CNH vs. PH: CNH Industrial vs. Parker-Hannifin Stock Comparison
How do CNH Industrial (CNH) and Parker-Hannifin (PH) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
CNH Industrial (CNH) and Parker-Hannifin (PH) both belong to the Machinery industry, though CNH is classified under Agricultural & Farm Machinery while PH falls under Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components.
| Profile Item | CNH | PH |
|---|---|---|
| Name | CNH Industrial N.V. | Parker-Hannifin Corporation |
| Country/Region | United Kingdom | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| GICS Industry | Machinery | Machinery |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Agricultural & Farm Machinery | Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components |
| Market Capitalization | 18.59 billion USD | 115.73 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | September 30, 2013 | March 17, 1980 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | CNH | PH |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 38.02% | 14.13% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 11.70% | 33.71% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | -0.45% | 25.35% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
CNH Industrial (CNH) is heavily traded at around 18.71M shares per day, whereas Parker-Hannifin (PH) sees a more moderate 627.57K — larger orders in the latter may require more patience and tighter control over order sizing.
| Metric | CNH | PH |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 45.52% | 27.33% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.19 | 1.12 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -43.80% | -28.64% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 18.71M | 627.57K |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | CNH | PH |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.74 | 0.36 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 1.25 | 0.53 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 24.95% sits in the top ROE quartile, while CNH Industrial (CNH) at 3.91% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in returns on equity.
CNH
Capital Goods industry group
3.91%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- CNH
- 3.91%
- Min
- -17.12%
PH
Capital Goods industry group
24.95%
- Max
- 40.55%
- PH
- 24.95%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
Net Margin (TTM)
Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 16.62% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of CNH Industrial (CNH) at 1.71%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
CNH
Capital Goods industry group
1.71%
- Max
- 27.47%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- CNH
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
PH
Capital Goods industry group
16.62%
- Max
- 27.47%
- PH
- 16.62%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 21.90% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of CNH Industrial (CNH) at 5.54%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
CNH
Capital Goods industry group
5.54%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- CNH
- 5.54%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
PH
Capital Goods industry group
21.90%
- Max
- 36.60%
- PH
- 21.90%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | CNH | PH |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 3.91% | 24.95% |
| ROA (TTM) | 0.87% | 8.56% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 1.71% | 16.62% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 5.54% | 21.90% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 17.76% | 37.70% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 8.31% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while CNH Industrial (CNH) at -8.78% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.
EPS Growth
Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 5.01% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while CNH Industrial (CNH) at -58.59% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | CNH | PH |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -8.78% | 8.31% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -8.41% | 4.09% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -58.59% | 5.01% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -34.96% | 21.09% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
CNH Industrial (CNH) at 4.88 carries current ratio above its industry’s typical mid-range, while Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 0.94 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — different working-capital profiles, both worth examining.
CNH
Capital Goods industry group
4.88
- Max
- 5.22
- CNH
- 4.88
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- Min
- 0.36
PH
Capital Goods industry group
0.94
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- PH
- 0.94
- Min
- 0.36
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 1.09 is near its industry mid-range for debt-to-equity ratio, while CNH Industrial (CNH) at 3.35 sits above its benchmark range, pointing to a heavier debt load relative to equity.
CNH
Capital Goods industry group
3.35
- CNH
- 3.35
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
PH
Capital Goods industry group
1.09
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- PH
- 1.09
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | CNH | PH |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 4.88 | 0.94 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 3.35 | 1.09 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 23.62 | 2.81 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both CNH Industrial (CNH) at 0.89% and Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 0.85% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
CNH
Capital Goods industry group
0.89%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- CNH
- 0.89%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
PH
Capital Goods industry group
0.85%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- PH
- 0.85%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 26.11% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while CNH Industrial (CNH) at 40.00% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
CNH
Capital Goods industry group
40.00%
- Max
- 67.39%
- CNH
- 40.00%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
PH
Capital Goods industry group
26.11%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- PH
- 26.11%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | CNH | PH |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.89% | 0.85% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 40.00% | 26.11% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 31.53 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while CNH Industrial (CNH) at 46.24 sits in the richer quartile — CNH needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.
CNH
Capital Goods industry group
46.24
- Max
- 59.38
- CNH
- 46.24
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
PH
Capital Goods industry group
31.53
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- PH
- 31.53
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
P/S Ratio (TTM)
CNH Industrial (CNH) at 1.02 looks cheap on sales in the lower P/S ratio quartile, while Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 5.16 looks rich in the upper quartile — a clear gap in price per dollar of revenue.
CNH
Capital Goods industry group
1.02
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- CNH
- 1.02
- Min
- 0.03
PH
Capital Goods industry group
5.16
- Max
- 7.54
- PH
- 5.16
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
CNH Industrial (CNH) at 1.84 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 7.25 carries an above-peer premium to book — PH is pricier on assets.
CNH
Capital Goods industry group
1.84
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- CNH
- 1.84
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
PH
Capital Goods industry group
7.25
- Max
- 9.66
- PH
- 7.25
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CNH | PH |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 46.24 | 31.53 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 1.02 | 5.16 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 1.84 | 7.25 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 3.03% | 2.45% |