CNA vs. L: CNA Financial vs. Loews Stock Comparison

Company Profile

CNA Financial (CNA) and Loews (L) are both classified in the Property & Casualty Insurance sub-industry within the broader Insurance industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

CNA Financial (CNA) at 9.56% is around its peer norm for ROE, while Loews (L) at 8.21% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker returns on shareholders’ equity.

Both CNA Financial (CNA) at 6.80% and Loews (L) at 7.93% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

Neither side reports a meaningful operating margin: for CNA Financial (CNA) in Insurance and Loews (L) in Insurance, funding costs are part of the core business, so net margin and ROE are the cleaner profitability reads.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Both CNA Financial (CNA) at 5.10% and Loews (L) at 5.44% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Both CNA Financial (CNA) at 33.24% and Loews (L) at 24.34% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: CNA Financial (CNA) in Insurance and Loews (L) in Insurance both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: CNA Financial (CNA) in Insurance and Loews (L) in Insurance run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

CNA Financial (CNA) at 3.95% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Loews (L) at 0.23% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, CNA the richer one.

Loews (L) at 3.46% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while CNA Financial (CNA) at 50.26% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Both CNA Financial (CNA) at 12.52 and Loews (L) at 15.17 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.

CNA Financial (CNA) at 0.84 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Loews (L) at 1.18 prices around its industry’s middle — CNA costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.

Loews (L) at 1.22 sits in the lower P/B ratio quartile against book while CNA Financial (CNA) at 1.25 is valued near its industry’s middle — L is cheaper on assets, though weigh it against ROE and asset quality.

Valuation Metrics