Seek Returns logo

CUBE vs. PLD: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CUBE and PLD, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Both CUBE and PLD are Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs). These entities are required to distribute the majority of their taxable income to shareholders, often resulting in higher dividend yields.

SymbolCUBEPLD
Company NameCubeSmartPrologis, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorReal EstateReal Estate
GICS IndustrySpecialized REITsIndustrial REITs
Market Capitalization9.06 billion USD98.55 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateOctober 22, 2004November 21, 1997
Security TypeREITREIT

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CUBE and PLD by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CUBE vs. PLD: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCUBEPLD
5-Day Price Return0.10%-0.09%
13-Week Price Return-7.90%-3.75%
26-Week Price Return-6.72%-10.42%
52-Week Price Return-16.88%-11.50%
Month-to-Date Return1.62%-0.55%
Year-to-Date Return-7.72%0.46%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.04M3.49M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.86M4.93M
3-Month Volatility20.80%22.31%
Beta0.991.31

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CUBE

13.25%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
37.66%
Q3
20.19%
Median
8.96%
Q1
6.32%
Min
-1.71%

CUBE’s Return on Equity of 13.25% is on par with the norm for the Specialized REITs industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

PLD

6.47%

Industrial REITs Industry

Max
10.99%
Q3
7.31%
Median
5.46%
Q1
3.99%
Min
2.83%

PLD’s Return on Equity of 6.47% is on par with the norm for the Industrial REITs industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CUBE vs. PLD: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Specialized REITs and Industrial REITs industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CUBE

34.27%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
67.81%
Q3
40.70%
Median
25.91%
Q1
11.01%
Min
1.95%

In the Specialized REITs industry, Net Profit Margin is often not the primary profitability metric.

PLD

40.29%

Industrial REITs Industry

Max
56.01%
Q3
49.92%
Median
41.77%
Q1
31.35%
Min
17.66%

In the Industrial REITs industry, Net Profit Margin is often not the primary profitability metric.

CUBE vs. PLD: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Specialized REITs and Industrial REITs industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CUBE

43.37%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
107.13%
Q3
55.10%
Median
41.03%
Q1
17.97%
Min
5.94%

In the Specialized REITs industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

PLD

39.34%

Industrial REITs Industry

Max
103.85%
Q3
66.52%
Median
48.61%
Q1
38.81%
Min
-0.23%

In the Industrial REITs industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

CUBE vs. PLD: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Specialized REITs and Industrial REITs industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCUBEPLD
Return on Equity (TTM)13.25%6.47%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.76%3.58%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)34.27%40.29%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)43.37%39.34%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)69.87%75.35%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CUBE

0.10

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
1.74
Q3
1.13
Median
0.59
Q1
0.35
Min
0.09

CUBE’s Current Ratio of 0.10 falls into the lower quartile for the Specialized REITs industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

PLD

0.19

Industrial REITs Industry

Max
1.34
Q3
0.98
Median
0.61
Q1
0.24
Min
0.12

PLD’s Current Ratio of 0.19 falls into the lower quartile for the Industrial REITs industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

CUBE vs. PLD: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Specialized REITs and Industrial REITs industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CUBE

1.22

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
4.54
Q3
3.26
Median
1.09
Q1
0.58
Min
0.16

CUBE’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.22 is typical for the Specialized REITs industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

PLD

0.66

Industrial REITs Industry

Max
1.18
Q3
0.78
Median
0.68
Q1
0.45
Min
0.19

PLD’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.66 is typical for the Industrial REITs industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CUBE vs. PLD: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Specialized REITs and Industrial REITs industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CUBE

5.24

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
5.24
Q3
4.05
Median
2.99
Q1
2.10
Min
1.28

CUBE’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.24 is in the upper quartile for the Specialized REITs industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

PLD

14.64

Industrial REITs Industry

Max
14.64
Q3
8.83
Median
2.42
Q1
0.90
Min
-0.86

PLD’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 14.64 is in the upper quartile for the Industrial REITs industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

CUBE vs. PLD: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialized REITs and Industrial REITs industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCUBEPLD
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.100.19
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.050.19
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.220.66
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)5.2414.64

Growth

Revenue Growth

CUBE vs. PLD: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CUBE vs. PLD: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CUBE

5.30%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
7.06%
Q3
5.09%
Median
4.51%
Q1
3.18%
Min
1.78%

With a Dividend Yield of 5.30%, CUBE offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Specialized REITs industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

PLD

3.68%

Industrial REITs Industry

Max
6.69%
Q3
4.95%
Median
4.07%
Q1
3.14%
Min
0.80%

PLD’s Dividend Yield of 3.68% is consistent with its peers in the Industrial REITs industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CUBE vs. PLD: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Specialized REITs and Industrial REITs industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CUBE

125.21%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
295.93%
Q3
182.11%
Median
119.31%
Q1
65.42%
Min
43.86%

CUBE’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 125.21% is within the typical range for the Specialized REITs industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

PLD

106.34%

Industrial REITs Industry

Max
190.40%
Q3
117.33%
Median
98.28%
Q1
61.28%
Min
0.00%

PLD’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 106.34% is within the typical range for the Industrial REITs industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CUBE vs. PLD: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialized REITs and Industrial REITs industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCUBEPLD
Dividend Yield (TTM)5.30%3.68%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)125.21%106.34%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CUBE

23.64

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
85.59
Q3
64.69
Median
29.09
Q1
18.22
Min
8.79

The P/E Ratio is often not the primary metric for valuation in the Specialized REITs industry.

PLD

28.89

Industrial REITs Industry

Max
37.42
Q3
29.45
Median
24.42
Q1
16.43
Min
5.63

The P/E Ratio is often not the primary metric for valuation in the Industrial REITs industry.

CUBE vs. PLD: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialized REITs and Industrial REITs industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CUBE

8.10

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
14.35
Q3
9.60
Median
8.74
Q1
5.61
Min
1.63

CUBE’s P/S Ratio of 8.10 aligns with the market consensus for the Specialized REITs industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

PLD

11.64

Industrial REITs Industry

Max
14.39
Q3
11.20
Median
8.86
Q1
7.44
Min
1.80

PLD’s P/S Ratio of 11.64 is in the upper echelon for the Industrial REITs industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

CUBE vs. PLD: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialized REITs and Industrial REITs industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CUBE

3.44

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
11.33
Q3
5.68
Median
2.69
Q1
1.81
Min
0.71

CUBE’s P/B Ratio of 3.44 is within the conventional range for the Specialized REITs industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

PLD

1.85

Industrial REITs Industry

Max
2.58
Q3
1.81
Median
1.19
Q1
0.92
Min
0.66

PLD’s P/B Ratio of 1.85 is in the upper tier for the Industrial REITs industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

CUBE vs. PLD: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Specialized REITs and Industrial REITs industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCUBEPLD
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)23.6428.89
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)8.1011.64
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.441.85
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)16.26408.53