CRH vs. SHW: CRH vs. Sherwin-Williams Stock Comparison
How do CRH (CRH) and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
CRH (CRH) and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) both fall under the Materials industry group, but CRH is classified in Construction Materials while SHW is classified in Chemicals.
| Profile Item | CRH | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Name | CRH plc Ordinary Shares | The Sherwin-Williams Company |
| Country/Region | Ireland | United States |
| GICS Sector | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry Group | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry | Construction Materials | Chemicals |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Construction Materials | Specialty Chemicals |
| Market Capitalization | 63.07 billion USD | 83.13 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | July 13, 1989 | March 17, 1980 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | CRH | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | -12.62% | 5.74% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 20.74% | 13.18% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 17.05% | 2.84% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | CRH | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 34.06% | 29.59% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.31 | 1.02 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -39.04% | -42.46% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 5.16M | 1.72M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | CRH | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.50 | 0.05 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.73 | 0.08 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 63.70% clears its industry range for ROE, a sharper capital-efficiency signal than CRH (CRH) at 13.92%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.
CRH
Materials industry group
13.92%
- Max
- 52.88%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- CRH
- 13.92%
- Median
- 8.76%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
SHW
Materials industry group
63.70%
- SHW
- 63.70%
- Max
- 52.88%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both CRH (CRH) at 9.19% and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 10.74% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
CRH
Materials industry group
9.19%
- Max
- 38.66%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- CRH
- 9.19%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
SHW
Materials industry group
10.74%
- Max
- 38.66%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- SHW
- 10.74%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both CRH (CRH) at 18.18% and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 17.56% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
CRH
Materials industry group
18.18%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- CRH
- 18.18%
- Median
- 12.56%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
SHW
Materials industry group
17.56%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- SHW
- 17.56%
- Median
- 12.56%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | CRH | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 13.92% | 63.70% |
| ROA (TTM) | 5.73% | 9.48% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 9.19% | 10.74% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 18.18% | 17.56% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 36.23% | 48.60% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both CRH (CRH) at 5.27% and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 2.06% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Both CRH (CRH) at 9.76% and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at -2.75% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | CRH | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 5.27% | 2.06% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 4.60% | 2.10% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 9.76% | -2.75% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 3.08% | 9.95% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
CRH (CRH) at 1.46 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 0.71 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for SHW.
CRH
Materials industry group
1.46
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- Median
- 2.24
- CRH
- 1.46
- Q1
- 1.45
- Min
- 0.16
SHW
Materials industry group
0.71
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- SHW
- 0.71
- Min
- 0.16
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
CRH (CRH) at 0.82 is near its industry mid-range for debt-to-equity ratio, while Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 3.72 sits above its benchmark range, pointing to a heavier debt load relative to equity.
CRH
Materials industry group
0.82
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- CRH
- 0.82
- Median
- 0.47
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
SHW
Materials industry group
3.72
- SHW
- 3.72
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.47
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | CRH | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.46 | 0.71 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.82 | 3.72 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.12 | 3.04 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both CRH (CRH) at 1.61% and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 0.91% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
CRH
Materials industry group
1.61%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- CRH
- 1.61%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
SHW
Materials industry group
0.91%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- SHW
- 0.91%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both CRH (CRH) at 29.00% and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 29.35% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
CRH
Materials industry group
29.00%
- Max
- 83.62%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- CRH
- 29.00%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
SHW
Materials industry group
29.35%
- Max
- 83.62%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- SHW
- 29.35%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | CRH | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.61% | 0.91% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 29.00% | 29.35% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both CRH (CRH) at 17.85 and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 31.66 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
CRH
Materials industry group
17.85
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- Median
- 18.82
- CRH
- 17.85
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
SHW
Materials industry group
31.66
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- SHW
- 31.66
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
P/S Ratio (TTM)
On P/S ratio, both CRH (CRH) at 1.62 and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 3.34 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.
CRH
Materials industry group
1.62
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- Median
- 1.87
- CRH
- 1.62
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
SHW
Materials industry group
3.34
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- SHW
- 3.34
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
CRH (CRH) at 2.52 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 20.78 prices above its benchmark range — SHW looks rich relative to book.
CRH
Materials industry group
2.52
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- CRH
- 2.52
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
SHW
Materials industry group
20.78
- SHW
- 20.78
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CRH | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 17.85 | 31.66 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 1.62 | 3.34 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 2.52 | 20.78 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 3.61% | 2.98% |