COP vs. VLO: ConocoPhillips vs. Valero Energy Stock Comparison
How do ConocoPhillips (COP) and Valero Energy (VLO) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
ConocoPhillips (COP) and Valero Energy (VLO) both belong to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, though COP is classified under Oil & Gas Exploration & Production while VLO falls under Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing.
| Profile Item | COP | VLO |
|---|---|---|
| Name | ConocoPhillips | Valero Energy Corporation |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry Group | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing |
| Market Capitalization | 161.12 billion USD | 96.62 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | December 31, 1981 | January 4, 1982 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | COP | VLO |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 62.02% | 107.71% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 9.29% | 47.89% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 16.40% | 39.74% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | COP | VLO |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 31.63% | 39.31% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.19 | 0.60 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -36.30% | -41.22% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 6.60M | 3.05M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | COP | VLO |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 1.83 | 2.63 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 2.70 | 4.08 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Valero Energy (VLO) at 46.87% sits in the top ROE quartile, while ConocoPhillips (COP) at 17.66% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for VLO.
COP
Energy industry group
17.66%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- COP
- 17.66%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
VLO
Energy industry group
46.87%
- Max
- 53.85%
- VLO
- 46.87%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 16.76% and Valero Energy (VLO) at 8.83% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
COP
Energy industry group
16.76%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- COP
- 16.76%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
VLO
Energy industry group
8.83%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- Median
- 10.10%
- VLO
- 8.83%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 30.05% and Valero Energy (VLO) at 20.47% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
COP
Energy industry group
30.05%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- COP
- 30.05%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
VLO
Energy industry group
20.47%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- VLO
- 20.47%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | COP | VLO |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 17.66% | 46.87% |
| ROA (TTM) | 8.98% | 17.68% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 16.76% | 8.83% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 30.05% | 20.47% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 49.01% | 19.52% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 7.67% and Valero Energy (VLO) at -5.54% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at -18.69% and Valero Energy (VLO) at -11.77% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | COP | VLO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 7.67% | -5.54% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -9.11% | -11.40% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -18.69% | -11.77% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -24.18% | -36.12% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 1.52 and Valero Energy (VLO) at 1.72 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.
COP
Energy industry group
1.52
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- COP
- 1.52
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
VLO
Energy industry group
1.72
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- VLO
- 1.72
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 0.35 and Valero Energy (VLO) at 0.35 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
COP
Energy industry group
0.35
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- COP
- 0.35
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
VLO
Energy industry group
0.35
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- VLO
- 0.35
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | COP | VLO |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.52 | 1.72 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.35 | 0.35 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.45 | 0.06 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 2.48% and Valero Energy (VLO) at 1.35% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
COP
Energy industry group
2.48%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- COP
- 2.48%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
VLO
Energy industry group
1.35%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- Median
- 1.71%
- VLO
- 1.35%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 35.41% and Valero Energy (VLO) at 10.76% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
COP
Energy industry group
35.41%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- COP
- 35.41%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
VLO
Energy industry group
10.76%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- VLO
- 10.76%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | COP | VLO |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 2.48% | 1.35% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 35.41% | 10.76% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 14.36 and Valero Energy (VLO) at 7.88 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
COP
Energy industry group
14.36
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- COP
- 14.36
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
VLO
Energy industry group
7.88
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- VLO
- 7.88
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Valero Energy (VLO) at 0.66 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while ConocoPhillips (COP) at 2.34 prices around its industry’s middle — VLO costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.
COP
Energy industry group
2.34
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- COP
- 2.34
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
VLO
Energy industry group
0.66
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- VLO
- 0.66
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 2.44 and Valero Energy (VLO) at 3.45 carry a premium to book value versus peers, sitting in the upper P/B ratio quartile of their industries.
COP
Energy industry group
2.44
- Max
- 4.21
- COP
- 2.44
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
VLO
Energy industry group
3.45
- Max
- 4.21
- VLO
- 3.45
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | COP | VLO |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 14.36 | 7.88 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 2.34 | 0.66 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 2.44 | 3.45 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 7.12% | 13.02% |