CW vs. ETN: Curtiss-Wright vs. Eaton Stock Comparison
How do Curtiss-Wright (CW) and Eaton (ETN) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Curtiss-Wright (CW) and Eaton (ETN) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but CW is classified in Aerospace & Defense while ETN is classified in Electrical Equipment.
| Profile Item | CW | ETN |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Curtiss-Wright Corporation | Eaton Corporation plc |
| Country/Region | United States | Ireland |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| GICS Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Electrical Equipment |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Electrical Components & Equipment |
| Market Capitalization | 16.81 billion USD | 132.76 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | March 17, 1980 | June 1, 1972 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | CW | ETN |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | -15.83% | -2.33% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 33.49% | 19.68% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 29.54% | 17.50% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | CW | ETN |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 38.26% | 43.57% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.93 | 1.14 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -45.25% | -34.46% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 427.49K | 2.32M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | CW | ETN |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.53 | -0.15 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.71 | -0.21 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 21.82% and Eaton (ETN) at 19.55% sit in the top peer quartile for ROE, suggesting each generates more profit from shareholders’ equity than typical industry peers.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
21.82%
- Max
- 40.55%
- CW
- 21.82%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
ETN
Capital Goods industry group
19.55%
- Max
- 40.55%
- ETN
- 19.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
Net Margin (TTM)
For every dollar of sales, both Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 14.86% and Eaton (ETN) at 12.18% retain more as net profit than most peers, landing in the top net margin quartile of their industries.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
14.86%
- Max
- 27.47%
- CW
- 14.86%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
ETN
Capital Goods industry group
12.18%
- Max
- 27.47%
- ETN
- 12.18%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 19.87% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Eaton (ETN) at 17.85%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
19.87%
- Max
- 36.60%
- CW
- 19.87%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
ETN
Capital Goods industry group
17.85%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- ETN
- 17.85%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | CW | ETN |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 21.82% | 19.55% |
| ROA (TTM) | 8.90% | 7.22% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 14.86% | 12.18% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 19.87% | 17.85% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 38.07% | 35.16% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 12.08% and Eaton (ETN) at 10.33% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Both Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 21.99% and Eaton (ETN) at 10.00% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | CW | ETN |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 12.08% | 10.33% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 11.01% | 9.77% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 21.99% | 10.00% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 19.09% | 19.39% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 1.42 and Eaton (ETN) at 1.23 run current ratio in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
1.42
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- CW
- 1.42
- Min
- 0.36
ETN
Capital Goods industry group
1.23
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- ETN
- 1.23
- Min
- 0.36
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 0.45 and Eaton (ETN) at 1.00 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
0.45
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- CW
- 0.45
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
ETN
Capital Goods industry group
1.00
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- ETN
- 1.00
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | CW | ETN |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.42 | 1.23 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.45 | 1.00 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.00 | 2.85 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Eaton (ETN) at 1.33% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 0.23% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, ETN the richer one.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
0.23%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- CW
- 0.23%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
ETN
Capital Goods industry group
1.33%
- Max
- 2.66%
- ETN
- 1.33%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 6.67% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Eaton (ETN) at 43.36% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
6.67%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- CW
- 6.67%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
ETN
Capital Goods industry group
43.36%
- Max
- 67.39%
- ETN
- 43.36%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | CW | ETN |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.23% | 1.33% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 6.67% | 43.36% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 30.92 and Eaton (ETN) at 34.14 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
30.92
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- CW
- 30.92
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
ETN
Capital Goods industry group
34.14
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- ETN
- 34.14
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Both Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 4.50 and Eaton (ETN) at 4.15 command a richer price per dollar of sales than most peers, sitting in the upper P/S ratio quartile of their industries.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
4.50
- Max
- 7.54
- CW
- 4.50
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
ETN
Capital Goods industry group
4.15
- Max
- 7.54
- ETN
- 4.15
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Both Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 6.64 and Eaton (ETN) at 6.33 carry a premium to book value versus peers, sitting in the upper P/B ratio quartile of their industries.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
6.64
- Max
- 9.66
- CW
- 6.64
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
ETN
Capital Goods industry group
6.33
- Max
- 9.66
- ETN
- 6.33
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CW | ETN |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 30.92 | 34.14 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 4.50 | 4.15 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 6.64 | 6.33 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 2.86% | 2.29% |