CNQ vs. PSX: Canadian Natural Resources vs. Phillips 66 Stock Comparison
How do Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ) and Phillips 66 (PSX) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ) and Phillips 66 (PSX) both belong to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, though CNQ is classified under Oil & Gas Exploration & Production while PSX falls under Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing.
| Profile Item | CNQ | PSX |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. | Phillips 66 |
| Country/Region | Canada | United States |
| GICS Sector | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry Group | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing |
| Market Capitalization | 98.81 billion USD | 95.85 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | July 31, 2000 | April 12, 2012 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | CNQ | PSX |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 56.47% | 88.91% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 19.27% | 36.18% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 23.01% | 30.83% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | CNQ | PSX |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 32.07% | 33.42% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.48 | 0.72 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -35.85% | -44.37% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 6.32M | 2.92M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | CNQ | PSX |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 1.63 | 2.53 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 2.31 | 3.93 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ) at 32.39% and Phillips 66 (PSX) at 39.84% sit in the top peer quartile for ROE, suggesting each generates more profit from shareholders’ equity than typical industry peers.
CNQ
Energy industry group
32.39%
- Max
- 53.85%
- CNQ
- 32.39%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
PSX
Energy industry group
39.84%
- Max
- 53.85%
- PSX
- 39.84%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
Net Margin (TTM)
Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ) at 29.51% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Phillips 66 (PSX) at 7.48%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
CNQ
Energy industry group
29.51%
- Max
- 56.92%
- CNQ
- 29.51%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
PSX
Energy industry group
7.48%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- Median
- 10.10%
- PSX
- 7.48%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ) at 32.24% and Phillips 66 (PSX) at 13.17% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
CNQ
Energy industry group
32.24%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- CNQ
- 32.24%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
PSX
Energy industry group
13.17%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- Median
- 18.73%
- PSX
- 13.17%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | CNQ | PSX |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 32.39% | 39.84% |
| ROA (TTM) | 9.97% | 10.64% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 29.51% | 7.48% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 32.24% | 13.17% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 52.92% | 15.08% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ) at 6.40% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Phillips 66 (PSX) at -7.53% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.
EPS Growth
Both Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ) at 81.05% and Phillips 66 (PSX) at 116.23% sit in the top peer quartile for EPS growth, so each is compounding per-share earnings faster than typical industry peers.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | CNQ | PSX |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 6.40% | -7.53% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -3.75% | -8.00% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 81.05% | 116.23% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 2.73% | -22.60% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ) at 0.99 and Phillips 66 (PSX) at 1.34 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.
CNQ
Energy industry group
0.99
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- CNQ
- 0.99
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
PSX
Energy industry group
1.34
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- PSX
- 1.34
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ) at 0.42 and Phillips 66 (PSX) at 0.52 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
CNQ
Energy industry group
0.42
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- CNQ
- 0.42
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
PSX
Energy industry group
0.52
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- PSX
- 0.52
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | CNQ | PSX |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 0.99 | 1.34 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.42 | 0.52 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.67 | 0.82 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ) at 5.03% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Phillips 66 (PSX) at 2.03% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, CNQ the richer one.
CNQ
Energy industry group
5.03%
- Max
- 8.57%
- CNQ
- 5.03%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
PSX
Energy industry group
2.03%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- PSX
- 2.03%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ) at 36.37% and Phillips 66 (PSX) at 16.07% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
CNQ
Energy industry group
36.37%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- CNQ
- 36.37%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
PSX
Energy industry group
16.07%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- PSX
- 16.07%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | CNQ | PSX |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 5.03% | 2.03% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 36.37% | 16.07% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ) at 9.95 and Phillips 66 (PSX) at 7.88 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
CNQ
Energy industry group
9.95
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- CNQ
- 9.95
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
PSX
Energy industry group
7.88
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- PSX
- 7.88
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Phillips 66 (PSX) at 0.57 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ) at 2.06 prices around its industry’s middle — PSX costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.
CNQ
Energy industry group
2.06
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- CNQ
- 2.06
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
PSX
Energy industry group
0.57
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- PSX
- 0.57
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Both Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ) at 2.97 and Phillips 66 (PSX) at 2.79 carry a premium to book value versus peers, sitting in the upper P/B ratio quartile of their industries.
CNQ
Energy industry group
2.97
- Max
- 4.21
- CNQ
- 2.97
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
PSX
Energy industry group
2.79
- Max
- 4.21
- PSX
- 2.79
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CNQ | PSX |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 9.95 | 7.88 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 2.06 | 0.57 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 2.97 | 2.79 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 12.33% | 9.93% |