CW vs. PH: Curtiss-Wright vs. Parker-Hannifin Stock Comparison
How do Curtiss-Wright (CW) and Parker-Hannifin (PH) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Curtiss-Wright (CW) and Parker-Hannifin (PH) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but CW is classified in Aerospace & Defense while PH is classified in Machinery.
| Profile Item | CW | PH |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Curtiss-Wright Corporation | Parker-Hannifin Corporation |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| GICS Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Machinery |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components |
| Market Capitalization | 16.81 billion USD | 115.73 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | March 17, 1980 | March 17, 1980 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | CW | PH |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | -15.83% | 14.13% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 33.49% | 33.71% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 29.54% | 25.35% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | CW | PH |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 38.26% | 27.33% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.93 | 1.12 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -45.25% | -28.64% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 427.49K | 627.57K |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | CW | PH |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.53 | 0.36 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.71 | 0.53 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 21.82% and Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 24.95% sit in the top peer quartile for ROE, suggesting each generates more profit from shareholders’ equity than typical industry peers.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
21.82%
- Max
- 40.55%
- CW
- 21.82%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
PH
Capital Goods industry group
24.95%
- Max
- 40.55%
- PH
- 24.95%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
Net Margin (TTM)
For every dollar of sales, both Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 14.86% and Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 16.62% retain more as net profit than most peers, landing in the top net margin quartile of their industries.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
14.86%
- Max
- 27.47%
- CW
- 14.86%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
PH
Capital Goods industry group
16.62%
- Max
- 27.47%
- PH
- 16.62%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 19.87% and Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 21.90% convert sales into operating profit at a top-quartile rate, pointing to tighter cost discipline before financing and tax.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
19.87%
- Max
- 36.60%
- CW
- 19.87%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
PH
Capital Goods industry group
21.90%
- Max
- 36.60%
- PH
- 21.90%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | CW | PH |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 21.82% | 24.95% |
| ROA (TTM) | 8.90% | 8.56% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 14.86% | 16.62% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 19.87% | 21.90% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 38.07% | 37.70% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 12.08% and Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 8.31% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Both Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 21.99% and Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 5.01% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | CW | PH |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 12.08% | 8.31% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 11.01% | 4.09% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 21.99% | 5.01% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 19.09% | 21.09% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 1.42 and Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 0.94 run current ratio in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
1.42
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- CW
- 1.42
- Min
- 0.36
PH
Capital Goods industry group
0.94
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- PH
- 0.94
- Min
- 0.36
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 0.45 and Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 1.09 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
0.45
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- CW
- 0.45
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
PH
Capital Goods industry group
1.09
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- PH
- 1.09
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | CW | PH |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.42 | 0.94 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.45 | 1.09 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.00 | 2.81 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 0.23% and Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 0.85% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
0.23%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- CW
- 0.23%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
PH
Capital Goods industry group
0.85%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- PH
- 0.85%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 6.67% and Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 26.11% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
6.67%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- CW
- 6.67%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
PH
Capital Goods industry group
26.11%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- PH
- 26.11%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | CW | PH |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.23% | 0.85% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 6.67% | 26.11% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 30.92 and Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 31.53 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
30.92
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- CW
- 30.92
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
PH
Capital Goods industry group
31.53
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- PH
- 31.53
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Both Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 4.50 and Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 5.16 command a richer price per dollar of sales than most peers, sitting in the upper P/S ratio quartile of their industries.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
4.50
- Max
- 7.54
- CW
- 4.50
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
PH
Capital Goods industry group
5.16
- Max
- 7.54
- PH
- 5.16
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Both Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 6.64 and Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 7.25 carry a premium to book value versus peers, sitting in the upper P/B ratio quartile of their industries.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
6.64
- Max
- 9.66
- CW
- 6.64
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
PH
Capital Goods industry group
7.25
- Max
- 9.66
- PH
- 7.25
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CW | PH |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 30.92 | 31.53 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 4.50 | 5.16 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 6.64 | 7.25 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 2.86% | 2.45% |