillar (CAT) at 2.10 uses more debt funding than most peers.
CAT
Capital Goods industry group
2.10
- Max
- 2.33
- CAT
- 2.10
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
CW
Capital Goods industry group
0.45
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- CW
- 0.45
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | CAT | CW |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.42 | 1.42 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 2.10 | 0.45 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.25 | 1.00 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Caterpillar (CAT) at 1.13% and Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 0.23% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
CAT
Capital Goods industry group
1.13%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- CAT
- 1.13%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
CW
Capital Goods industry group
0.23%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- CW
- 0.23%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Caterpillar (CAT) at 24.18% and Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 6.67% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
CAT
Capital Goods industry group
24.18%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- CAT
- 24.18%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
CW
Capital Goods industry group
6.67%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- CW
- 6.67%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | CAT | CW |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.13% | 0.23% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 24.18% | 6.67% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Caterpillar (CAT) at 21.92 and Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 30.92 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
CAT
Capital Goods industry group
21.92
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- CAT
- 21.92
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
CW
Capital Goods industry group
30.92
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- CW
- 30.92
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Caterpillar (CAT) at 3.29 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 4.50 sits in the pricier quartile — CW costs more per dollar of sales.
CAT
Capital Goods industry group
3.29
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- CAT
- 3.29
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
CW
Capital Goods industry group
4.50
- Max
- 7.54
- CW
- 4.50
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Both look rich against book: Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 6.64 sits in the upper P/B ratio quartile, and Caterpillar (CAT) at 11.90 prices even higher, above its industry range.
CAT
Capital Goods industry group
11.90
- CAT
- 11.90
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
CW
Capital Goods industry group
6.64
- Max
- 9.66
- CW
- 6.64
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CAT | CW |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 21.92 | 30.92 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 3.29 | 4.50 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 11.90 | 6.64 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 1.55% | 2.86% |