Seek Returns

CR vs. PH: Crane vs. Parker-Hannifin Stock Comparison

How do Crane (CR) and Parker-Hannifin (PH) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Crane (CR) and Parker-Hannifin (PH) are both classified in the Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components sub-industry within the broader Machinery industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

Parker-Hannifin (PH) has more than two decades of public-market history since March 17, 1980, whereas Crane (CR) listed on March 29, 2023 and has a much shorter record to draw on.

Company profile comparison for Crane (CR) and Parker-Hannifin (PH)
Profile ItemCRPH
NameCrane CompanyParker-Hannifin Corporation
Country/RegionUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS Industry GroupCapital GoodsCapital Goods
GICS IndustryMachineryMachinery
GICS Sub-IndustryIndustrial Machinery & Supplies & ComponentsIndustrial Machinery & Supplies & Components
Market Capitalization11.63 billion USD115.73 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 29, 2023March 17, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

CR
PH
GSPC
Loading price history…
Crane (CR) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for Crane (CR) and Parker-Hannifin (PH). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for Crane (CR) and Parker-Hannifin (PH). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Crane (CR) and Parker-Hannifin (PH)
MetricCRPH
Total Return (1Y)11.24%14.13%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)28.26%33.71%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)--25.35%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

CR
PH
GSPC
Loading price history…
Crane (CR) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for Crane (CR) and Parker-Hannifin (PH). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Crane (CR) and Parker-Hannifin (PH)
MetricCRPH
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)34.10%27.33%
Beta (5Y)0.981.12
Max Drawdown (5Y)-28.02%-28.64%
Avg. Volume (3M)401.91K627.57K

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
CR and PH are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Crane (CR) and Parker-Hannifin (PH)
MetricCRPH
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)0.200.36
Sortino Ratio (1Y)0.280.53

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 24.95% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Crane (CR) at 16.14% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for PH.

CR

Capital Goods industry group

16.14%

Max
40.55%
Q3
19.29%
CR
16.14%
Median
12.12%
Q1
4.08%
Min
-17.12%

PH

Capital Goods industry group

24.95%

Max
40.55%
PH
24.95%
Q3
19.29%
Median
12.12%
Q1
4.08%
Min
-17.12%
Loading chart…
Crane (CR) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their ROE against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

For every dollar of sales, both Crane (CR) at 12.41% and Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 16.62% retain more as net profit than most peers, landing in the top net margin quartile of their industries.

CR

Capital Goods industry group

12.41%

Max
27.47%
CR
12.41%
Q3
12.10%
Median
6.30%
Q1
1.40%
Min
-12.89%

PH

Capital Goods industry group

16.62%

Max
27.47%
PH
16.62%
Q3
12.10%
Median
6.30%
Q1
1.40%
Min
-12.89%
Loading chart…
Crane (CR) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their net margin against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both Crane (CR) at 18.77% and Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 21.90% convert sales into operating profit at a top-quartile rate, pointing to tighter cost discipline before financing and tax.

CR

Capital Goods industry group

18.77%

Max
36.60%
CR
18.77%
Q3
18.33%
Median
11.12%
Q1
5.14%
Min
-12.63%

PH

Capital Goods industry group

21.90%

Max
36.60%
PH
21.90%
Q3
18.33%
Median
11.12%
Q1
5.14%
Min
-12.63%
Loading chart…
Crane (CR) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their operating margin against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Crane (CR) and Parker-Hannifin (PH)
MetricCRPH
ROE (TTM)16.14%24.95%
ROA (TTM)9.33%8.56%
Net Margin (TTM)12.41%16.62%
Operating Margin (TTM)18.77%21.90%
Gross Margin (TTM)42.27%37.70%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Both Crane (CR) at 8.16% and Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 8.31% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Loading chart…
Crane (CR) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Both Crane (CR) at 23.96% and Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 5.01% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Loading chart…
Crane (CR) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Crane (CR) and Parker-Hannifin (PH)
MetricCRPH
Revenue Growth (YoY)8.16%8.31%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)9.07%4.09%
EPS Growth (YoY)23.96%5.01%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)-4.47%21.09%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Crane (CR) at 2.61 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 0.94 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for PH.

CR

Capital Goods industry group

2.61

Max
5.22
Q3
2.95
CR
2.61
Median
2.08
Q1
1.43
Min
0.36

PH

Capital Goods industry group

0.94

Max
5.22
Q3
2.95
Median
2.08
Q1
1.43
PH
0.94
Min
0.36
Loading chart…
Crane (CR) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their current ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Both Crane (CR) at 0.42 and Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 1.09 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.

CR

Capital Goods industry group

0.42

Max
2.33
Q3
1.12
Median
0.60
CR
0.42
Q1
0.29
Min
0.00

PH

Capital Goods industry group

1.09

Max
2.33
Q3
1.12
PH
1.09
Median
0.60
Q1
0.29
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Crane (CR) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Crane (CR) and Parker-Hannifin (PH)
MetricCRPH
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.610.94
Debt / Equity (MRQ)0.421.09
Net Debt / EBITDA1.082.81

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both Crane (CR) at 0.50% and Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 0.85% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

CR

Capital Goods industry group

0.50%

Max
2.66%
Q3
1.14%
CR
0.50%
Median
0.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PH

Capital Goods industry group

0.85%

Max
2.66%
Q3
1.14%
PH
0.85%
Median
0.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Crane (CR) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Both Crane (CR) at 17.10% and Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 26.11% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

CR

Capital Goods industry group

17.10%

Max
67.39%
Q3
28.02%
CR
17.10%
Median
6.86%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PH

Capital Goods industry group

26.11%

Max
67.39%
Q3
28.02%
PH
26.11%
Median
6.86%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Crane (CR) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Crane (CR) and Parker-Hannifin (PH)
MetricCRPH
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.50%0.85%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)17.10%26.11%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Both Crane (CR) at 34.55 and Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 31.53 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.

CR

Capital Goods industry group

34.55

Max
59.38
Q3
35.92
CR
34.55
Median
25.41
Q1
19.47
Min
3.03

PH

Capital Goods industry group

31.53

Max
59.38
Q3
35.92
PH
31.53
Median
25.41
Q1
19.47
Min
3.03
Loading chart…
Crane (CR) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Both Crane (CR) at 4.22 and Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 5.16 command a richer price per dollar of sales than most peers, sitting in the upper P/S ratio quartile of their industries.

CR

Capital Goods industry group

4.22

Max
7.54
CR
4.22
Q3
3.76
Median
2.15
Q1
1.03
Min
0.03

PH

Capital Goods industry group

5.16

Max
7.54
PH
5.16
Q3
3.76
Median
2.15
Q1
1.03
Min
0.03
Loading chart…
Crane (CR) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Both Crane (CR) at 5.13 and Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 7.25 carry a premium to book value versus peers, sitting in the upper P/B ratio quartile of their industries.

CR

Capital Goods industry group

5.13

Max
9.66
CR
5.13
Q3
5.00
Median
3.12
Q1
1.81
Min
-1.08

PH

Capital Goods industry group

7.25

Max
9.66
PH
7.25
Q3
5.00
Median
3.12
Q1
1.81
Min
-1.08
Loading chart…
Crane (CR) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Crane (CR) and Parker-Hannifin (PH)
MetricCRPH
P/E Ratio (TTM)34.5531.53
P/S Ratio (TTM)4.225.16
P/B Ratio (MRQ)5.137.25
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)1.88%2.45%