Seek Returns logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

AMT vs. PLD: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Here's a clear look at AMT and PLD, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolAMTPLD
Company NameAmerican Tower CorporationPrologis, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorReal EstateReal Estate
GICS Industry GroupEquity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs)Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs)
GICS IndustrySpecialized REITsIndustrial REITs
GICS Sub-IndustryTelecom Tower REITsIndustrial REITs
Market Capitalization79.36 billion USD120.16 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateFebruary 27, 1998November 21, 1997
Security TypeREITREIT

Both AMT and PLD are Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs). These entities are required to distribute the majority of their taxable income to shareholders, often resulting in higher dividend yields.

PLD's market capitalization (120.16 billion USD) is significantly greater than AMT's (79.36 billion USD), highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AMT and PLD by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AMT vs. PLD: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAMTPLD
5-Day Price Return-3.95%-1.08%
13-Week Price Return-2.86%0.88%
26-Week Price Return-12.26%13.14%
52-Week Price Return-20.80%16.39%
Month-to-Date Return-11.64%-9.59%
Year-to-Date Return-3.45%0.97%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.70M3.32M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.24M3.52M
3-Month Volatility28.71%20.73%
Beta0.931.40

PLD carries a higher beta at 1.40, indicating it's more sensitive to market moves, while AMT (beta: 0.93) exhibits greater stability.

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AMT

68.12%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
21.80%
Q3
20.52%
Median
10.16%
Q1
7.19%
Min
-1.71%

AMT's Return on Equity of 68.12% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Specialized REITs industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

PLD

6.28%

Industrial REITs Industry

Max
10.42%
Q3
7.67%
Median
6.28%
Q1
4.75%
Min
2.44%

PLD's Return on Equity of 6.28% is on par with the norm for the Industrial REITs industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

AMT vs. PLD: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Specialized REITs and Industrial REITs industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AMT

23.76%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
69.28%
Q3
45.13%
Median
29.28%
Q1
11.47%
Min
2.09%

In the Specialized REITs industry, Net Profit Margin is often not the primary profitability metric.

PLD

37.86%

Industrial REITs Industry

Max
89.23%
Q3
61.01%
Median
43.50%
Q1
32.34%
Min
-4.40%

In the Industrial REITs industry, Net Profit Margin is often not the primary profitability metric.

AMT vs. PLD: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Specialized REITs and Industrial REITs industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AMT

45.52%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
107.10%
Q3
62.52%
Median
45.94%
Q1
23.56%
Min
10.59%

In the Specialized REITs industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

PLD

38.80%

Industrial REITs Industry

Max
93.65%
Q3
61.16%
Median
48.54%
Q1
35.45%
Min
0.28%

In the Industrial REITs industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

AMT vs. PLD: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Specialized REITs and Industrial REITs industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAMTPLD
Return on Equity (TTM)68.12%6.28%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.00%3.41%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)23.76%37.86%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)45.52%38.80%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)74.18%74.58%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AMT

0.40

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
1.32
Q3
0.88
Median
0.60
Q1
0.27
Min
0.08

AMT's Current Ratio of 0.40 aligns with the median group of the Specialized REITs industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

PLD

0.19

Industrial REITs Industry

Max
1.17
Q3
0.75
Median
0.52
Q1
0.26
Min
0.13

PLD's Current Ratio of 0.19 falls into the lower quartile for the Industrial REITs industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

AMT vs. PLD: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Specialized REITs and Industrial REITs industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AMT

10.19

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
6.71
Q3
3.63
Median
1.27
Q1
0.66
Min
0.18

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 10.19, AMT operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Specialized REITs industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

PLD

0.66

Industrial REITs Industry

Max
0.96
Q3
0.77
Median
0.66
Q1
0.50
Min
0.23

PLD's Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.66 is typical for the Industrial REITs industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AMT vs. PLD: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Specialized REITs and Industrial REITs industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AMT

2.50

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
5.52
Q3
4.41
Median
3.47
Q1
2.17
Min
1.23

AMT's Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.50 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Specialized REITs industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

PLD

7.44

Industrial REITs Industry

Max
15.64
Q3
8.65
Median
3.09
Q1
0.91
Min
0.08

PLD's Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.44 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Industrial REITs industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

AMT vs. PLD: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialized REITs and Industrial REITs industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAMTPLD
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.400.19
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.330.19
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)10.190.66
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)2.507.44

Growth

Revenue Growth

AMT vs. PLD: A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

Revenue Growth at a Glance

SymbolAMTPLD
Revenue Growth (MRQ vs Prior YoY)7.45%2.37%
Revenue Growth (TTM vs Prior YoY)5.11%7.18%
3-Year Revenue CAGR3.34%13.74%
5-Year Revenue CAGR5.77%14.64%

EPS Growth

AMT vs. PLD: A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth at a Glance

SymbolAMTPLD
EPS Growth (MRQ vs Prior YoY)-33.25%8.97%
EPS Growth (TTM vs Prior YoY)12.08%-11.12%
3-Year EPS CAGR12.24%-5.68%
5-Year EPS CAGR7.32%12.11%

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AMT

4.01%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
7.66%
Q3
5.45%
Median
4.74%
Q1
3.49%
Min
1.96%

AMT's Dividend Yield of 4.01% is consistent with its peers in the Specialized REITs industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

PLD

3.14%

Industrial REITs Industry

Max
8.21%
Q3
5.87%
Median
4.34%
Q1
3.15%
Min
1.14%

PLD's Dividend Yield of 3.14% is in the lower quartile for the Industrial REITs industry. This suggests the company's strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

AMT vs. PLD: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Specialized REITs and Industrial REITs industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AMT

124.82%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
187.04%
Q3
142.30%
Median
126.48%
Q1
75.60%
Min
38.01%

AMT's Dividend Payout Ratio of 124.82% is above 100%. This means the company is paying out more in dividends than it earned, a practice that is often unsustainable and could indicate a risk to future dividend stability.

PLD

116.32%

Industrial REITs Industry

Max
145.17%
Q3
116.18%
Median
93.44%
Q1
55.70%
Min
0.00%

PLD's Dividend Payout Ratio of 116.32% is above 100%. This means the company is paying out more in dividends than it earned, a practice that is often unsustainable and could indicate a risk to future dividend stability.

AMT vs. PLD: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialized REITs and Industrial REITs industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAMTPLD
Dividend Yield (TTM)4.01%3.14%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)124.82%116.32%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AMT

31.13

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
110.80
Q3
52.93
Median
25.51
Q1
14.21
Min
10.77

The P/E Ratio is often not the primary metric for valuation in the Specialized REITs industry.

PLD

37.08

Industrial REITs Industry

Max
38.14
Q3
30.72
Median
20.68
Q1
14.79
Min
6.15

The P/E Ratio is often not the primary metric for valuation in the Industrial REITs industry.

AMT vs. PLD: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialized REITs and Industrial REITs industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AMT

7.40

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
12.64
Q3
9.29
Median
7.72
Q1
6.08
Min
2.57

AMT's P/S Ratio of 7.40 aligns with the market consensus for the Specialized REITs industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

PLD

14.04

Industrial REITs Industry

Max
14.58
Q3
10.88
Median
8.21
Q1
7.35
Min
5.44

PLD's P/S Ratio of 14.04 is in the upper echelon for the Industrial REITs industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

AMT vs. PLD: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialized REITs and Industrial REITs industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AMT

22.65

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
12.70
Q3
8.73
Median
2.90
Q1
1.60
Min
0.68

At 22.65, AMT's P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Specialized REITs industry. This signifies that the market's valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

PLD

2.31

Industrial REITs Industry

Max
2.31
Q3
1.52
Median
1.19
Q1
0.91
Min
0.70

PLD's P/B Ratio of 2.31 is in the upper tier for the Industrial REITs industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company's net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

AMT vs. PLD: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Specialized REITs and Industrial REITs industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAMTPLD
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)31.1337.08
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)7.4014.04
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)22.652.31
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)20.81143.18