CW vs. LMT: Curtiss-Wright vs. Lockheed Martin Stock Comparison
How do Curtiss-Wright (CW) and Lockheed Martin (LMT) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Curtiss-Wright (CW) and Lockheed Martin (LMT) are both classified in the Aerospace & Defense sub-industry within the broader Aerospace & Defense industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.
| Profile Item | CW | LMT |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Curtiss-Wright Corporation | Lockheed Martin Corporation |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| GICS Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Aerospace & Defense |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Capitalization | 16.81 billion USD | 131.00 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | March 17, 1980 | January 2, 1962 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | CW | LMT |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | -15.83% | 31.17% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 33.49% | 12.79% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 29.54% | 14.65% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | CW | LMT |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 38.26% | 31.09% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.93 | 0.10 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -45.25% | -31.79% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 427.49K | 1.29M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | CW | LMT |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.53 | 0.86 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.71 | 1.38 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both companies show strong equity returns, but Lockheed Martin (LMT) at 80.19% is the standout with ROE above its industry range; Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 21.82% also sits in the top quartile.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
21.82%
- Max
- 40.55%
- CW
- 21.82%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
LMT
Capital Goods industry group
80.19%
- LMT
- 80.19%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
Net Margin (TTM)
Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 14.86% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Lockheed Martin (LMT) at 8.23%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
14.86%
- Max
- 27.47%
- CW
- 14.86%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
LMT
Capital Goods industry group
8.23%
- Max
- 27.47%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- LMT
- 8.23%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 19.87% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Lockheed Martin (LMT) at 11.41%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
19.87%
- Max
- 36.60%
- CW
- 19.87%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
LMT
Capital Goods industry group
11.41%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- LMT
- 11.41%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | CW | LMT |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 21.82% | 80.19% |
| ROA (TTM) | 8.90% | 8.58% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 14.86% | 8.23% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 19.87% | 11.41% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 38.07% | 11.73% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 12.08% and Lockheed Martin (LMT) at 5.64% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Both Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 21.99% and Lockheed Martin (LMT) at -3.68% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | CW | LMT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 12.08% | 5.64% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 11.01% | 4.38% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 21.99% | -3.68% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 19.09% | -0.26% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 1.42 and Lockheed Martin (LMT) at 1.26 run current ratio in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
1.42
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- CW
- 1.42
- Min
- 0.36
LMT
Capital Goods industry group
1.26
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- LMT
- 1.26
- Min
- 0.36
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 0.45 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while Lockheed Martin (LMT) at 2.04 uses more debt funding than most peers.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
0.45
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- CW
- 0.45
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
LMT
Capital Goods industry group
2.04
- Max
- 2.33
- LMT
- 2.04
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | CW | LMT |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.42 | 1.26 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.45 | 2.04 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.00 | 1.47 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Lockheed Martin (LMT) at 2.40% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 0.23% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, LMT the richer one.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
0.23%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- CW
- 0.23%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
LMT
Capital Goods industry group
2.40%
- Max
- 2.66%
- LMT
- 2.40%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 6.67% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Lockheed Martin (LMT) at 49.01% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
6.67%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- CW
- 6.67%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
LMT
Capital Goods industry group
49.01%
- Max
- 67.39%
- LMT
- 49.01%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | CW | LMT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.23% | 2.40% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 6.67% | 49.01% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 30.92 and Lockheed Martin (LMT) at 20.14 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
30.92
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- CW
- 30.92
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
LMT
Capital Goods industry group
20.14
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- LMT
- 20.14
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Lockheed Martin (LMT) at 1.66 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 4.50 sits in the pricier quartile — CW costs more per dollar of sales.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
4.50
- Max
- 7.54
- CW
- 4.50
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
LMT
Capital Goods industry group
1.66
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- LMT
- 1.66
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Both look rich against book: Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 6.64 sits in the upper P/B ratio quartile, and Lockheed Martin (LMT) at 12.96 prices even higher, above its industry range.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
6.64
- Max
- 9.66
- CW
- 6.64
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
LMT
Capital Goods industry group
12.96
- LMT
- 12.96
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CW | LMT |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 30.92 | 20.14 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 4.50 | 1.66 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 6.64 | 12.96 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 2.86% | 4.31% |