CRH vs. RIO: CRH vs. Rio Tinto Stock Comparison
How do CRH (CRH) and Rio Tinto (RIO) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
CRH (CRH) and Rio Tinto (RIO) both fall under the Materials industry group, but CRH is classified in Construction Materials while RIO is classified in Metals & Mining.
CRH (CRH) trades as ordinary local shares, while Rio Tinto (RIO) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.
| Profile Item | CRH | RIO |
|---|---|---|
| Name | CRH plc Ordinary Shares | Rio Tinto plc ADR |
| Country/Region | Ireland | United Kingdom |
| GICS Sector | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry Group | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry | Construction Materials | Metals & Mining |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Construction Materials | Diversified Metals & Mining |
| Market Capitalization | 63.07 billion USD | 136.19 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | July 13, 1989 | June 28, 1990 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | ADR |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | CRH | RIO |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | -12.62% | 30.54% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 20.74% | 16.90% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 17.05% | 14.68% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
CRH (CRH) has an aggressive beta of 1.31, indicating higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, while Rio Tinto (RIO) is defensive at 0.63 and tends to be less market-sensitive — they sit on opposite ends of the beta spectrum.
| Metric | CRH | RIO |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 34.06% | 30.72% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.31 | 0.63 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -39.04% | -35.25% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 5.16M | 2.35M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | CRH | RIO |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.50 | 0.85 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.73 | 1.26 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both CRH (CRH) at 13.92% and Rio Tinto (RIO) at 19.31% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
CRH
Materials industry group
13.92%
- Max
- 52.88%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- CRH
- 13.92%
- Median
- 8.76%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
RIO
Materials industry group
19.31%
- Max
- 52.88%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- RIO
- 19.31%
- Median
- 8.76%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
Net Margin (TTM)
Rio Tinto (RIO) at 19.59% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of CRH (CRH) at 9.19%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
CRH
Materials industry group
9.19%
- Max
- 38.66%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- CRH
- 9.19%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
RIO
Materials industry group
19.59%
- Max
- 38.66%
- RIO
- 19.59%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both CRH (CRH) at 18.18% and Rio Tinto (RIO) at 28.05% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
CRH
Materials industry group
18.18%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- CRH
- 18.18%
- Median
- 12.56%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
RIO
Materials industry group
28.05%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- RIO
- 28.05%
- Median
- 12.56%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | CRH | RIO |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 13.92% | 19.31% |
| ROA (TTM) | 5.73% | 8.11% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 9.19% | 19.59% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 18.18% | 28.05% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 36.23% | 29.75% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both CRH (CRH) at 5.27% and Rio Tinto (RIO) at 7.42% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Both CRH (CRH) at 9.76% and Rio Tinto (RIO) at -13.97% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | CRH | RIO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 5.27% | 7.42% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 4.60% | 1.24% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 9.76% | -13.97% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 3.08% | -7.23% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
CRH (CRH) at 1.46 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Rio Tinto (RIO) at 1.42 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for RIO.
CRH
Materials industry group
1.46
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- Median
- 2.24
- CRH
- 1.46
- Q1
- 1.45
- Min
- 0.16
RIO
Materials industry group
1.42
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- RIO
- 1.42
- Min
- 0.16
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both CRH (CRH) at 0.82 and Rio Tinto (RIO) at 0.32 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
CRH
Materials industry group
0.82
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- CRH
- 0.82
- Median
- 0.47
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
RIO
Materials industry group
0.32
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.47
- RIO
- 0.32
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | CRH | RIO |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.46 | 1.42 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.82 | 0.32 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.12 | 0.58 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
CRH (CRH) at 1.61% pays an industry-typical yield; Rio Tinto (RIO) at 5.59% is above its entire peer range — the higher number, but one that calls for a look at payout sustainability before treating it as an advantage.
CRH
Materials industry group
1.61%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- CRH
- 1.61%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
RIO
Materials industry group
5.59%
- RIO
- 5.59%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
CRH (CRH) at 29.00% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Rio Tinto (RIO) at 54.46% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
CRH
Materials industry group
29.00%
- Max
- 83.62%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- CRH
- 29.00%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
RIO
Materials industry group
54.46%
- Max
- 83.62%
- RIO
- 54.46%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | CRH | RIO |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.61% | 5.59% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 29.00% | 54.46% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Rio Tinto (RIO) at 11.35 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while CRH (CRH) at 17.85 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for RIO, though growth and earnings durability still matter.
CRH
Materials industry group
17.85
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- Median
- 18.82
- CRH
- 17.85
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
RIO
Materials industry group
11.35
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- RIO
- 11.35
- Min
- 3.93
P/S Ratio (TTM)
On P/S ratio, both CRH (CRH) at 1.62 and Rio Tinto (RIO) at 2.20 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.
CRH
Materials industry group
1.62
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- Median
- 1.87
- CRH
- 1.62
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
RIO
Materials industry group
2.20
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- RIO
- 2.20
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
On P/B ratio, both CRH (CRH) at 2.52 and Rio Tinto (RIO) at 2.08 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.
CRH
Materials industry group
2.52
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- CRH
- 2.52
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
RIO
Materials industry group
2.08
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- RIO
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CRH | RIO |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 17.85 | 11.35 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 1.62 | 2.20 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 2.52 | 2.08 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 3.61% | 2.64% |